Cited by 55Indigenous Peoples' Rights and LawDiscrimination and Equality LawMulticultural Socio-Legal Studies

The Complainant: The Canadian Human Rights Case on First Nations Child Welfare

Open access
Blackstock, Cindy·2017·McGill Law Journal

Abstract

In February 2007, the First Nations Child and Family Caring Society of Canada and the Assembly of First Nations filed a complaint under the Canadian Human Rights Act alleging that the Government of Canada’s inequitable provision of child welfare services to 163,000 First Nations children, along with its flawed implementation of Jordan’s Principle, was discriminatory on the prohibited grounds of race and national ethnic origin. The case was highly contested. By the time the final arguments were heard in 2014, the Government of Canada had made eight unsuccessful attempts to get the case dismissed on technical grounds and breached the law on three occasions. On 26 January 2016, the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal substantiated the complaint and ordered the Canadian Government to cease its discriminatory conduct. This article describes this historic case from the perspective of the executive director of the complainant, the First Nations Child and Family Caring Society of Canada, highlighting access to justice issues for equality-seeking Indigenous groups, children, and civil society. Recommendations for reform are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7202/1040049ar

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Canada has a history of human rights abuses against Indigenous children including children with disabilities.

    “Finally, Canada has a history of human rights abuses against Indigenous children including children with disabilities.”

    From Indigenous Autism in Canada: A Scoping Review (2024) · cites this paper as Blackstock, 2016

  • In 2016, the Human Rights Tribunal agreed that Canada was discriminating based on race, yet until recently the federal government ignored and failed to comply with this ruling.

    “In 2016, the Human Rights Tribunal agreed that Canada was indeed discriminating based on race, yet until recently the federal government of ignored and failed to comply with this ruling.”

    From Indigenous Autism in Canada: A Scoping Review (2024) · cites this paper as Blackstock, 2016

  • The FNCFCS and AFN successfully argued the crown discriminated against First Nations children in a flawed child welfare system, which includes disability services and supports.

    “The FNCFCS and AFN successfully argued the crown discriminated against First Nations children in a flawed child welfare system, which includes disability services and supports.”

    From Indigenous Autism in Canada: A Scoping Review (2024) · cites this paper as Blackstock, 2016

  • In 2007 the First Nations Child and Family Caring Society and the Assembly of First Nations brought forward allegations that the federal government had discriminated against First Nations children under the Canadian Human Rights Act.

    “In 2007 the First Nations Child and Family Caring Society (FNCSFCS) of Canada and the Assembly of First Nations (AFN) brought forward allegations that the federal government had discriminated against First Nations children under the Canadian Human Rights Act (Blackstock, 2016).”

    From Indigenous Autism in Canada: A Scoping Review (2024) · cites this paper as Blackstock, 2016

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Blackstock, C.
Corresponding author
Blackstock, Cindy
Venue
McGill Law Journal
Published
2017-06-05
Volume
62
Issue
2
Pages
285-328
ISSN
  • 0024-9041 (ISSN-L)
  • 1920-6356
OpenAlex
W2660585010
Cited by
55
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2015: 1
FWCI
30.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • McGill Law Journal (publishedVersion)
  • Érudit (Université de Montréal) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Law › Indigenous Peoples' Rights and Law
  • Social Sciences › Law › Discrimination and Equality Law
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies
Keywords
Canadian Human Rights Act, Assembly of First Nations, access to justice, indigenous children, civil society, child welfare services, legal reform

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review