PreprintCited by 2Indigenous Health, Education, and RightsAutism Spectrum Disorder ResearchDown syndrome and intellectual disability research

Indigenous Autism in Canada: A Scoping Review

Open access
Bruno, Grant, Chan, Titus A, Zwaigenbaum, Lonnie, Nicholas, David, Coombs, Emily·2023·Research Square

Preprint — published as 10.1007/s10803-023-06045-z · Paper page

Abstract

Purpose: Currently there is a severe lack of research on autism and Indigenous people in Canada. This scoping review explores explore this literature gap and assesses the same literature from an Indigenous perspective. Methods: Scoping reviews are an effective means to explore the literature in a specific area, in this case, autism and Indigenous people in Canada. We explored existing literature as it pertains to Indigenous populations and autism in Canada. To support this review, the Indigenous Quality Assessment Tool (QAT) was adapted to appraise the quality of literature. Results: In total, there were a total of 212 articles identified of which 24 met the inclusion criteria: (1) some focus on autism, (2) a component specific to Indigenous people, and (3) specific to Canada. Of the 24 articles and reports, 15 were peer-reviewed and the rest considered grey literature. Most articles focused on program delivery with some literature using primary data (quantitative and/or qualitative). Overall, the quality of the research was appraised as poor, as determined by the QAT. Conclusion: Findings reaffirm the critical need for research that addresses autism in Indigenous communities within Canada and show the importance of having research done in full partnership with, or led by, Indigenous people.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.21203/rs.3.rs-2661859/v1

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A scoping review protocol was developed and registered with Open Science Framework.

    “A scoping review protocol was developed and registered with Open Science Framework. The protocol is titled, “Indigenous Autism in Canada: A Scoping Review” (Bruno, 2022).”

    From Indigenous Autism in Canada: A Scoping Review (2024) · cites this paper as Bruno, 2022

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Stavropoulou-Kampoukou. (2019). Culturally safe service delivery approaches for Indigenous children with autism spectrum disorder: A literature review. Unpublished.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bruno, G., Chan, T. A., Zwaigenbaum, L., Nicholas, D., & Coombs, E.
Affiliations
  • University of Alberta (CA)
  • University of Calgary (CA)
Corresponding author
Bruno, Grant
Venue
Research Square
Published
2023-03-21
OpenAlex
W4328054982
Cited by
2
References
24
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 1
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Research Square (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Children's Health Research Institute
  • Fondation Brain Canada
  • Stollery Children’s Hospital Foundation
  • Children's Hospital Foundation
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Down syndrome and intellectual disability research
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, indigenous peoples, Canada, Indigenous perspectives, research quality, research collaboration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review