The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Depression, anxiety, and social disability show synchrony of change in primary care patients.
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVES. The purposes of this study were to (1) characterize the social disability associated with the common psychiatric illnesses of primary care patients in terms of role dysfunction (self-care, family role, social role, occupational role) and (2) establish whether severity of psychiatric illness and disability level show synchrony of change. METHODS. A two-stage sample design was employed. In the first stage, 1994 consecutive attenders of 25 general practitioners were screened on psychiatric illness by their physicians and with the General Health Questionnaire. A stratified random sample (n = 285) with differing probabilities was selected for a second-stage interview. Patients with psychiatric symptoms were reinterviewed 1 and 3.5 years later (n = 143). RESULTS. (1) Disability level among patients was increased (moderately for depression, mildly for anxiety) and was associated with severity of psychiatric illness. (2) Most disability was found in occupational and social roles. (3) Change in severity of psychiatric illness was concordant with change in level of disability and was largely invariant across diagnosis (depression, anxiety, mixed anxiety/depression). At follow-up, disability among improved patients had returned to normal levels. CONCLUSIONS. Psychiatric illness in primary care patients is associated with mild to moderate disability, and severity of psychiatric illness and disability show synchrony of change.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Health complaints, stress, and distress: Exploring the central role of negative affectivity.
Watson, D., & Pennebaker, J. W. (1989) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.96.2.234 · Cited by 3,030
(1988) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/ajp.145.8.976 · Cited by 641
Disability and Depression Among High Utilizers of Health Care: A Longitudinal Analysis
Von Korff, M. (1992) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1992.01820020011002 · Cited by 523
Cited by
JACOBI, F., WITTCHEN, H.-U., HÖLTING, C., HÖFLER, M., PFISTER, H., MÜLLER, N., & LIEB, R. (2004) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291703001399 · Cited by 1,097
Epidemiology and treatment of depression in patients with chronic medical illness
J. Katon, W. (2011) · Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience · doi:10.31887/dcns.2011.13.1/wkaton · Cited by 820
Lenze, E. J., Rogers, J. C., Martire, L. M., Mulsant, B. H., Rollman, B. L., Dew, M. A., Schulz, R., & Reynolds, C. F. (2001) · The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry · doi:10.1097/00019442-200105000-00004 · Cited by 593
Penninx, B. W., Leveille, S., Ferrucci, L., van Eijk, J. T., & Guralnik, J. M. (1999) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.89.9.1346 · Cited by 570
Andrews, G., Issakidis, C., Sanderson, K., Corry, J., & Lapsley, H. (2004) · British Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1192/bjp.184.6.526 · Cited by 560
Metadata
- Authors
- Ormel, J., Von Korff, M., Van den Brink, W., Katon, W., Brilman, E., & Oldehinkel, T.
- Venue
- American Journal of Public Health
- Publisher
- American Public Health Association
- Published
- 1993-03
- Volume
- 83
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 385-390
- ISSN
- 0090-0036 (ISSN-L)
- 1541-0048
- OpenAlex
- W2051741287
- Cited by
- 255
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 13.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Depression, anxiety, and social disability show synchrony of change in primary care patients. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2105/ajph.83.3.385
- The paper
- Ormel, J., Von Korff, M., Van den Brink, W., Katon, W., Brilman, E., & Oldehinkel, T. (1993). Depression, anxiety, and social disability show synchrony of change in primary care patients. American Journal of Public Health. https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.83.3.385
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.