Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 469

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 189 of the 189 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Tendon and ligament regeneration and repair: Clinical relevance and developmental paradigm

Open access
Yang, Guang, Rothrauff, Benjamin B., Tuan, Rocky S.·2013·Birth Defects Research Part C: Embryo Today: Reviews

Abstract

As dense connective tissues connecting bone to muscle and bone to bone, respectively, tendon and ligament (T/L) arise from the somitic mesoderm, originating in a recently discovered somitic compartment, the syndetome. Inductive signals from the adjacent sclerotome and myotome upregulate expression of Scleraxis, a key transcription factor for tenogenic and ligamentogenic differentiation. Understanding T/L development is critical to establishing a knowledge base for improving the healing and repair of T/L injuries, a high‐burden disease due to the intrinsically poor natural healing response. Current treatment of the three most common tendon injuries—tearing of the rotator cuff of the shoulder, flexor tendon of the hand, and Achilles tendon—include mostly surgical repair and/or conservative approaches, including biophysical modalities such as rehabilitation and cryotherapy. Unfortunately, the fibrovascular scar formed during healing possesses inferior mechanical and biochemical properties, resulting in compromised tissue functionality. Regenerative approaches have sought to augment the injured tissue with cells, scaffolds, bioactive agents, and mechanical stimulation to improve the natural healing response. The key challenges in restoring full T/L function following injury include optimal combination of these biological agents as well as their delivery to the injury site. A greater understanding of the molecular mechanisms involved in T/L development and natural healing, coupled with the capability of producing complex biomaterials to deliver multiple biofactors with high spatiotemporal resolution and specificity, should lead to regenerative procedures that more closely recapitulate T/L morphogenesis, thereby offering future patients the prospect of T/L regeneration, as opposed to simple tissue repair. Text. Birth Defects Research (Part C) 99:203–222, 2013. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/bdrc.21041

Cites

189 of 189 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

2 retracted

Show all 189 references

Research works printed but not linked: 49

  1. 10.1002/jor.1100150215 · doi:10.1002/jor.1100150215
  2. 10.1016/S0736-0266(01)00159-0 · doi:10.1016/s0736-0266(01)00159-0
  3. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2010.06.002 · doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2010.06.002
  4. 10.1097/00006534-200210000-00011 · doi:10.1097/00006534-200210000-00011
  5. 10.1177/0363546512461596 · doi:10.1177/0363546512461596
  6. 10.2106/JBJS.E.01307 · doi:10.2106/jbjs.e.01307 · Paper page
  7. 10.5435/00124635-201002000-00003 · doi:10.5435/00124635-201002000-00003
  8. 10.1016/S0363-5023(05)80284-9 · doi:10.1016/s0363-5023(05)80284-9
  9. 10.2460/ajvr.73.1.162 · doi:10.2460/ajvr.73.1.162
  10. 10.1006/dbio.2002.0707 · doi:10.1006/dbio.2002.0707
  11. 10.1002/jor.20271 · doi:10.1002/jor.20271
  12. 10.1016/S0736-0266(02)00078-5 · doi:10.1016/s0736-0266(02)00078-5
  13. 10.1097/00006534-198905000-00018 · doi:10.1097/00006534-198905000-00018
  14. 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2011.01238.x · doi:10.1111/j.1526-4637.2011.01238.x
  15. 10.1115/1.2721075 · doi:10.1115/1.2721075
  16. 10.2174/1874325001206010028 · doi:10.2174/1874325001206010028
  17. 10.1177/1938640009355191 · doi:10.1177/1938640009355191
  18. 10.2106/JBJS.E.00524 · doi:10.2106/jbjs.e.00524 · Paper page
  19. 10.2106/JBJS.J.01829 · doi:10.2106/jbjs.j.01829
  20. 10.1089/ten.2006.12.369 · doi:10.1089/ten.2006.12.369
  21. 10.1302/0301-620X.94B1.28008 · doi:10.1302/0301-620x.94b1.28008
  22. 10.1186/ar3846 · doi:10.1186/ar3846
  23. 10.1016/j.jhsa.2009.12.044 · doi:10.1016/j.jhsa.2009.12.044
  24. 10.1016/S0363-5023(95)80169-3 · doi:10.1016/s0363-5023(95)80169-3
  25. 10.1136/bjsm.29.2.121 · doi:10.1136/bjsm.29.2.121
  26. 10.1002/dvdy.21547 · doi:10.1002/dvdy.21547
  27. 10.1089/ten.2006.12.775 · doi:10.1089/ten.2006.12.775
  28. 10.1097/JSA.0b013e3181a3d625 · doi:10.1097/jsa.0b013e3181a3d625
  29. 10.1007/s00167-012-1972-z · doi:10.1007/s00167-012-1972-z
  30. 10.3113/FAI.2011.0009 · doi:10.3113/fai.2011.0009
  31. 10.1002/jor.20581 · doi:10.1002/jor.20581
  32. 10.1016/S0736-0266(00)90018-4 · doi:10.1016/s0736-0266(00)90018-4
  33. 10.1007/BF00387577 · doi:10.1007/bf00387577
  34. 10.1002/jor.22108 · doi:10.1002/jor.22108
  35. 10.1089/ten.tea.2008.0335 · doi:10.1089/ten.tea.2008.0335
  36. Oh JH, 2011, Does a critical rotator cuff tear stage exist? A biomechanical study of rotator cuff tear progression in human cadaver shoulders, J Bone Joint Surg Am, 93, 2100, 10.2106/JBJS.J.00032 · doi:10.2106/jbjs.j.00032
  37. 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2002.tb03064.x · doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.2002.tb03064.x
  38. 10.1016/j.jse.2010.04.006 · doi:10.1016/j.jse.2010.04.006
  39. 10.1159/000341426 · doi:10.1159/000341426
  40. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.07.008 · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.07.008
  41. Scott A, 2011, Mechanical force modulates scleraxis expression in bioartificial tendons, J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact, 11, 124
  42. 10.1016/j.jhsa.2006.03.024 · doi:10.1016/j.jhsa.2006.03.024
  43. 10.1097/00005768-200112000-00002 · doi:10.1097/00005768-200112000-00002
  44. 10.1177/1753193411419439 · doi:10.1177/1753193411419439
  45. 10.1007/s10856-011-4537-7 · doi:10.1007/s10856-011-4537-7
  46. 10.1097/SAP.0b013e3182583e99 · doi:10.1097/sap.0b013e3182583e99
  47. 10.1016/j.jse.2007.04.003 · doi:10.1016/j.jse.2007.04.003
  48. 10.1080/00016470152846646 · doi:10.1080/00016470152846646
  49. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.05.058 · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.05.058

Cited by

See all 469

Metadata

Authors
Yang, G., Rothrauff, B. B., & Tuan, R. S.
Venue
Birth Defects Research Part C: Embryo Today: Reviews
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-09
Volume
99
Issue
3
Pages
203-222
ISSN
  • 1542-975X (ISSN-L)
  • 1542-9768
OpenAlex
W2120212876
Cited by
469
References
189
FWCI
14.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green
Funders
  • Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Department of Health ((SAP4100050913), NIH (T32-EB001026, 1R01 AR062947-01A1))
  • U.S. Department of Defense ((W81XWH-11-2-0143))

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Tendon and ligament regeneration and repair: Clinical relevance and developmental paradigm. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/bdrc.21041
The paper
Yang, G., Rothrauff, B. B., & Tuan, R. S. (2013). Tendon and ligament regeneration and repair: Clinical relevance and developmental paradigm. Birth Defects Research Part C: Embryo Today: Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdrc.21041

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.