Cited by 560Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of LifeMental Health Treatment and AccessPsychiatric care and mental health services

Utilising survey data to inform public policy: Comparison of the cost-effectiveness of treatment of ten mental disorders

Open access
Andrews, Gavin, Issakidis, Cathy, Sanderson, Kristy, Corry, Justine, Lapsley, Helen·2004·British Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

Background: Mental health survey data are now being used proactively to decide how the burden of disease might best be reduced. Aims: To study the cost-effectiveness of current and optimal treatments for mental disorders and the proportion of burden avertable by each. Method: Data for three affective, four anxiety and two alcohol use disorders and for schizophrenia were compared in terms of cost, burden averted and efficiency of current and optimal treatment. We then calculated the burden unavertable given current knowledge. The unit of health gain was a reduction in the years lived with disability (YLDs). Results: Summing across all disorders, current treatment averted 13% of the burden, at an average cost of AUS$30 000 per YLD gained. Optimal treatment at current coverage could avert 20% of the burden, at an average cost of AUS$18 000 per YLD gained. Optimal treatment at optimal coverage could avert 28% of the burden, at AUS$16 000 per YLD gained. Sixty per cent of the burden of mental disorders was deemed to be unavertable. Conclusions: The efficiency of treatment varied more than tenfold across disorders. Although coverage of some of the more efficient treatments should be extended, other factors justify continued use of less-efficient treatments for some disorders.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1192/bjp.184.6.526

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Even with unlimited funding, three-quarters of the burden of schizophrenia would remain unavoidable.

    “In a utopian world, even if unlimited funding were available, three-quarters of the burden of schizophrenia would remain unavoidable [240].”

    From A Systematic Review of the Prevalence of Schizophrenia (2005) · cites this paper as [240]

  • With improved efficiencies within current services, 22% of the burden of schizophrenia can be reduced.

    “If we improve efficiencies within the current services, we can do somewhat better (22%).”

    From A Systematic Review of the Prevalence of Schizophrenia (2005) · cites this paper as [240]

  • With current interventions, only 13% of the burden of schizophrenia can be reduced.

    “For schizophrenia, with the current mix of interventions we can only reduce 13% of the burden.”

    From A Systematic Review of the Prevalence of Schizophrenia (2005) · cites this paper as [240]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Andrews, G., Issakidis, C., Sanderson, K., Corry, J., & Lapsley, H.
Affiliations
  • UNSW Sydney (AU)
  • Queensland University of Technology (AU)
  • The University of Queensland (AU)
Corresponding author
Andrews, Gavin
Venue
British Journal of Psychiatry
Published
2004-06
Volume
184
Issue
6
Pages
526-533
ISSN
  • 0007-1250 (ISSN-L)
  • 1472-1465
OpenAlex
W94943583
Cited by
560
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 42 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 38 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 35 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 34 · 2014: 29 · 2013: 31 · 2012: 24
FWCI
48.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The British Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • UEA Digital Repository (University of East Anglia) (submittedVersion)
  • Centre for Health Research; Faculty of Health; Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation
Funders
  • Medical Research Council
  • National Health and Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
Keywords
mental illness, cost-effectiveness, psychotherapy, disease burden, years lived with disability, mood disorders, anxiety disorders, alcoholism, schizophrenia, treatment coverage, public policy
MeSH terms
Anxiety Disorders, Australia, Mental Disorders, Bipolar Disorder, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Health Policy, Health Surveys, Humans, Mental Health Services, Psychoses, Alcoholic, Schizophrenia, Time Factors, Cost of Illness, Evidence-Based Medicine, Mood Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review