The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Progress in Cancer Screening Over a Decade: Results of Cancer Screening From the 1987, 1992, and 1998 National Health Interview Surveys
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Screening to detect cancer early, an increasingly important cancer control activity, cannot be effective unless it is widely used. METHODS: Use of Pap smears, mammography, fecal occult blood tests (FOBTs), sigmoidoscopy, and digital rectal examination (DRE) was evaluated in the 1987, 1992, and 1998 National Health Interview Surveys. Levels and trends in screening use were examined by sex, age, and racial/ethnic group. The effects of income, educational level, and health care coverage were examined within age groups. Logistic regression analyses of 1998 data were used to develop a parsimonious, policy-relevant model. RESULTS: Use of all screening modalities increased over the period examined; for mammography and DRE, the increase was more rapid in the first half of the decade; for the Pap test and sigmoidoscopy, the increase was more rapid in the second half of the decade. Levels of colorectal cancer screening (both sigmoidoscopy and FOBTs) in 1998 were less than the level that prevailed a decade earlier for mammography. Patterns of change for all screening modalities differed between age, sex, and racial/ethnic groups, but prevalence of use during the study, within recommended time intervals, was consistently lower among groups with lower income and less education. Logistic regression analyses indicated that insurance coverage and, to a greater extent, usual source of care had strong independent associations with screening usage when age, sex, racial/ethnic group, and educational level were taken into account. CONCLUSIONS: While cancer screening is generally increasing in the United States, usage is relatively low for colorectal cancer screening and among groups that lack health insurance or a usual source of care.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Yu, S. M. (1998) · Maternal and Child Health Journal · doi:10.1023/a:1021801927353 · Cited by 4,056
Bowman, P. W. (1963) · AIBS Bulletin · doi:10.2307/1292957 · Cited by 3,638
Healthy People 2000: National Health Promotion and Disease Prevention Objectives.
Heidel], [. (1991) · Population and Development Review · doi:10.2307/1971966 · Cited by 3,155
Colorectal cancer screening: Clinical guidelines and rationale
Winawer, S., Fletcher, R., Miller, L., Godlee, F., Stolar, M., Mulrow, C., Woolf, S., Glick, S., Ganiats, T., Bond, J., et al. (1997) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1053/gast.1997.v112.agast970594 · Cited by 1,612
(2001) · Technometrics · doi:10.1198/tech.2001.s612 · Cited by 989
Design and estimation for the National Health Interview Survey, 1995-2004
Botman, S., & Moriarity, C. L. (2000) · Cited by 785
Sullivan, L. W. (1990) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199010113231511 · Cited by 700
Demographic predictors of mammography and Pap smear screening in US women.
Calle, E. E., Flanders, W. D., Thun, M. J., & Martin, L. M. (1993) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.83.1.53 · Cited by 427
Concordance of Self-reported Data and Medical Record Audit for Six Cancer Screening Procedures
Gordon, N. P., Hiatt, R. A., & Lampert, D. I. (1993) · JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/85.7.566 · Cited by 415
Montaño, D. E., & Phillips, W. R. (1995) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.85.6.795 · Cited by 349
Cited by
Coverage of cervical cancer screening in 57 countries: low average levels and large inequalities
Gakidou, E., Nordhagen, S., & Obermeyer, Z. (2008) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0050132 · Cited by 976
Weir, H. K. (2003) · CancerSpectrum Knowledge Environment · doi:10.1093/jnci/djg040 · Cited by 867
Whitlock, E. P., Lin, J. S., Liles, E., Beil, T. L., & Fu, R. (2008) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-149-9-200811040-00245 · Cited by 845
Swan, J., Breen, N., Coates, R. J., Rimer, B. K., & Lee, N. C. (2003) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/cncr.11208 · Cited by 767
Self-citationCancer statistics for Hispanics/Latinos, 2012
Siegel, R., Naishadham, D., & Jemal, A. (2012) · CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians · doi:10.3322/caac.21153 · Cited by 655
Metadata
- Authors
- Breen, N., Wagener, D. K., Brown, M. L., Davis, W. W., & Ballard-Barbash, R.
- Venue
- JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2001-11-21
- Volume
- 93
- Issue
- 22
- Pages
- 1704-1713
- ISSN
- 0027-8874 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2105
- OpenAlex
- W2163722616
- Cited by
- 502
- References
- 24
- FWCI
- 17.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Progress in Cancer Screening Over a Decade: Results of Cancer Screening From the 1987, 1992, and 1998 National Health Interview Surveys. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/jnci/93.22.1704
- The paper
- Breen, N., Wagener, D. K., Brown, M. L., Davis, W. W., & Ballard-Barbash, R. (2001). Progress in Cancer Screening Over a Decade: Results of Cancer Screening From the 1987, 1992, and 1998 National Health Interview Surveys. JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/93.22.1704
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.