Cited by 47Child Abuse and TraumaPosttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research

DEVELOPMENTAL TRAUMA AND NEUROCOGNITION IN YOUNG ADULTS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW

Gkintoni, Evgenia, Boutsinas, Basilis, Kourkoutas, Elias·2022·EDULEARN Proceedings

Abstract

Appears in: EDULEARN22 Proceedings Publication year: 2022Pages: 5656-5662ISBN: 978-84-09-42484-9ISSN: 2340-1117doi: 10.21125/edulearn.2022.1332Conference name: 14th International Conference on Education and New Learning TechnologiesDates: 4-6 July, 2022Location: Palma, Spain

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.21125/edulearn.2022.1332

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gkintoni, E., Boutsinas, B., & Kourkoutas, E.
Venue
EDULEARN Proceedings
Publisher
IATED
Published
2022-07
Volume
1
Pages
5656-5662
ISSN
2340-1117 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4285807537
Cited by
47
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 2
FWCI
105.55
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
EDULEARN proceedings (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
Keywords
developmental trauma, neurocognitive function, young adults, childhood adversity, cognitive function

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review