Cited by 147Extraction and Separation ProcessesElectric Vehicles and InfrastructureEnvironmental Impact and Sustainability

On the influence of second use, future battery technologies, and battery lifetime on the maximum recycled content of future electric vehicle batteries in Europe

Open access
Abdelbaky, Mohammad, Peeters, Jef R., Dewulf, Wim·2021·Waste Management

Abstract

The European Union is promoting the uptake of low emission vehicles to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from transportation. However, this transition will increase the demand for five important battery raw materials; i.e. lithium, nickel, cobalt, copper, and graphite. Therefore, a substance flow analysis and forecasting model are proposed to investigate the flow of these materials through the different lifecycle stages of electric vehicle batteries. The model forecasts that by 2040, the vehicle stock will be from 72 to 78 million vehicles, while the second use stock will be from 3 to 11 million batteries. In addition, the annual recycling waste stream in 2040 will grow to roughly 3 million batteries with a capacity of 125 GWh. Results indicate that this waste stream could cover between 10% and 300% of future raw materials demand for electric vehicles. The width of this range is dominated by uncertainties on the rapidly evolving material composition of automotive batteries and the possible commercialization of cobalt-free battery technologies. The remaining uncertainty is attributed to the battery lifetime in vehicle use and potential second use of retired batteries.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.wasman.2021.02.032

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Gattiglio, F., 2019. Panel Discussion I: The Batteries Directive Review. Lyon: 24th International Congress for Battery Recycling ICBR 2019.
  2. Mathai, A. M. & Haubold, H. J., 2018. Collection of random variables. In: Probability and Statistics A Course for Physicists and Engineers. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter, pp. 249-258.
  3. Melin, H. E., 2019. State-of-the-art in reuse and recycling of lithium-ion batteries-A research review, s.l.: The Swedish Energy Agency.
  4. Nan, C. et al., 2011. Solvothermal synthesis of lithium iron phosphate nanoplates. Journal of Materials Chemistry, 21(27), pp. 9994-9996.
  5. Sobol, I. M., 1990. On sensitivity estimation for nonlinear mathematical models. Matem. Mod., 2(1), pp. 112-118.
  6. Yang, S., Zavalij, P. Y. & Whittingham, M. S., 2001. Hydrothermal synthesis of lithium iron phosphate cathodes. Electrochemistry Communications, 3(9), pp. 505-508.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Abdelbaky, M., Peeters, J. R., & Dewulf, W.
Affiliations
KU Leuven (BE)
Corresponding author
Abdelbaky, Mohammad
Venue
Waste Management
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-04
Volume
125
Pages
1-9
ISSN
0956-053X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3135123285
Cited by
147
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 36 · 2024: 37 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 8
FWCI
9.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Waste Management (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Lirias (KU Leuven) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Horizon 2020
  • Horizon 2020 Framework Programme (814464)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Extraction and Separation Processes
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Environmental Impact and Sustainability
Keywords
electric vehicle batteries, battery recycling, recycled content, battery life, battery raw materials, lithium, nickel, cobalt, copper, graphite, material demand forecasting, vehicle stock, substance flow analysis, European Union, low-emission vehicles
MeSH terms
Electricity, Europe, Lithium, Electric Power Supplies, Recycling

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review