Cited by 33Paleontology and Stratigraphy of FossilsPaleontology and Evolutionary BiologyEvolution and Paleontology Studies

EARLY MOLLUSCAN EVOLUTION: EVIDENCE FROM THE TRACE FOSSIL RECORD

SEILACHER, ADOLF, HAGADORN, JAMES W.·2010·PALAIOS

Abstract

Abstract Trace fossils extend the history of early molluscan evolution because they have a higher preservation potential in siliciclastic strata, where body fossils are rare or absent, and also because they better record the activities of soft-bodied animals. The earliest mollusks are recorded by fan-shaped scratch arrays associated with death masks of the Ediacaran animal Kimberella. Cambrian traces––Climactichnites, Musculopodus, Radulichnus––and fecal pellets record giant, but shell-less mollusks that intermittently left the water to graze the biofilms of intertidal sand flats. After the Cambrian, these traces become progressively restricted. Their subsequent disappearance results from closure of a taphonomic window, rather than from extinction of these animals or their grazing behavior. Other Paleozoic groups of shell-less mollusks may have responded to increasing predation pressures by becoming infaunal. Unlike surface trails, their backfilled burrows––Psammichnites, “Aulichnites-Olivellites,” Dictyodora––are commonly preserved. These burrows reflect the evolution of sophisticated search programs in shallow-marine as well as deep-sea environments, but none of them continues into the Mesozoic.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2110/palo.2009.p09-079r

Cites

68 of 68 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The development of the fan-shaped ridges in elongate forms and the considerable length of the scratches makes a radula origin unlikely.

    “Although direct comparison has been made to scratches from molluscan radulae, most explicitly by Seilacher & Hagadorn (2000), their development in elongate fan-shaped forms and the considerable length of the scratches makes this unlikely (Ivantsov, 2009; Gehling et al. , 2014).”

    From The origin of the animals and a 'Savannah' hypothesis for early bilaterian evolution (2017) · cites this paper as Seilacher & Hagadorn (2000)

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 72 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
SEILACHER, A., & HAGADORN, J. W.
Affiliations
  • Yale University (US)
  • Denver Museum of Nature and Science (US)
Venue
PALAIOS
Published
2010-09-01
Volume
25
Issue
9
Pages
565-575
ISSN
  • 0883-1351 (ISSN-L)
  • 1938-5323
OpenAlex
W2060263832
Cited by
33
References
72
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 3
FWCI
2.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Palaios (publishedVersion)
  • BioOne Complete (BioOne) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Paleontology and Evolutionary Biology
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Evolution and Paleontology Studies
Keywords
molluscan evolution, trace fossils, Ediacaran, fecal pellets, predation pressure, search behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review