The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Delivery Systems for BMPs: Factors Contributing to Protein Retention at an Application Site
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Recombinant human bone morphogenetic proteins (rhBMPs) are being tested in clinical studies for their capacity to elicit bone formation. Biomaterials used in delivery systems also play a critical role in supporting the osteoinductive activity of BMPs, attributable to the controlled presentation of the BMPs to target cells. Despite extensive preclinical studies, the factors contributing to local rhBMP pharmacokinetics remain to be elucidated. METHODS: The rhBMP pharmacokinetics were studied in a rat subcutaneous implant and in an intramuscular injection model. In situ levels of rhBMPs were quantitated with use of 125I-labeled tracers. The effects of protein structural features and the nature of the biomaterial implant were explored. Osteoinduction by biomaterial+rhBMP combinations was assessed by a semiquantitative, histology-based bone score. RESULTS: With the use of rhBMP-2, rhBMP-4, and an N-truncated rhBMP-2, the protein isoelectric point was found critical for the initial retention of rhBMPs in an implant. Osteoinduction studies carried out in parallel indicated that rhBMPs with a higher implant retention elicited more bone formation. In the clinically used collagen+rhBMP-2 device, collagen crosslinking and sterilization were most influential in rhBMP-2 retention. To increase retention at an application site, thermoreversible polymers were engineered and shown to enhance local rhBMP-2 retention, especially by injectable delivery. CONCLUSIONS: Two critical components of an osteoinductive device--namely, the biomaterial and the rhBMP--were shown to influence local protein pharmacokinetics and osteoinductive activity of the device. Designer biomaterials can provide an additional mechanism to modulate local protein pharmacokinetics. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: These studies form the foundation of next-generation osteoinductive devices with improved potency at sites of desired bone regeneration and reduced side effects at other sites.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Yamamoto, M., Takahashi, Y., & Tabata, Y. (2003) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/s0142-9612(03)00337-5 · Cited by 334
Effects of protein dose and delivery system on BMP-mediated bone regeneration
Boerckel, J. D., Kolambkar, Y. M., Dupont, K. M., Uhrig, B. A., Phelps, E. A., Stevens, H. Y., García, A. J., & Guldberg, R. E. (2011) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.03.063 · Cited by 323
Kowalczewski, C. J., Tombyln, S., Wasnick, D. C., Hughes, M. R., Ellenburg, M. D., Callahan, M. F., Smith, T. L., Van Dyke, M. E., Burnett, L. R., & Saul, J. M. (2014) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.12.087 · Cited by 58
Zhang, X., Yu, Q., Wang, Y.-A., & Zhao, J. (2018) · International Journal of Nanomedicine · doi:10.2147/ijn.s150875 · Cited by 25
Metadata
- Authors
- Uludag, H., Gao, T., Porter, T. J., Friess, W., & Wozney, J. M.
- Venue
- The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-American Volume
- Published
- 2001
- Volume
- 83
- Issue
- Pt 2
- Pages
- S1-128-S1-135
- ISSN
- 0021-9355 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2165097526
- Cited by
- 206
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Delivery Systems for BMPs: Factors Contributing to Protein Retention at an Application Site. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2106/00004623-200100002-00007
- The paper
- Uludag, H., Gao, T., Porter, T. J., Friess, W., & Wozney, J. M. (2001). Delivery Systems for BMPs: Factors Contributing to Protein Retention at an Application Site. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-American Volume. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-200100002-00007
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.