PreprintCited by 10Computational Drug Discovery MethodsProtein Structure and DynamicsEnzyme Structure and Function

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Classification of likely functional state for ligand binding sites identified from fragment screening

Open access

Preprint — published as 10.1038/s42003-024-05970-8 · Paper page

Abstract

Fragment screening data from 37 experiments, and 1,309 protein structures binding to 1,601 ligands were analysed. A new method to group ligands by binding sites was developed and sites clustered according to profiles of relative solvent accessibility. This identified 293 unique ligand binding sites, which are grouped into four clusters (C1-4). C1 presents larger, more buried, conserved, and missense-depleted sites, and is enriched in known functional sites. C4 comprises smaller highly accessible, more divergent, missense-enriched sites, and is depleted in functional sites. A site in C1 is 28 times more likely to be functional than a site in C4. 17 novel sites in 13 proteins are identified as likely to be functionally important with examples from human tenascin and 5-aminolevulinate synthase discussed in more detail. An artificial neural network, and a K-nearest neighbours model are presented to predict cluster labels for new ligand binding sites with an accuracy of 96% and 100%, respectively so allowing functional classification of sites for proteins not in this set. Our findings will be of interest to those studying protein-ligand interactions and developing new drugs or function modulators.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.21203/rs.3.rs-3185838/v1

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Metadata

Authors
Utgés, J. S., MacGowan, S. A., Ives, C. M., & Barton, G. J.
Affiliations
  • University of Dundee (GB)
  • National University of Ireland, Maynooth (IE)
Corresponding author
Barton, Geoffrey J.
Venue
Communications Biology
Published
2023-07-25
Volume
7
Issue
1
Pages
320-320
ISSN
2399-3642 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4392746709
Cited by
10
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2
FWCI
2.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Communications Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Research Square (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Discovery Research Portal (University of Dundee) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • University of Dundee
  • Wellcome Trust (218259/Z/19/Z, 101651/Z/13/Z)
  • UK Research and Innovation
  • Research Councils UK (BB/J019364/1, BB/R014752/1, BB/J01446X/1)
  • Directorate for Biological Sciences
  • Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/J01446X/1, BB/J019364/1, BB/R014752/1, BB/X018628/1, J01446X, BB/L020742/1)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Drug Discovery › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Structural Biology › Enzyme Structure and Function
Keywords
ligand binding sites, fragment screening, binding site clustering, missense mutations, protein-ligand interactions, tenascin, 5-aminolevulinate synthase, binding site prediction, drug discovery
MeSH terms
Binding Sites, Humans, Ligands, Proteins, Drug Discovery

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review