Cited by 58Bone Tissue Engineering MaterialsSilk-based biomaterials and applicationsCollagen: Extraction and Characterization

Reduction of ectopic bone growth in critically-sized rat mandible defects by delivery of rhBMP-2 from kerateine biomaterials

Open access
Kowalczewski, Christine J., Tombyln, Seth, Wasnick, David C., Hughes, Michael R., Ellenburg, Mary D., Callahan, Michael F., Smith, Thomas L., Van Dyke, Mark E. +2 more·2014·Biomaterials

Abstract

Absorbable collagen sponges (ACS) are used clinically as carriers of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein 2 (rhBMP-2) to promote bone regeneration. ACS exhibit ectopic bone growth due to delivery of supraphysiological levels of rhBMP-2, which is particularly problematic in craniofacial bone injuries for both functional and esthetic reasons. We hypothesized that hydrogels from the reduced form of keratin proteins (kerateine) would serve as a suitable alternative to ACS carriers of rhBMP-2. The rationale for this hypothesis is that keratin biomaterials degrade slowly in vivo, have modifiable material properties, and have demonstrated capacity to deliver therapeutic agents. We investigated kerateine hydrogels and freeze-dried scaffolds as rhBMP-2 carriers in a critically-sized rat mandibular defect model. ACS, kerateine hydrogels, and kerateine scaffolds loaded with rhBMP-2 achieved bridging in animals by 8 weeks as indicated by micro-computed tomography. Kerateine scaffolds achieved statistically increased bone mineral density compared to ACS and kerateine hydrogels, with levels reaching those of native bone. Importantly, both kerateine hydrogels and kerateine scaffolds had significantly less ectopic bone growth than ACS sponges at both 8 and 16 weeks post-operatively. These studies demonstrate the suitability of keratins as rhBMP-2 carriers due to equal regenerative capacity with reduced ectopic growth compared to ACS.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.12.087

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Keratin scaffolds lacking rhBMP-2 do not lead to bridging in this critically-sized rat femur defect model.

    “We confirmed previous studies showing that keratin scaffolds lacking rhBMP-2 do not lead to bridging in this critically-sized defected model.”

    From Keratin Scaffold Formulation Impacts rhBMP-2 Biodistribution and Bone Regeneration in a Rat Femur Defect Model (2025) · cites this paper as [20]

    Results §3.4 reports that kerateine scaffolds without rhBMP-2 did not heal the critically sized defect by 16 weeks. However, the studied defects were in rat mandibles, not femurs, so the source does not establish the claim for a femur model. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Formulations with more KOS or KTN with rhBMP-2 showed lower levels of callous outside of the defect site.

    “This is likely because formulations with more KOS or KTN with rhBMP-2 showed lower levels of callous outside of the defect site (Figs. 1 and 2), similar to previous observations with KTN in a mandible model [20].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 34 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kowalczewski, C. J., Tombyln, S., Wasnick, D. C., Hughes, M. R., Ellenburg, M. D., Callahan, M. F., Smith, T. L., Van Dyke, M. E., Burnett, L. R., & Saul, J. M.
Affiliations
  • Virginia Tech - Wake Forest University School of Biomedical Engineering & Sciences (US)
  • KeraNetics (United States) (US)
  • Miami University (US)
  • Wake Forest University Health Sciences (US)
Corresponding author
Saul, Justin M.
Venue
Biomaterials
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-03
Volume
35
Issue
10
Pages
3220-3228
ISSN
0142-9612 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1973282714
Cited by
58
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 7
FWCI
3.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Biomaterials (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • KeraNetics LLC
  • National Institutes of Health (R01AR061391)
  • US Army Medical Research and Materiel Command
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Silk-based biomaterials and applications
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Collagen: Extraction and Characterization
Keywords
rhBMP-2, absorbable collagen sponge, bone regeneration, mandibular defects, biomaterial carriers, bone mineral density
MeSH terms
Animals, Biocompatible Materials, Bone Development, Bone Regeneration, Keratins, Male, Mandible, Recombinant Proteins, Rheology, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Rats, Tissue Scaffolds, Bone Morphogenetic Protein 2

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review