Cited by 667Public Health and Social InequalitiesHealth disparities and outcomesHealthcare Systems and Reforms

Equity of access to health care services:

Goddard, Maria, Smith, Peter·2001·Social Science & Medicine

Abstract

The pursuit of equity of access to health care is a central objective of many health care systems. This paper first sets out a general theoretical framework within which equity of access can be examined. It then applies the framework by examining the extent to which research evidence has been able to detect systematic inequities of access in UK, where equity of access has been a central focus in the National Health Service since its inception in 1948. Inequity between socio-economic groups is used as an illustrative example, and the extent of inequity of access experienced is explored in each of five service areas: general practitioner consultations; acute hospital care; mental health services; preventative medicine and health promotion; and long-term health care. The paper concludes that there appear to be important inequities in access to some types of health care in the UK, but that the evidence is often methodologically inadequate, making it difficult to draw firm conclusions. In particular, it is difficult to establish the causes of inequities which in turn limits the scope for recommending appropriate policy to reduce inequities of access. The theoretical framework and the lessons learned from the UK are of direct relevance to researchers from other countries seeking to examine equity of access in a wide variety of institutional settings.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0277-9536(00)00415-9

Cites

76 of 76 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Goddard, M., & Smith, P.
Affiliations
University of York (GB)
Corresponding author
Smith, Peter
Venue
Social Science & Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2001-11
Volume
53
Issue
9
Pages
1149-1162
ISSN
0277-9536 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1548648904
Cited by
667
References
76
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 70 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 33 · 2018: 37 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 41 · 2015: 33 · 2014: 33 · 2013: 25 · 2012: 31
FWCI
11.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Social Science & Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Goddard Space Flight Center
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Public Health and Social Inequalities
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Healthcare Systems and Reforms
Keywords
health disparities, socioeconomic disparities, National Health Service, general practitioner visits, acute hospital care, mental health services, health promotion, long-term care, health policy
MeSH terms
United Kingdom, Health Services Accessibility, Health Services Needs and Demand, Health Services Research, Humans, Social Justice, Socioeconomic Factors, State Medicine, Models, Statistical

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review