Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,119

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 72 of the 72 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Mesenchymal Stem Cells: Time to Change the Name!

Open access
Caplan, Arnold I.·2017·Stem Cells Translational Medicine

Abstract

Summary: Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) were officially named more than 25 years ago to represent a class of cells from human and mammalian bone marrow and periosteum that could be isolated and expanded in culture while maintaining their in vitro capacity to be induced to form a variety of mesodermal phenotypes and tissues. The in vitro capacity to form bone, cartilage, fat, etc., became an assay for identifying this class of multipotent cells and around which several companies were formed in the 1990s to medically exploit the regenerative capabilities of MSCs. Today, there are hundreds of clinics and hundreds of clinical trials using human MSCs with very few, if any, focusing on the in vitro multipotential capacities of these cells. Unfortunately, the fact that MSCs are called “stem cells” is being used to infer that patients will receive direct medical benefit, because they imagine that these cells will differentiate into regenerating tissue-producing cells. Such a stem cell treatment will presumably cure the patient of their medically relevant difficulties ranging from osteoarthritic (bone-on-bone) knees to various neurological maladies including dementia. I now urge that we change the name of MSCs to Medicinal Signaling Cells to more accurately reflect the fact that these cells home in on sites of injury or disease and secrete bioactive factors that are immunomodulatory and trophic (regenerative) meaning that these cells make therapeutic drugs in situ that are medicinal. It is, indeed, the patient's own site-specific and tissue-specific resident stem cells that construct the new tissue as stimulated by the bioactive factors secreted by the exogenously supplied MSCs.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/sctm.17-0051

Cites

72 of 72 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 72 references

Research works printed but not linked: 15

  1. Caplan, 1990, Stem cell delivery vehicle, Biomaterials, 11, 44
  2. Caplan, 1973, Control of chondrogenic expression in mesodermal cells of embryonic chick limb, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 70, 1713, 10.1073/pnas.70.6.1713 · doi:10.1073/pnas.70.6.1713
  3. Caplan, 1983, The development of embryonic bone and cartilage in tissue culture, Clin Orthop Relat Res, 174, 243, 10.1097/00003086-198304000-00036 · doi:10.1097/00003086-198304000-00036
  4. Fell, 1925, The histogenesis of cartilage and bone in the long bones of the embryonic fowl, J Morphol, 40, 417, 10.1002/jmor.1050400302 · doi:10.1002/jmor.1050400302
  5. Solursh, 1986, Environmental regulation of type X collagen production by cultures of limb mesenchyme, mesectoderm, and sternal chondrocytes, Dev Biol, 117, 90, 10.1016/0012-1606(86)90351-9 · doi:10.1016/0012-1606(86)90351-9
  6. Caplan, 1984, Cartilage. Sci Am, 251, 84
  7. Carrino, 1982, Isolation and preliminary characterization of proteoglycans synthesized by skeletal muscle, J Biol Chem, 257, 14145, 10.1016/S0021-9258(19)45357-X · doi:10.1016/s0021-9258(19)45357-x
  8. Carrino, 1982, Proteoglycans produced by skeletal muscle in vitro and in vivo, Prog Clin Biol Res, 110, 379
  9. Urist, 1968, Inductive substrates for bone formation, Clin Orthop Relat Res, 59, 59, 10.1097/00003086-196807000-00005 · doi:10.1097/00003086-196807000-00005
  10. Syftestad, 1984, A fraction from extracts of demineralized adult bone stimulates the conversion of mesenchymal cells into chondrocytes, Dev Biol, 104, 348, 10.1016/0012-1606(84)90090-3 · doi:10.1016/0012-1606(84)90090-3
  11. Syftestad, 1985, The in vitro chondrogenic response of limb-bud mesenchyme to a water-soluble fraction prepared from demineralized bone matrix, Differentiation, 29, 230, 10.1111/j.1432-0436.1985.tb00321.x · doi:10.1111/j.1432-0436.1985.tb00321.x
  12. Osdoby, 1976, The possible differentiation of osteogenic elements in vitro from chick limb mesodermal cells. I. Morphological evidence, Dev Biol, 52, 283, 10.1016/0012-1606(76)90246-3 · doi:10.1016/0012-1606(76)90246-3
  13. Kay, 1979, Lexemic change and semantic shift in disease names, Cult Med Psychiatry, 3, 73, 10.1007/BF00114693 · doi:10.1007/bf00114693
  14. Murugan, 2009, Embryonic stem cell research: A decade of debate from Bush to Obama, Yale J Biol Med, 82, 101
  15. Couzin, 2004, Renovating the heart, Science, 304, 192, 10.1126/science.304.5668.192 · doi:10.1126/science.304.5668.192

Cited by

See all 1,119

Metadata

Authors
Caplan, A. I.
Venue
Stem Cells Translational Medicine
Published
2017-04-28
Volume
6
Issue
6
Pages
1445-1451
ISSN
  • 2157-6564 (ISSN-L)
  • 2157-6580
OpenAlex
W2608209876
Cited by
1,119
References
72
FWCI
48.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Virginia and David Baldwin Fund

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mesenchymal Stem Cells: Time to Change the Name! https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/sctm.17-0051
The paper
Caplan, A. I. (2017). Mesenchymal Stem Cells: Time to Change the Name! Stem Cells Translational Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1002/sctm.17-0051

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.