Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 479

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

PORCINE SMALL INTESTINE SUBMUCOSA AUGMENTATION OF SURGICAL REPAIR OF CHRONIC TWO-TENDON ROTATOR CUFF TEARS: A RANDOMIZED, CONTROLLED TRIAL

IANNOTTI, JOSEPH P., CODSI, MICHAEL J., KWON, YOUNG W., DERWIN, KATHLEEN, CICCONE, JAMES, BREMS, JOHN J.·2006·The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-American Volume

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Evidence to justify the use of porcine small intestine submucosa to augment repairs of large and massive rotator cuff tears is based on favorable results found in studies of Achilles tendon and infraspinatus tendon repairs in canines. The purpose of this study was to determine the effectiveness of a small intestine submucosal patch to augment the repair of chronic two-tendon rotator cuff tears in humans. METHODS: Thirty shoulders with a chronic two-tendon rotator cuff tear that was completely repairable with open surgery were randomized to be treated with either augmentation with porcine small intestine mucosa or no augmentation. All patients completed a PENN shoulder-score questionnaire preoperatively and at the time of the latest follow-up (at an average of fourteen months). Magnetic resonance imaging showed that nine shoulders had a large tear and twenty-one had a massive tear. All patients underwent a magnetic resonance imaging scan with intra-articular gadolinium one year after the repair to assess the status of the rotator cuff. RESULTS: The rotator cuff healed in four of the fifteen shoulders in the augmentation group compared with nine of the fifteen in the control group (p = 0.11). The median postoperative PENN total score was 83 points in the augmentation group compared with 91 points in the control group (p = 0.07). Healing of the defects in both groups demonstrated a strong correlation with the patients' clinical scores. The median postoperative PENN total score was 96 points in the group with a healed repair and 81 points in the group with a failed repair (p = 0.007). The percentage change between the preoperative and postoperative patient satisfaction scores was 400% in the group with a healed repair, and 50% in the group with a failed repair (p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Augmentation of the surgical repair of large and massive chronic rotator cuff tears with porcine small intestine submucosa did not improve the rate of tendon-healing or the clinical outcome scores. On the basis of these data, we do not recommend using porcine small intestine submucosa to augment repairs of massive chronic rotator cuff tears done with the surgical and postoperative procedures described in this study.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2106/00004623-200606000-00010

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 479

Metadata

Authors
IANNOTTI, J. P., CODSI, M. J., KWON, Y. W., DERWIN, K., CICCONE, J., & BREMS, J. J.
Venue
The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-American Volume
Published
2006-06
Volume
88
Issue
6
Pages
1238-1244
ISSN
0021-9355 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2077553246
Cited by
479
References
0
FWCI
16.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: PORCINE SMALL INTESTINE SUBMUCOSA AUGMENTATION OF SURGICAL REPAIR OF CHRONIC TWO-TENDON ROTATOR CUFF TEARS: A RANDOMIZED, CONTROLLED TRIAL. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2106/00004623-200606000-00010
The paper
IANNOTTI, J. P., CODSI, M. J., KWON, Y. W., DERWIN, K., CICCONE, J., & BREMS, J. J. (2006). PORCINE SMALL INTESTINE SUBMUCOSA AUGMENTATION OF SURGICAL REPAIR OF CHRONIC TWO-TENDON ROTATOR CUFF TEARS: A RANDOMIZED, CONTROLLED TRIAL. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-American Volume. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-200606000-00010

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.