PreprintCited by 18vaccines and immunoinformatics approachesMachine Learning in BioinformaticsComputational Drug Discovery Methods

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Improving generalizability and data efficiency for MHC-I binding peptide predictions through structure-based geometric deep learning

Open access

Preprint — published as 10.1038/s42003-024-07292-1

Abstract

The interaction between peptides and major histocompatibility complex (MHC) molecules is pivotal for tissue transplantation, pathogen recognition and autoimmune disease treatments. Recent advances in cancer immunotherapies demand for more accurate computational prediction of MHC-bound peptides. We address the generalizability challenge of MHC-bound peptide predictions, revealing limitations in current sequence-based approaches. Our solution employs structure-based methods leveraging geometric deep learning (GDL), yielding up to 8% improvement in generalizability across unseen MHC alleles. We tackle data efficiency by introducing a self-supervised learning approach surpassing sequence-based methods, even without being trained on binding affinity data. Finally, we demonstrate the resilience of structure-based GDL methods to biases in binding data on an Hepatitis B virus vaccine design case study. This study highlights structure-based methods’ potential to enhance generalizability and data efficiency, with implications for data-intensive fields like T-cell receptor specificity predictions, paving the way for enhanced comprehension and manipulation of immune responses.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.21203/rs.3.rs-3924124/v1

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 1 references

Metadata

Authors
Xue, L., Marzella, D., Crocioni, G., Radusinović, T., Lepikhov, D., Severin, H., Bodor, D., Rademaker, D., Lin, C., Georgievska, S., Renaud, N., Kessler, A., Lopez-Tarifa, P., Buschow, S., & Bekkers, E.
Affiliations
  • Radboud University Medical Center (NL)
  • Netherlands eScience Center (NL)
  • University of Amsterdam (NL)
  • Erasmus MC (NL)
  • Netherlands eScience Center
Corresponding author
Xue, Li
Venue
Communications Biology
Published
2024-03-26
Volume
7
Issue
1
Pages
1661-1661
ISSN
2399-3642 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4405577048
Cited by
18
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 1
FWCI
2.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Communications Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Research Square (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Nvidia
  • Netherlands eScience Center (NLESC.OEC.2021.008)
  • Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (OCENW.XS23.2.130)
  • Radboud Universitair Medisch Centrum (Rv819.52706)
  • Stichting Kinderen Kankervrij
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › vaccines and immunoinformatics approaches
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Drug Discovery › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
Keywords
geometric deep learning, structure-based prediction, self-supervised learning, data efficiency, immunopeptidomics, hepatitis B vaccine, cancer immunotherapy
MeSH terms
Deep Learning, Humans, Major Histocompatibility Complex, Peptides, Protein Binding, Computational Biology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review