The DOI matches its Crossref record.
PHENOTYPIC PLASTICITY OF HUMAN ARTICULAR CHONDROCYTES
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Progenitor cells in mesenchymal tissues are important in the maintenance of tissue homeostasis and regeneration capacity. Articular cartilage is a tissue with a very low capacity for repair. One explanation could be the lack of chondrogenic progenitor cells within the adult tissue. As a test of chondrogenic differentiation potential, we examined the ability of isolated chondrocytes to take on several phenotypic identities within the mesenchymal lineage by applying culture techniques and markers used in the study of the phenotypic plasticity of marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs). METHODS: Culture-expanded human articular chondrocytes were analyzed for chondrogenic, adipogenic, and osteogenic capacity in defined in vitro culture systems. The osteochondrogenic potential of cells loaded into porous calcium-phosphate ceramic cubes implanted into mice was also determined. RESULTS: The different assays demonstrated that culture-expanded chondrocytes have the potential to form cartilage in pellet mass cultures, to form adipose cells in dense monolayer cultures, and to form a calcium-rich matrix in an osteogenic assay. In the in vitro assays, a variability of phenotypic plasticity was demonstrated among the donors. In contrast with MSCs, chondrocytes formed cartilage only (and not bone) in the in vivo osteochondrogenic assay. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that, within articular cartilage, there are chondrogenic cells that exhibit a level of phenotypic plasticity that is comparable with that of MSCs. However, there was a difference in the expression of bone in the in vivo assay.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Adult mesenchymal stem cells for tissue engineering versus regenerative medicine
Caplan, A. I. (2007) · Journal of Cellular Physiology · doi:10.1002/jcp.21200 · Cited by 1,956
Self-citationMesenchymal Stem Cells: Time to Change the Name!
Caplan, A. I. (2017) · Stem Cells Translational Medicine · doi:10.1002/sctm.17-0051 · Cited by 1,119
Self-citationIn Search of the In Vivo Identity of Mesenchymal Stem Cells
da Silva Meirelles, L., Caplan, A. I., & Nardi, N. B. (2008) · Stem Cells · doi:10.1634/stemcells.2007-1122 · Cited by 1,077
Self-citationChung, C., & Burdick, J. A. (2008) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2007.08.027 · Cited by 760
NF-κB Signaling: Multiple Angles to Target OA
B. Marcu, K., Otero, M., Olivotto, E., Maria Borzi, R., & B. Goldring, M. (2010) · Current Drug Targets · doi:10.2174/138945010791011938 · Cited by 565
Metadata
- Authors
- TALLHEDEN, T., DENNIS, J. E., LENNON, D. P., SJÖGREN-JANSSON, E., CAPLAN, A. I., & LINDAHL, A.
- Venue
- The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-American Volume
- Published
- 2003
- Volume
- 85
- Pages
- 93-100
- ISSN
- 0021-9355 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W192836234
- Cited by
- 176
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: PHENOTYPIC PLASTICITY OF HUMAN ARTICULAR CHONDROCYTES. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2106/00004623-200300002-00012
- The paper
- TALLHEDEN, T., DENNIS, J. E., LENNON, D. P., SJÖGREN-JANSSON, E., CAPLAN, A. I., & LINDAHL, A. (2003). PHENOTYPIC PLASTICITY OF HUMAN ARTICULAR CHONDROCYTES. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-American Volume. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-200300002-00012
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.