The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Tendon-healing to cortical bone compared with healing to a cancellous trough. A biomechanical and histological evaluation in goats.
Abstract
This study was performed to test the hypothesis that attaching a tendon to a trough in cancellous bone results in tendon-healing that is biomechanically superior to that after direct fixation of a tendon to cortical bone. Twenty adult female goats were treated with a bilateral tenotomy of the infraspinatus tendon with subsequent reattachment of the tendon. In shoulders randomized to the cancellous-fixation group, a cancellous bed was prepared with a motorized burr and a template measuring twenty by five by five millimeters. The repair in the shoulders randomized to the cortical-fixation group was performed in the same manner, except that the tendon was attached to cortical bone. Three outcome measures were assessed, six and twelve weeks after the repair, with the Student paired t test and analysis of variance: load to failure, energy to failure, and stiffness. The types of repair were not significantly different with regard to any of the three outcomes. When the six and twelve-week data were combined, an average difference in load to failure of 3.9 per cent in favor of cancellous repair was observed but it was not significant (p = 0.78). The associated 95 per cent confidence interval for the difference ranged from 10.5 per cent in favor of cortical repair to 18.3 per cent in favor of cancellous repair. Histological analysis at six and twelve weeks revealed progressive maturation and reorganization of the bone-tendon interface with re-establishment of collagen-fiber continuity between the tendon and bone. This process was indistinguishable between the cortical and cancellous specimens. This study demonstrated no significant benefit from the creation of a trough to expose the tendon to cancellous bone. In this model, at both six and twelve weeks, the tendon-to-bone healing process of the two groups appeared similar and the biomechanical properties were approximately equal.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Tendon healing in a bone tunnel. Part II
Weiler, A., Hoffmann, R. F. G., Bail, H. J., Rehm, O., & Südkamp, N. P. (2002) · Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery · doi:10.1053/jars.2002.30657 · Cited by 481
Functional Attachment of Soft Tissues to Bone: Development, Healing, and Tissue Engineering
Lu, H. H., & Thomopoulos, S. (2013) · Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1146/annurev-bioeng-071910-124656 · Cited by 447
Thomopoulos, S., Williams, G. R., & Soslowsky, L. J. (2003) · Journal of Biomechanical Engineering · doi:10.1115/1.1536660 · Cited by 434
Characteristics of the rat supraspinatus tendon during tendon‐to‐bone healing after acute injury
Galatz, L. M., Sandell, L. J., Rothermich, S. Y., Das, R., Mastny, A., Havlioglu, N., Silva, M. J., & Thomopoulos, S. (2006) · Journal of Orthopaedic Research · doi:10.1002/jor.20067 · Cited by 329
Dejardin, L. M., Arnoczky, S. P., Ewers, B. J., Haut, R. C., & Clarke, R. B. (2001) · The American Journal of Sports Medicine · doi:10.1177/03635465010290021001 · Cited by 276
Metadata
- Authors
- St Pierre, P., Olson, E. J., Elliott, J. J., OʼHair, K. C., McKinney, L. A., & Ryan, J.
- Venue
- The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery
- Published
- 1995-12
- Volume
- 77
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1858-1866
- ISSN
- 0021-9355 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W66749116
- Cited by
- 262
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Tendon-healing to cortical bone compared with healing to a cancellous trough. A biomechanical and histological evaluation in goats. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2106/00004623-199512000-00010
- The paper
- St Pierre, P., Olson, E. J., Elliott, J. J., OʼHair, K. C., McKinney, L. A., & Ryan, J. (1995). Tendon-healing to cortical bone compared with healing to a cancellous trough. A biomechanical and histological evaluation in goats. The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-199512000-00010
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.