Cited by 88Mobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsMedia Influence and HealthHealth Literacy and Information Accessibility

Reaching Women through Health Information Technology: The Gabby Preconception Care System

Open access
Gardiner, Paula, Hempstead, Megan B., Ring, Lazlo, Bickmore, Timothy, Yinusa-Nyahkoon, Leanne, Tran, Huong, Paasche-Orlow, Michael, Damus, Karla +1 more·2013·American Journal of Health Promotion

Abstract

Purpose.: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention have endorsed the concept of preconception care (PCC). New tools must be developed to promote PCC. Design.: Development and testing of a health information technology system to provide PCC. Setting.: An urban safety net hospital and an urban university. Subjects.: Community recruitment of 31 women in focus groups and 15 women participating in observed usability testing; 9 students recruited from the Office of Minority Health Preconception Peer Educators program participated in pilot testing for 2 months. Intervention.: Online interactive animated character (“Gabby”) designed to identify and modify preconception risks. Measures.: Qualitative transcripts, preconception risk assessment, server data for system usage, self-administered satisfaction surveys, and follow-up phone calls. Analysis.: Descriptive statistics of subjects' demographics, satisfaction, PCC risks, and system usage. Transcripts coded using NVIVO. Results.: Subjects (n = 24) reported an average of 23 preconception risks; in the pilot, 83% of risks added to the “My Health To-Do List” were addressed by the subject. Seventy-three percent of risks identified as contemplative progressed to action or maintenance. Differences were noted in effectiveness of the system based on initial stage of change for each risk. Conclusion.: Results suggest that the PCC system could be effective in influencing positive behavior change. Adding stage of change–focused functionality might have added benefits. This system has great potential to assist in the delivery of PCC.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

The Gabby Preconception Care System is an online animated virtual patient advocate designed to screen for and address preconception risks in young women. Early focus group, usability, and 2-month pilot testing suggest the system is acceptable and may support behavior change, though pilot sample size and self-report limit conclusions.

Key findings

  • Across usability and pilot participants combined (n=24), women reported an average of 23 preconception risks each (range 13–37), with 550 total individual risks identified; the risk assessment took less than 12 minutes on average.
  • In the 2-month pilot, 6 of 9 participants logged in at least once, for 63 total sessions (average 10.5 sessions per participant; maximum 18; average session length 12 minutes, range 2–32). Of 128 risks identified among these 6 users, 67 (52%) were discussed with Gabby and 43 (64% of discussed risks) were added to the “My Health To-Do List.”
  • At follow-up, participants reported that 83% of risks added to the “My Health To-Do List” were either resolved (54%) or had some action taken (29%). Stage-of-change analysis showed 73% of risks starting in contemplation progressed to action or maintenance, and almost 92% of risks starting in action or maintenance remained there; however, only 1 of 16 precontemplative risks was added to the list, and 10 of 19 risks starting in preparation regressed to precontemplation or contemplation.
  • Satisfaction data from usability and pilot participants at first use (n=24) showed 19 of 24 thought the risk assessment was useful, 22 of 24 found it user-friendly, 16 of 24 found it an appropriate length, 17 of 24 trusted Gabby, 15 of 24 thought it was easy to talk with her, and 17 of 24 thought they would use information from Gabby to improve their health.

Methods

  • The Gabby system was developed and tested in four phases: development; eight focus groups with 31 English-speaking African American women aged 15–22 recruited from community sites; individual observed usability testing with 15 African American women aged 15–25; and a 2-month pilot with 9 women aged 18–25 recruited from the Office of Minority Health Preconception Peer Educator program.
  • Gabby is a web-based virtual patient advocate that screens for preconception risks across 12 domains and over 100 risk factors, assesses stage of change for each risk using the Transtheoretical Model, provides tailored education, and helps users create a “My Health To-Do List.”
  • Analysis included descriptive statistics of demographics, satisfaction, preconception risks, and system usage; focus group and usability transcripts were coded using NVIVO, with 74 content codes from focus groups and 44 from usability testing. Pilot follow-up phone calls collected updated stage of change and risk outcomes.

Limitations

  • The paper states that the pilot test sample was low, recruitment was limited to a half-day at a PPE training, and the participant pool was too small to test whether the system had different effects by race; although developed for an African American target population, the reported results included participants of various races.
  • The paper states that participants recruited from the PPE population may have been more interested, informed, and motivated to improve preconception health than the general target population.
  • The paper states that all health information was self-reported and could be inaccurate due to lack of knowledge, discomfort sharing information with the computer or researcher, or social desirability bias, specifically possibly influencing the finding that 83% of risks were resolved or acted upon. Evident from the text: the pilot was uncontrolled and short-term, and several findings rely on small subsamples.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4278/ajhp.1200113-quan-18

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

0 of 26 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Findingown data

    Seventy-three percent of risks initially classified as Contemplative moved to Action or Maintenance.

    “73% of risks identified as Contemplative progressed to Action or Maintenance”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The pilot participants' self-reported risk resolution and stage-of-change progression accurately reflect their actual behavior change.
  • Findingown data

    The system's effectiveness varied according to the initial stage of change for each risk.

    “Differences were noted in effectiveness of the system based on initial stage of change for each risk.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The pilot participants' self-reported risk resolution and stage-of-change progression accurately reflect their actual behavior change.
  • Findingown data

    In the study, the 24 subjects reported an average of 23 preconception risks.

    “Subjects (n=24) reported an average of 23 preconception risks”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingown data

    During the pilot, 83% of the risks that were added to the My Health To-Do List were addressed by the participant.

    “in the pilot, 83% of risks added to the “My Health To-Do List” were addressed by the subject”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The pilot participants' self-reported risk resolution and stage-of-change progression accurately reflect their actual behavior change.
  • Findingown data

    Focus group findings indicate that participants preferred a virtual patient advocate character that matched their racial and ethnic background.

    “Findings suggest that participants prefer a VPA character that resembles their racial and ethnic background.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims. 27
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 21
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Focus group participants found the preconception risk assessment's language understandable and its format well-designed, but they proposed some changes.

    “Focus group participants found that the language in the preconception risk assessment was understandable and the format was well-designed but suggested some changes.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Participants emphasized that the virtual patient advocate should have style and layers and look like a young adult seen on the street, and they suggested adding a stylish haircut, accessories such as jewelry or glasses, and subtle makeup.

    “participants also highlighted the importance of the VPA having style and layers, and looking like a young adult they might see walking down the street, and therefore suggested that a stylish haircut, accessories (e.g. jewelry, glasses), and subtle makeup be added to the existing VPA.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    Participants recommended adding an Information button for extra explanation about a question when needed.

    “participants recommended adding an “Information” button where they could receive an additional explanation about a question, if needed.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    Participants suggested that a uniform or fitted professional shirt, name badge, or stethoscope could symbolize the virtual patient advocate's role as a young female health care professional.

    “suggested this could be symbolized by a uniform or fitted professional shirt, name badge, or stethoscope.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The analysis identified 74 content codes from focus group topics and 44 content codes from usability testing.

    “A total of 74 content codes were identified from the topics discussed during focus groups, and 44 content codes from usability testing.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Participants wanted the virtual patient advocate to have a modern name, and the group agreed on the name Gabby.

    “Participants also suggested that the VPA have a modern name, and consensus decided the name “Gabby” (Figure 1).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Several participants had trouble with the BMI question that asked for height in inches and suggested separate boxes for feet and inches.

    “one question that calculates BMI asks participants to enter their height in inches. Several participants reported difficulty with this calculation and suggested including two separate response boxes for feet and inches.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Participants proposed letting users complete the questionnaire over multiple sessions and adding a progress bar to show completion progress and improve usability.

    “Participants also suggested allowing users to complete the questionnaire in multiple sessions, and adding a progress bar to visually represent their progress in completing the risk assessment to improve usability.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Usability testing participants did not find the story-telling function intuitive, so a simpler interface was made before the pilot began.

    “the usability testing participants did not report the story-telling function to be intuitive, so a simpler interface was created prior to the start of the pilot test.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    There were a total of 63 sessions, an average of 10.5 sessions per participant.

    “for a total of 63 sessions, an average of 10.5 sessions per participant.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    There were 550 total individual risks identified.

    “There were 550 total individual risks identified”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The average session lasted twelve minutes, with a range from two to 32 minutes.

    “The average session lasted twelve minutes, with a range from two to 32 minutes.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Combining usability and pilot participants at first use (n=24), most trusted Gabby (17 of 24).

    “most participants trusted Gabby (17 of 24)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The average number of risks identified per woman was 23, with a range of 13 to 37.

    “the average number of risks identified per woman was 23, with a range of 13 to 37 risks.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Adding functionality focused on stage of change could provide additional benefits.

    “Adding stage of change-focused functionality might have added benefits.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The pilot participants' self-reported risk resolution and stage-of-change progression accurately reflect their actual behavior change.
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Preconception care has been discussed for over 20 years, but implementation in clinical practice has advanced only modestly despite broad interest.

    “PCC concepts have been discussed for more than 20 years, but despite broad interest8 there has been only modest progress in implementing these concepts into clinical practice.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [8] Jack BW Culpepper L Preconception care: risk reduction and health promotion in preparation for pregnancy Journal of the American Medical Association 1990 264 9 1147 1149 2384939 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    Gabby's script content was adapted from CDC workgroup material and written at a sixth-grade reading level.

    “The Gabby script content is adapted from the information prepared by the CDC workgroup and written at a 6th grade reading level.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductcitation

    The Gabby system's online preconception risk assessment was built from risk assessment tools used in earlier studies and updated according to published CDC clinical work group guidance.

    “The Gabby system’s online preconception risk assessment is based on risk assessment tools used in prior studies20 and updated based on the published work of the CDC clinical work group.12”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [20] Jack BW Culpepper L Babcock J Kogan M Wesimiller D Addressing preconception risks at the time of a negative pregnancy test? a randomized trial Journal of Family Practice 1998 47 33 38 9673606

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [12] Jack BW Atrash H Coonrod DV Moos M-K O’Donnell JK Johnson K The clinical content of preconception care: an overview and preparation of this supplement Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008 199 Suppl S266 279 19081421 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Virtual patient advocates are well suited to deliver preconception care because they can reach many patients, reduce clinician time demands, control costs, and achieve high acceptability through culturally appropriate and low-health-literacy-appropriate content.

    “VPAs are ideal for delivering PCC because they can potentially reach a large number of patients, alleviate clinician time restraints, and control costs while simultaneously having high patient acceptability through culturally appropriate content17 and information appropriate to those with low health literacy.18, 19”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [17] King A Bickmore T Campero M Pruitt L Yin L Employing ’Virtual Advisors’ in Preventive Care for Underserved Communities: Results from the COMPASS Study Journal of Health Communication (to appear) PMC7187757 23941610 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [18] Bickmore T Pfeifer L Jack B Taking the time to care: empowering low health literacy hospital patients with virtual nurse agents Computers in Medicine 2009 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [19] Bickmore TW Pfeifer LM Byron D Usability of conversational agents by patients with inadequate health literacy: evidence from two clinical trials J Health Commun 2010 15 Suppl 2 197 210 20845204 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Even though early prenatal care became more accessible over the past 20 years, outcomes did not improve.

    “Despite increased access to early prenatal care over the course of the past 20 years, outcomes have not improved.5,6”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [5] Klerman LV Ramey SL Goldenberg RL Marbury S Hou J Cliver SP A randomized trial of augmented prenatal care for multiple-risk, medicaid-eligible African American women Am J Public Health 2001 91 1 105 111 11189800 PMC1446489 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [6] Stevens-Simon C Orleans M Low-birthweight prevention programs: the enigma of failure Birth 1999 26 3 184 191 10655819 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    Members of the CDC Select Panel on Preconception Care clinical committee reviewed and edited the Gabby risk assessment within their clinical expertise.

    “In addition, the Gabby risk assessment was reviewed and edited by members of the clinical committee of the CDC Select Panel on Preconception Care in the areas of their clinical expertise.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The virtual patient advocate mimics an empathic clinician's face-to-face conversation, including gaze, posture, and hand gestures, to deliver tailored patient education, check comprehension, and track progress.

    “The VPA emulates the face-to-face conversational behavior of an empathic clinician, including nonverbal communicative behavior such as gaze, posture, and hand gestures to deliver patient education messages tailored to individual needs, assess patient comprehension, and record progress.14, 15, 16”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [14] Bickmore T Gruber A Picard R Establishing the computer-patient working alliance in automated health behavior change interventions Patient Education and Counseling 2005 59 21 30 16198215 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [15] Bickmore T Giorgino T Health dialog systems for patients and consumers Journal of Biomedical Informatics 2006 39 556 571 16464643 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [16] Bickmore T Pfeifer L Relational agents for antipsychotic medication adherence Proceedings of the CHI’08 Workshop on Technology in Mental Health 4 6 2008 Florence, Italy

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    Focus group transcript analysis started after the first group so early findings could shape initial programming, which later focus group participants then reviewed and gave feedback on.

    “Analysis of focus group transcripts began after the first focus group so that early findings could inform initial programming, which participants in later focus groups reviewed and provided feedback on.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Evidence indicates that health information technology improves healthcare access by streamlining services, reducing geographic barriers, and tailoring education and promotion to patients' health literacy, values, and cultural and linguistic preferences.

    “Emerging evidence suggests that HIT increases access to healthcare by streamlining clinical services, reducing barriers such as remote geographic location, and tailoring patient education and health promotion messages to fit patients’ health literacy levels, personal values, and cultural and linguistic preferences.13”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [13] Bickmore T Pfiefer L Yin L The role of gesture in document explanation by embodied conversation agents International Journal of Semantic Computing 2008 2 1 47 70

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    Before participants heard about a risk, their stage of change for that risk was assessed using the Transtheoretical Model.

    “Prior to hearing information about a risk, the participant’s stage of change from the Transtheoretical Model23 for that risk was assessed.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [23] National Cancer Institute Theory at a glance: a guide for health promotion practice 2 US Department Health and Human Services 2005

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The CDC's Select Panel on Preconception Care published a guiding vision for preconception health and healthcare in 2006.

    “In 2006, the Select Panel on Preconception Care, formed by the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), published the guiding vision for preconception health and healthcare.11”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [11] Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Recommendations for improving preconception health and health care—United States: a report of the CC/ATSDR preconception care workgroup and the select panel on preconception care Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Reports 2006 55 RR-6 1 23 16617292

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductcitation

    The risk assessment covers 12 preconception care domains and more than 100 individual risk factors drawn from the AJOG preconception health supplement.

    “The risk assessment instrument records information in 12 domains of preconception care and includes over 100 individual risk factors, derived from the risks selected for the American Journal of Obstetric and Gynecology (AJOG) supplement for Preconception Health and Health Care.21”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [21] Jack B Atrash H Preconception health and health care: the clinical content of preconception care AJOG 12 2008 199 6 Supplement B

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Most women recognize the value of optimizing health before pregnancy and most doctors consider preconception care important, yet few obstetrician-gynecologists or family physicians deliver comprehensive preconception care.

    “Although most women understand the importance of optimizing their health before pregnancy and most physicians think PCC is important, few obstetricians/gynecologists or family physicians provide comprehensive PCC to their patients.9, 10”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [9] Henderson JT Weisman CS Grason H Are two doctors better than one? women’s physician use and appropriate care Women’s Health Issues 2002 12 138 149 12015186 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [10] Williams J Abelman S Fassett E Health care provider knowledge and practices regarding folic acid: United States, 2002-2003 [electronic version] Maternal and Child Health Journal 2006 10 suppl S67 S72 16721664 PMC1592153 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    Two research team members coded each transcript, and disagreements were resolved using evidence from the transcripts.

    “Two research team members coded each transcript, and coding discrepancies were reconciled using supportive evidence from transcripts.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Preliminary data on the Gabby system are very encouraging and show that an automated system may be able to improve the quality, reach, delivery, acceptability, and high cost of preconception care.

    “Preliminary data on the Gabby system are very encouraging and show that an automated system may be able to improve the quality, reach, delivery, acceptability, and high cost of preconception care.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductreasoning

    The finding that 83 percent of risks were either resolved or the participant had taken action at the two-month follow-up could have been influenced by social desirability bias.

    “the finding that 83 percent of risks were either resolved or the participant had taken action at the two-month follow-up could have been influenced by social desirability bias.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationcitation

    African American women might particularly benefit from a HIT system designed for their use.

    “It is also possible that African American women might particularly benefit from a HIT system designed for their use.27”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [27] Baylor AL Shen E Huang X Which pedagogical agent do learners choose? the effects of gender and ethnicity E-Learn (World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, & Higher Education) 2003 Phoenix, Arizona

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    The Gabby system can address problems of fidelity of message, scale, ease of delivery, quality, clinician time restraints, and patient acceptability.

    “can address problems of fidelity of message, scale, ease of delivery, quality, clinician time restraints, and patient acceptability.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Study design and conductnone given

    It is possible that participants recruited from the PPE population were more interested and informed about health and more motivated to improve their preconception health status.

    “It is also possible that participants recruited from the PPE population were more interested and informed about health and more motivated to improve their preconception health status.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Participants felt the system was useful, easy to use, took an appropriate amount of time, trustworthy, and reliable.

    “The participants felt that the system was useful, easy to use, took an appropriate amount of time, trustworthy, and reliable.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductnone given

    Recruitment of subjects was limited to a half-day at a PPE training.

    “Recruitment of subjects was limited to a half-day at a PPE training.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    The focus groups supported the conclusion that the web-based system is culturally appropriate, familiar, and workable for delivering health risk assessment and interventions.

    “Focus group findings confirmed that our web-based system is a culturally relevant, familiar, and viable method for delivering a health risk assessment and interventions”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    A web-based system is a familiar and viable method for delivering health risk assessment and interventions to young African American women.

    “A web-based system is a familiar and viable method for delivering health risk assessment and interventions to young African American women”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The focus group participants' internet access is representative of the target population of young African American women.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    The Gabby system can be used across a range of health care, educational and community settings.

    “Finally, it can be used across a range of health care, educational and community settings.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
39 of 39
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The pilot participants' self-reported risk resolution and stage-of-change progression accurately reflect their actual behavior change.

    “Women participating in the pilot study received a follow-up phone call two months after enrollment to collect updated stage of change for each risk, using the same questions and answer choices as described above. Additionally, the participants reported the outcome of each risk (i.e. resolved, action taken, or no action taken) or reported their belief that the risk was falsely identified.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The nine OMH PPE pilot participants are representative of the target population of young African American women.

    “From a group of 32 students undergoing PPE training at Northeastern University, we recruited nine women between the ages of 18-25, who reported that they had access to a computer with internet access, had a telephone, and were willing to receive a follow-up telephone call from the investigators two months after beginning the online interaction(s) with Gabby.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The preconception risks identified by the Gabby system are clinically meaningful and important.

    “There were many important risks that were identified.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The changes in stage of change observed in the pilot are attributable to the Gabby system rather than other factors.

    “suggesting that the Gabby system was effective for that group.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The focus group participants' internet access is representative of the target population of young African American women.

    “as focus group participants all reported to have internet access via their home computer/laptop, smartphone, or both”
5 of 5

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Focus-group internet access reported as both 97% and all participants

    Minor

    The results state that 97 percent of focus-group participants had internet access, but the discussion says all focus-group participants did.

1 of 1

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), 2006, MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep., 55, 1
  2. Jack BW, 1998, J Fam Pract., 47, 33
  3. Jack B, 2008, Am J Obstet Gynecol, 199, S257, 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.07.067 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Institute of Medicine (IOM), 2003, Unequal Treatment: Confronting Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Healthcare
  5. Baylor AL, 2003, Paper presented at: E-Learn World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gardiner, P., Hempstead, M. B., Ring, L., Bickmore, T., Yinusa-Nyahkoon, L., Tran, H., Paasche-Orlow, M., Damus, K., & Jack, B.
Affiliations
  • Boston Medical Center (US)
  • Boston University (US)
  • Northeastern University (US)
Corresponding author
Gardiner, Paula
Venue
American Journal of Health Promotion
Published
2013-01
Volume
27
Issue
3_suppl
Pages
eS11-eS20
ISSN
  • 0890-1171 (ISSN-L)
  • 2168-6602
OpenAlex
W2006653872
Cited by
88
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 1
FWCI
6.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Health Promotion (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • The Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) Network (American Medical Association) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (K07AT005463)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Media Influence and Health
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
Keywords
preconception care, health information technology, online health interventions, stages of change, behavior change, women's health, minority health, usability testing, safety-net hospitals
MeSH terms
Boston, Consumer Behavior, Female, Humans, Medical Informatics, Pilot Projects, Surveys and Questionnaires, Teaching, United States, User-Computer Interface, Preconception Care, Focus Groups, Risk Assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-07.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-07.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review