The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Tissue-Engineered Rotator Cuff Tendon Using Porcine Small Intestine Submucosa: Histologic and Mechanical Evaluation in Dogs
Abstract
To determine its efficacy in stimulating the regeneration of a rotator cuff tendon, an implant of 10-ply porcine small intestinal submucosa was used to replace a completely resected infraspinatus tendon in 21 adult mongrel dogs. The contralateral infraspinatus tendon was elevated and then reattached to the greater tubercle with sutures to mimic conventional repair (sham operation). Mechanical evaluations were performed at 0, 3, and 6 months (five specimens at each time period). Histologic comparisons were made at 3 and 6 months (three specimens). At both times, the gross appearance, histologic continuity, and failure mode of the constructs mimicked those of sham-operated and native infraspinatus tendons, thus suggesting host tissue ingrowth and implant remodeling with solid integration of the regenerated tissue to muscular and bony interfaces. Tissue ingrowth occurred without histologic evidence of foreign body or immune-mediated reactions or adhesions to peripheral tissues. Sham operations simulated tendon mobilization and reimplantation procedures routinely performed to treat chronic rotator cuff tendon injuries. Although the ultimate strength of small intestinal submucosa-regenerated tendons was significantly less than that of native infraspinatus tendons (P<0.001), it was similar to that of reimplanted tendons at 3 (P<0.05) and 6 months (P<0.05).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Extracellular matrix-based materials for regenerative medicine
Hussey, G. S., Dziki, J. L., & Badylak, S. F. (2018) · Nature Reviews Materials · doi:10.1038/s41578-018-0023-x · Cited by 844
Xenogeneic extracellular matrix as a scaffold for tissue reconstruction
Badylak, S. F. (2004) · Transplant Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.trim.2003.12.016 · Cited by 747
Consequences of ineffective decellularization of biologic scaffolds on the host response
Keane, T. J., Londono, R., Turner, N. J., & Badylak, S. F. (2012) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.10.054 · Cited by 613
Macrophage Participation in the Degradation and Remodeling of Extracellular Matrix Scaffolds
Valentin, J. E., Stewart-Akers, A. M., Gilbert, T. W., & Badylak, S. F. (2009) · Tissue Engineering Part A · doi:10.1089/ten.tea.2008.0419 · Cited by 356
Extracellular Matrix-Based Biomaterials and Their Influence Upon Cell Behavior
Cramer, M. C., & Badylak, S. F. (2020) · Annals of Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1007/s10439-019-02408-9 · Cited by 196
Metadata
- Authors
- Dejardin, L. M., Arnoczky, S. P., Ewers, B. J., Haut, R. C., & Clarke, R. B.
- Venue
- The American Journal of Sports Medicine
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2001-03
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 175-184
- ISSN
- 0363-5465 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-3365
- OpenAlex
- W1875588079
- Cited by
- 276
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Tissue-Engineered Rotator Cuff Tendon Using Porcine Small Intestine Submucosa: Histologic and Mechanical Evaluation in Dogs. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/03635465010290021001
- The paper
- Dejardin, L. M., Arnoczky, S. P., Ewers, B. J., Haut, R. C., & Clarke, R. B. (2001). Tissue-Engineered Rotator Cuff Tendon Using Porcine Small Intestine Submucosa: Histologic and Mechanical Evaluation in Dogs. The American Journal of Sports Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1177/03635465010290021001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.