Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 434

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Quantitative Assessment of Walking Activity after Total Hip or Knee Replacement*

SCHMALZRIED, THOMAS P., SZUSZCZEWICZ, EDWARD S., NORTHFIELD, MARK R., AKIZUKI, KENNETH H., FRANKEL, RYAN E., BELCHER, GREG, AMSTUTZ, HARLAN C.·1998·The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery

Abstract

Accumulating data suggest that the amount of use, and not simply the duration in situ, influences the wear and survival of total joint replacements. An electronic, digital pedometer was used to record the number of steps taken by 111 non-randomized volunteers who had had at least one total hip or knee replacement. The patients averaged 4988 steps per day, which extrapolates to approximately 0.9 million cycles per year for each joint of the lower extremity. Average activity ranged widely from 395 to 17,718 steps per day, an approximately forty-five-fold difference. The most active patient walked more than 3.5 times the average number of steps per day. Age was significantly associated with activity (p = 0.048), but there was a high degree of variability (standard deviation, 3040 steps per day). Patients who were less than sixty years old walked 30 per cent more on average than those who were sixty years old or more (p = 0.023). Men walked 28 per cent more on average than women (p = 0.037), and men who were less than sixty years old walked 40 per cent more on average than the rest of the patients (p = 0.011). These data indicate that individual differences in the activity of the patient can be a substantial source of variability in rates of polyethylene wear in vivo. The pedometer is an inexpensive investigational tool with many potential applications, including standardizing wear measurements of joint replacements on the basis of gait cycles rather than time. This quantitative approach may provide prognostic information regarding the survival of joint prostheses. Pedometer data may also be useful for quantitative assessment of walking ability in outcome studies.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2106/00004623-199801000-00010

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 11 references

Cited by

See all 434

Metadata

Authors
SCHMALZRIED, T. P., SZUSZCZEWICZ, E. S., NORTHFIELD, M. R., AKIZUKI, K. H., FRANKEL, R. E., BELCHER, G., & AMSTUTZ, H. C.
Venue
The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery
Published
1998-01
Volume
80
Issue
1
Pages
54-9
ISSN
0021-9355 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4245480758
Cited by
434
References
11
FWCI
14.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Quantitative Assessment of Walking Activity after Total Hip or Knee Replacement*. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2106/00004623-199801000-00010
The paper
SCHMALZRIED, T. P., SZUSZCZEWICZ, E. S., NORTHFIELD, M. R., AKIZUKI, K. H., FRANKEL, R. E., BELCHER, G., & AMSTUTZ, H. C. (1998). Quantitative Assessment of Walking Activity after Total Hip or Knee Replacement*. The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-199801000-00010

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.