Cited by 130Maternal and Neonatal HealthcareMaternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumMaternal and Perinatal Health Interventions

A randomized trial of augmented prenatal care for multiple-risk, Medicaid-eligible African American women

Open access
Lorraine V. Klerman, Sharon Landesman Ramey, Renato Goldenberg, S Marbury, J Hou, Suzanne Cliver·2001·American Journal of Public Health

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This project investigated whether augmented prenatal care for high-risk African American women would improve pregnancy outcomes and patients' knowledge of risks, satisfaction with care, and behavior. METHODS: The women enrolled were African American, were eligible for Medicaid, had scored 10 or higher on a risk assessment scale, were 16 years or older, and had no major medical complications. They were randomly assigned to augmented care (n = 318) or usual care (n = 301). Augmented care included educationally oriented peer groups, additional appointments, extended time with clinicians, and other supports. RESULTS: Women in augmented care rated their care as more helpful, knew more about their risk conditions, and spent more time with their nurse-providers than did women in usual care. More smokers in augmented care quit smoking. Pregnancy outcomes did not differ significantly between the groups; however, among patients in augmented care, rates of preterm births were lower and cesarean deliveries and stays in neonatal intensive care units occurred in smaller proportions. Both groups had lower-than-predicted rates of low birthweight. CONCLUSIONS: High-quality prenatal care, emphasizing education, health promotion, and social support, significantly increased women's satisfaction, knowledge of risk conditions, and perceived mastery in their lives, but it did not reduce low birthweight.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2105/ajph.91.1.105

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Klerman, L. V., Ramey, S. L., Goldenberg, R., Marbury, S., Hou, J., & Cliver, S.
Affiliations
University of Alabama at Birmingham (US)
Venue
American Journal of Public Health
Published
2001-01-01
Volume
91
Issue
1
Pages
105-111
ISSN
  • 0090-0036 (ISSN-L)
  • 1541-0048
OpenAlex
W2138670652
Cited by
130
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 5
FWCI
17.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Public Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Civitan International
  • U.S. Public Health Service (MC J9040, 290-92-0055)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
Keywords
high-risk pregnancy, African American women, peer support groups, patient education, patient satisfaction, smoking cessation, preterm birth, cesarean section, neonatal intensive care, low birth weight, health promotion, social support, perceived mastery
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Alabama, Black or African American, Female, Humans, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Medicaid, Patient Education as Topic, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Outcome, Prenatal Care, Prospective Studies, Social Support, United States, Patient Satisfaction, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Pregnancy, High-Risk

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review