The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
SALib: An open-source Python library for Sensitivity Analysis
Open accessAbstract
SALib contains Python implementations of commonly used global sensitivity analysis methods, including Sobol (Sobol’ 2001, Andrea Saltelli (2002), Andrea Saltelli et al. (2010)), Morris (Morris 1991 ...
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Global Sensitivity Analysis. The Primer
Saltelli, A., Ratto, M., Andres, T., Campolongo, F., Cariboni, J., Gatelli, D., Saisana, M., & Tarantola, S. (2007) · doi:10.1002/9780470725184 · Cited by 6,430
Global sensitivity indices for nonlinear mathematical models and their monte carlo estimates
Sobol′, I. M. (2001) · Mathematics and Computers in Simulation · doi:10.1016/s0378-4754(00)00270-6 · Cited by 6,389
Factorial Sampling Plans for Preliminary Computational Experiments
Morris, M. D. (1991) · Technometrics · doi:10.1080/00401706.1991.10484804 · Cited by 4,943
Saltelli, A., Annoni, P., Azzini, I., Campolongo, F., Ratto, M., & Tarantola, S. (2010) · Computer Physics Communications · doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2009.09.018 · Cited by 3,623
A Quantitative Model-Independent Method for Global Sensitivity Analysis of Model Output
Saltelli, A., Tarantola, S., & Chan, K. P.-S. (1999) · Technometrics · doi:10.1080/00401706.1999.10485594 · Cited by 2,275
Making best use of model evaluations to compute sensitivity indices
Saltelli, A. (2002) · Computer Physics Communications · doi:10.1016/s0010-4655(02)00280-1 · Cited by 2,228
An effective screening design for sensitivity analysis of large models
Campolongo, F., Cariboni, J., & Saltelli, A. (2007) · Environmental Modelling & Software · doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2006.10.004 · Cited by 2,011
Study of the sensitivity of coupled reaction systems to uncertainties in rate coefficients. I Theory
Cukier, R. I., Fortuin, C. M., Shuler, K. E., Petschek, A. G., & Schaibly, J. H. (1973) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.1680571 · Cited by 1,046
A new uncertainty importance measure
Borgonovo, E. (2007) · Reliability Engineering & System Safety · doi:10.1016/j.ress.2006.04.015 · Cited by 1,026
Wagner, H. M. (1995) · Operations Research · doi:10.1287/opre.43.6.948 · Cited by 932
Cited by
Toward SALib 2.0: Advancing the accessibility and interpretability of global sensitivity analyses
Iwanaga, T., Usher, W., & Herman, J. (2022) · Socio-Environmental Systems Modelling · doi:10.18174/sesmo.18155 · Cited by 367
Self-citationInterpretML: A Unified Framework for Machine Learning Interpretability
Nori, H., Jenkins, S., Koch, P., & Caruana, R. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1909.09223 · Cited by 322
Sensitivity analysis methods in the biomedical sciences
Qian, G., & Mahdi, A. (2020) · Mathematical Biosciences · doi:10.1016/j.mbs.2020.108306 · Cited by 169
Abdelbaky, M., Peeters, J. R., & Dewulf, W. (2021) · Waste Management · doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2021.02.032 · Cited by 147
Kodros, J. K., O’Dell, K., Samet, J. M., L’Orange, C., Pierce, J. R., & Volckens, J. (2021) · GeoHealth · doi:10.1029/2021gh000482 · Cited by 93
Metadata
- Authors
- Herman, J., & Usher, W.
- Venue
- The Journal of Open Source Software
- Publisher
- The Open Journal
- Published
- 2017-01-10
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 97
- ISSN
- 2475-9066 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2569457803
- Cited by
- 1,524
- References
- 12
- Type
- software paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: SALib: An open-source Python library for Sensitivity Analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.21105/joss.00097
- The paper
- Herman, J., & Usher, W. (2017). SALib: An open-source Python library for Sensitivity Analysis. The Journal of Open Source Software. https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.00097
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.