The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Biochemical studies on repair cartilage resurfacing experimental defects in the rabbit knee.
Abstract
UNLABELLED: Wounds penetrating articular cartilage to bone heal with cartilage described variably as either fibrous or hyaline. In the present study, such repair cartilage was induced in the rabbit for biochemical comparison with normal articular cartilage. The main collagen in the repair tissue after three weeks was type I. By six to eight weeks, type II had become predominant and continued to be enriched up to one year; but type I still persisted as a significant constituent of the repair tissue even after a year, so the repair cartilage never fully resembled normal articular cartilage. From radiochemical analysis, type II was determined to be the major collagen synthesized by the repair tissue after three to four weeks. After six months, the repair cartilage contained more collagen and less hexosamine than control cartilage, suggesting that the fibrous texture that often developed was due to a loss of proteoglycans rather than to a change in the type of collagen. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Procedures capable of inducing the differentiation of authentic articular cartilage to resurface degenerated human joints would be invaluable. Surgical methods, such as drilling through to subchondral bone, are often attempted. It is not known, however, whether the cartilage that forms is true articular cartilage or, for example, fibrocartilage. The present experimental study in rabbits compared the properties of such repair cartilage with those of normal articular cartilage.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Stem cell homing in musculoskeletal injury
Fong, E. L. S., Chan, C. K., & Goodman, S. B. (2011) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.08.101 · Cited by 212
The osteochondral dilemma: Review of current management and future trends
Ye, K., Di Bella, C., Myers, D. E., & Choong, P. F. M. (2014) · ANZ Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1111/ans.12108 · Cited by 44
Platelet-rich plasma treatment for talar cartilage repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Peng, J., Wang, Q., Xu, Y., & He, H. (2023) · BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders · doi:10.1186/s12891-023-06466-y · Cited by 13
Metadata
- Authors
- Furukawa, T., Eyre, D. R., Koide, S., & Glimcher, M. J.
- Venue
- The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery
- Published
- 1980-01
- Volume
- 62
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 79-89
- ISSN
- 0021-9355 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W163550638
- Cited by
- 486
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.