The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Projections of Primary and Revision Hip and Knee Arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Over the past decade, there has been an increase in the number of revision total hip and knee arthroplasties performed in the United States. The purpose of this study was to formulate projections for the number of primary and revision total hip and knee arthroplasties that will be performed in the United States through 2030. METHODS: The Nationwide Inpatient Sample (1990 to 2003) was used in conjunction with United States Census Bureau data to quantify primary and revision arthroplasty rates as a function of age, gender, race and/or ethnicity, and census region. Projections were performed with use of Poisson regression on historical procedure rates in combination with population projections from 2005 to 2030. RESULTS: By 2030, the demand for primary total hip arthroplasties is estimated to grow by 174% to 572,000. The demand for primary total knee arthroplasties is projected to grow by 673% to 3.48 million procedures. The demand for hip revision procedures is projected to double by the year 2026, while the demand for knee revisions is expected to double by 2015. Although hip revisions are currently more frequently performed than knee revisions, the demand for knee revisions is expected to surpass the demand for hip revisions after 2007. Overall, total hip and total knee revisions are projected to grow by 137% and 601%, respectively, between 2005 and 2030. CONCLUSIONS: These large projected increases in demand for total hip and knee arthroplasties provide a quantitative basis for future policy decisions related to the numbers of orthopaedic surgeons needed to perform these procedures and the deployment of appropriate resources to serve this need.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Berríos-Torres, S. I., Umscheid, C. A., Bratzler, D. W., Leas, B., Stone, E. C., Kelz, R. R., Reinke, C. E., Morgan, S., Solomkin, J. S., Mazuski, J. E., et al. (2017) · JAMA Surgery · doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2017.0904 · Cited by 3,569
The epidemiology and impact of pain in osteoarthritis
Neogi, T. (2013) · Osteoarthritis and Cartilage · doi:10.1016/j.joca.2013.03.018 · Cited by 1,730
Beswick, A. D., Wylde, V., Gooberman-Hill, R., Blom, A., & Dieppe, P. (2012) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2011-000435 · Cited by 1,450
The individual and socioeconomic impact of osteoarthritis
Hunter, D. J., Schofield, D., & Callander, E. (2014) · Nature Reviews Rheumatology · doi:10.1038/nrrheum.2014.44 · Cited by 1,238
A Randomized, Controlled Trial of Total Knee Replacement
Skou, S. T., Roos, E. M., Laursen, M. B., Rathleff, M. S., Arendt-Nielsen, L., Simonsen, O., & Rasmussen, S. (2015) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1505467 · Cited by 816
Predictors of persistent pain after total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Lewis, G. N., Rice, D. A., McNair, P. J., & Kluger, M. (2015) · British Journal of Anaesthesia · doi:10.1093/bja/aeu441 · Cited by 587
Metal-Induced Artifacts in MRI
Hargreaves, B. A., Worters, P. W., Pauly, K. B., Pauly, J. M., Koch, K. M., & Gold, G. E. (2011) · American Journal of Roentgenology · doi:10.2214/ajr.11.7364 · Cited by 559
Trends and predictors of opioid use after total knee and total hip arthroplasty
Goesling, J., Moser, S. E., Zaidi, B., Hassett, A. L., Hilliard, P., Hallstrom, B., Clauw, D. J., & Brummett, C. M. (2016) · Pain · doi:10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000516 · Cited by 461
Obesity and Total Joint Arthroplasty
(2013) · The Journal of Arthroplasty · doi:10.1016/j.arth.2013.02.011 · Cited by 373
Doloff, J. C., Veiseh, O., Vegas, A. J., Tam, H. H., Farah, S., Ma, M., Li, J., Bader, A., Chiu, A., Sadraei, A., et al. (2017) · Nature Materials · doi:10.1038/nmat4866 · Cited by 283
Petersen, K. K., Arendt-Nielsen, L., Simonsen, O., Wilder-Smith, O., & Laursen, M. B. (2015) · Pain · doi:10.1016/j.pain.0000000000000022 · Cited by 269
Risk factors associated with surgical site infection in 30 491 primary total hip replacements
Namba, R. S., Inacio, M. C. S., & Paxton, E. W. (2012) · The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British volume · doi:10.1302/0301-620x.94b10.29184 · Cited by 240
Edwards, R. R., Haythornthwaite, J. A., Smith, M. T., Klick, B., & Katz, J. N. (2009) · Pain Research and Management · doi:10.1155/2009/273783 · Cited by 202
Effectiveness of Telemedical Applications in Postoperative Follow-Up After Total Joint Arthroplasty
Sharareh, B., & Schwarzkopf, R. (2014) · The Journal of Arthroplasty · doi:10.1016/j.arth.2013.09.019 · Cited by 180
Predictors for moderate to severe acute postoperative pain after total hip and knee replacement
Liu, S. S., Buvanendran, A., Rathmell, J. P., Sawhney, M., Bae, J. J., Moric, M., Perros, S., Pope, A. J., Poultsides, L., Valle, C. J. D., et al. (2012) · International Orthopaedics · doi:10.1007/s00264-012-1623-5 · Cited by 167
Timmers, T., Janssen, L., van der Weegen, W., Das, D., Marijnissen, W.-J., Hannink, G., van der Zwaard, B. C., Plat, A., Thomassen, B., Swen, J.-W., et al. (2019) · JMIR mHealth and uHealth · doi:10.2196/15323 · Cited by 162
Inflammation, ageing, and bone regeneration
Gibon, E., Lu, L. Y., Nathan, K., & Goodman, S. B. (2017) · Journal of Orthopaedic Translation · doi:10.1016/j.jot.2017.04.002 · Cited by 144
Preoperative and Postoperative Opiate Use by the Arthroplasty Patient
Zarling, B. J., Yokhana, S. S., Herzog, D. T., & Markel, D. C. (2016) · The Journal of Arthroplasty · doi:10.1016/j.arth.2016.03.061 · Cited by 123
Correia, F. D., Nogueira, A., Magalhães, I., Guimarães, J., Moreira, M., Barradas, I., Teixeira, L., Tulha, J., Seabra, R., Lains, J., et al. (2018) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-018-29668-0 · Cited by 110
D'Apuzzo, M. R., & Browne, J. A. (2012) · The Journal of Arthroplasty · doi:10.1016/j.arth.2012.03.025 · Cited by 95
Szeverenyi, C., Kekecs, Z., Johnson, A., Elkins, G., Csernatony, Z., & Varga, K. (2018) · The Journal of Pain · doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2018.05.006 · Cited by 87
Risk Factors for Total Hip Arthroplasty Aseptic Revision
Khatod, M., Cafri, G., Namba, R. S., Inacio, M. C. S., & Paxton, E. W. (2014) · The Journal of Arthroplasty · doi:10.1016/j.arth.2014.01.023 · Cited by 61
Dias Correia, F., Nogueira, A., Magalhães, I., Guimarães, J., Moreira, M., Barradas, I., Molinos, M., Teixeira, L., Pires, J., Seabra, R., et al. (2019) · JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies · doi:10.2196/14523 · Cited by 60
Fu, J., Ghali, B. W., Lozynsky, A. J., Oral, E., & Muratoglu, O. K. (2011) · Polymer · doi:10.1016/j.polymer.2011.01.017 · Cited by 40
Petersen, K. K.-S. (2023) · Scandinavian Journal of Pain · doi:10.1515/sjpain-2022-0082 · Cited by 22
Metadata
- Authors
- Kurtz, S., Ong, K., Lau, E., Mowat, F., & Halpern, M.
- Venue
- The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-American Volume
- Published
- 2007-04
- Volume
- 89
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 780-785
- ISSN
- 0021-9355 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2051239218
- Cited by
- 8,698
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 105.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
