PreprintCited by 1Drug Transport and Resistance MechanismsComputational Drug Discovery MethodsProtein Interaction Studies and Fluorescence Analysis

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Elucidating the binding specificity of interactive compounds targeting ATP binding cassette subfamily G member 2 (ABCG2)

Open access

Preprint — published as 10.1007/s11030-024-11078-2 · Paper page

Abstract

The ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporter superfamily plays a pivotal role in cellular detoxification and drug efflux. ATP binding cassette subfamily G member 2 (ABCG2) referred to as the Breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP) has emerged as a key member involved in multidrug resistance displayed by cancer cells. Understanding the molecular basis of substrate and inhibitor recognition, and binding within the transmembrane domain of ABCG2 is crucial for the development of effective therapeutic strategies. Herein, utilizing state-of-the-art molecular docking algorithms and molecular dynamic (MD) simulations, substrates and inhibitors molecular binding with ABCG2 are defined, distinctly. We performed extensive virtual screening of Drugbank to identify the potential candidates, and MD simulations of docked complexes were carried out in POPC lipid bound membrane. Further, the binding affinities of compounds were estimated by free binding energy employing MM-GBSA. Docking results show three compounds, Docetaxel > Tariquidar > Tezacaftor having highest binding affinities (> 12.00 Kcal/mol) for ABCG2. Remarkably, MM-GBSA results suggest the most stable binding of Tariquidar with ABCG2 as compared to the other inhibitors. These results provide valuable insights into the key residues that may govern substrate/inhibitor recognition, shedding light on the molecular determinants influencing substrate specificity, transport kinetics and ABCG2-mediated drug efflux. Hence, Tariquidar could serve as a potential candidate for the design of highly efficient inhibitors targeting ABCG2 in breast cancer therapy.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.21203/rs.3.rs-4954223/v1

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 44

  1. Rees DC, Johnson E, Lewinson O (2009) ABC transporters: the power to change. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 10(3):218–227 · DOI
  2. Begicevic RR, Falasca M (2017) ABC Transporters in Cancer Stem Cells: Beyond Chemoresistance. Int J Mol Sci 18(11) · DOI
  3. Banerjee A, Pata J, Chaptal V, Boumendjel A, Falson P, Prasad R (2023) Structure, function, and inhibition of catalytically asymmetric ABC transporters: Lessons from the PDR subfamily. Drug Resist Updat 71:100992 · DOI
  4. Thomas C, Aller SG, Beis K, Carpenter EP, Chang G, Chen L, Dassa E, Dean M, Van Duong F, Ekiert D et al (2020) Structural and functional diversity calls for a new classification of ABC transporters. FEBS Lett 594(23):3767–3775 · DOI
  5. Natarajan K, Xie Y, Baer MR, Ross DD (2012) Role of breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP/ABCG2) in cancer drug resistance. Biochem Pharmacol 83(8):1084–1103 · DOI
  6. Vaidya FU, Sufiyan Chhipa A, Mishra V, Gupta VK, Rawat SG, Kumar A, Pathak C (2022) Molecular and cellular paradigms of multidrug resistance in cancer. Cancer Rep (Hoboken) 5(12):e1291 · DOI
  7. Taylor NMI, Manolaridis I, Jackson SM, Kowal J, Stahlberg H, Locher KP (2017) Structure of the human multidrug transporter ABCG2. Nature 546(7659):504–509 · DOI
  8. Yu Q, Ni D, Kowal J, Manolaridis I, Jackson SM, Stahlberg H, Locher KP (2021) Structures of ABCG2 under turnover conditions reveal a key step in the drug transport mechanism. Nat Commun 12(1):4376 · DOI
  9. Jackson SM, Manolaridis I, Kowal J, Zechner M, Taylor NMI, Bause M, Bauer S, Bartholomaeus R, Bernhardt G, Koenig B et al (2018) Structural basis of small-molecule inhibition of human multidrug transporter ABCG2. Nat Struct Mol Biol 25(4):333–340 · DOI
  10. Irobalieva RN, Manolaridis I, Jackson SM, Ni D, Pardon E, Stahlberg H, Steyaert J, Locher KP (2023) Structural Basis of the Allosteric Inhibition of Human ABCG2 by Nanobodies. J Mol Biol 435(19):168234 · DOI
  11. Kannan P, Telu S, Shukla S, Ambudkar SV, Pike VW, Halldin C, Gottesman MM, Innis RB, Hall MD (2011) The specific P-glycoprotein inhibitor Tariquidar is also a substrate and an inhibitor for breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP/ABCG2). ACS Chem Neurosci 2(2):82–89 · DOI
  12. Weidner LD, Zoghbi SS, Lu S, Shukla S, Ambudkar SV, Pike VW, Mulder J, Gottesman MM, Innis RB, Hall MD (2015) The Inhibitor Ko143 Is Not Specific for ABCG2. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 354(3):384–393 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Orlando BJ, Liao M (2020) ABCG2 transports anticancer drugs via a closed-to-open switch. Nat Commun 11(1):2264 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Paquet E, Viktor HL (2013) Macromolecular structure comparison and docking: an algorithmic review. Curr Pharm Des 19(12):2183–2193 · DOI
  15. Sastry GM, Adzhigirey M, Day T, Annabhimoju R, Sherman W (2013) Protein and ligand preparation: parameters, protocols, and influence on virtual screening enrichments. J Comput Aided Mol Des 27(3):221–234 · DOI
  16. Pettersen EF, Goddard TD, Huang CC, Couch GS, Greenblatt DM, Meng EC, Ferrin TE (2004) UCSF Chimera–a visualization system for exploratory research and analysis. J Comput Chem 25(13):1605–1612 · DOI
  17. Laskowski RA, Swindells MB (2011) LigPlot+: multiple ligand-protein interaction diagrams for drug discovery. J Chem Inf Model 51(10):2778–2786 · DOI
  18. Mikhailovskii O, Izmailov SA, Xue Y, Case DA, Skrynnikov NR (2023) X-ray Crystallography Module in MD Simulation Program Amber 2023. Refining the Models of Protein Crystals. J Chem Inf Model
  19. Case DA, Cheatham TE 3rd, Darden T, Gohlke H, Luo R, Merz KM Jr., Onufriev A, Simmerling C, Wang B, Woods RJ (2005) The Amber biomolecular simulation programs. J Comput Chem 26(16):1668–1688 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Singh R, Kumar A, Rane JS, Khan R, Tripathi G, Ajay AK, Prakash A, Ray S (2022) Arylcoumarin perturbs SARS-CoV-2 pathogenesis by targeting the S-protein/ACE2 interaction. Sci Rep 12(1):17038 · DOI
  21. Mishra CB, Pandey P, Sharma RD, Malik MZ, Mongre RK, Lynn AM, Prasad R, Jeon R, Prakash A (2021) Identifying the natural polyphenol catechin as a multi-targeted agent against SARS-CoV-2 for the plausible therapy of COVID-19: an integrated computational approach. Brief Bioinform 22(2):1346–1360 · DOI
  22. Khater S, Kumar P, Dasgupta N, Das G, Ray S, Prakash A (2021) Combining SARS-CoV-2 Proofreading Exonuclease and RNA-Dependent RNA Polymerase Inhibitors as a Strategy to Combat COVID-19: A High-Throughput in silico Screening. Front Microbiol 12:647693 · DOI
  23. Genheden S, Ryde U (2015) The MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA methods to estimate ligand-binding affinities. Expert Opin Drug Discov 10(5):449–461 · DOI
  24. Hughes JP, Rees S, Kalindjian SB, Philpott KL (2011) Principles of early drug discovery. Br J Pharmacol 162(6):1239–1249 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Anderson AC (2012) Structure-based functional design of drugs: from target to lead compound. Methods Mol Biol 823:359–366 · DOI
  26. Hospital A, Goñi JR, Orozco M, Gelpí JL (2015) Molecular dynamics simulations: advances and applications. Adv Appl Bioinform Chem 8:37–47
  27. Du Q, Jiang G, Li S, Liu Y, Huang Z (2018) Docetaxel increases the risk of severe infections in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis. Oncoscience 5(7–8):220–238 · DOI
  28. Ostwal V, Bose S, Sirohi B, Poladia B, Sahu A, Bhargava P, Doshi V, Dusane R, Nashikkar C, Shrikhande SV et al (2018) Docetaxel/Oxaliplatin/Capecitabine (TEX) triplet followed by continuation monotherapy in advanced gastric cancer. Indian J Cancer 55(1):88–93 · DOI
  29. Cree BA, Selmaj KW, Steinman L, Comi G, Bar-Or A, Arnold DL, Hartung HP, Montalbán X, Havrdová EK, Sheffield JK et al (2022) Long-term safety and efficacy of ozanimod in relapsing multiple sclerosis: Up to 5 years of follow-up in the DAYBREAK open-label extension trial. Mult Scler 28(12):1944–1962 · DOI
  30. Sands BE, Schreiber S, Blumenstein I, Chiorean MV, Ungaro RC, Rubin DT (2023) Clinician's Guide to Using Ozanimod for the Treatment of Ulcerative Colitis. J Crohns Colitis · DOI
  31. Baker D, Forte E, Pryce G, Kang AS, James LK, Giovannoni G, Schmierer K (2023) The impact of sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor modulators on COVID-19 and SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. Mult Scler Relat Disord 69:104425 · DOI
  32. Hoy SM (2017) Pitavastatin: A Review in Hypercholesterolemia. Am J Cardiovasc Drugs 17(2):157–168 · DOI
  33. Hirano M, Maeda K, Matsushima S, Nozaki Y, Kusuhara H, Sugiyama Y (2005) Involvement of BCRP (ABCG2) in the biliary excretion of pitavastatin. Mol Pharmacol 68(3):800–807 · DOI
  34. Ridley K, Condren M (2020) Elexacaftor-Tezacaftor-Ivacaftor: The First Triple-Combination Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance Regulator Modulating Therapy. J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther 25(3):192–197
  35. Kowal J, Ni D, Jackson SM, Manolaridis I, Stahlberg H, Locher KP (2021) Structural Basis of Drug Recognition by the Multidrug Transporter ABCG2. J Mol Biol 433(13):166980 · DOI
  36. Houghton PJ, Germain GS, Harwood FC, Schuetz JD, Stewart CF, Buchdunger E, Traxler P (2004) Imatinib mesylate is a potent inhibitor of the ABCG2 (BCRP) transporter and reverses resistance to topotecan and SN-38 in vitro. Cancer Res 64(7):2333–2337 · DOI
  37. Nakanishi T, Shiozawa K, Hassel BA, Ross DD (2006) Complex interaction of BCRP/ABCG2 and imatinib in BCR-ABL-expressing cells: BCRP-mediated resistance to imatinib is attenuated by imatinib-induced reduction of BCRP expression. Blood 108(2):678–684 · DOI
  38. Kufareva I, Abagyan R (2012) Methods of protein structure comparison. Methods Mol Biol 857:231–257 · DOI
  39. Liu X, Shi D, Zhou S, Liu H, Liu H, Yao X (2018) Molecular dynamics simulations and novel drug discovery. Expert Opin Drug Discov 13(1):23–37 · DOI
  40. Lobanov M, Bogatyreva NS, Galzitskaia OV (2008) [Radius of gyration is indicator of compactness of protein structure]. Mol Biol (Mosk) 42(4):701–706 · DOI
  41. Hollingsworth SA, Dror RO (2018) Molecular Dynamics Simulation for All. Neuron 99(6):1129–1143 · DOI
  42. Prakash A, Dixit G, Meena NK, Singh R, Vishwakarma P, Mishra S, Lynn AM (2018) Elucidation of stable intermediates in urea-induced unfolding pathway of human carbonic anhydrase IX. J Biomol Struct Dyn 36(9):2391–2406 · DOI
  43. Wade RC, Goodford PJ (1989) The role of hydrogen-bonds in drug binding. Prog Clin Biol Res 289:433–444
  44. Chen D, Oezguen N, Urvil P, Ferguson C, Dann SM, Savidge TC (2016) Regulation of protein-ligand binding affinity by hydrogen bond pairing. Sci Adv 2(3):e1501240 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Ray, P., Kumari, I., Prasad, R., Ray, S., Banerjee, A., & Prakash, A.
Affiliations
  • Jawaharlal Nehru University
  • Amity University (IN)
  • Amity University Gurugram (IN)
  • Mahatma Gandhi Central University (IN)
Corresponding author
  • Banerjee, Atanu
  • Prakash, Amresh
Venue
Molecular Diversity
Published
2024-09-23
Volume
29
Issue
6
Pages
5635-5648
ISSN
1381-1991 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4406219493
Cited by
1
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 1
FWCI
0.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Molecular Diversity (publishedVersion)
  • Research Square (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Drug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Drug Discovery › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Interaction Studies and Fluorescence Analysis
Keywords
ABCG2, ABC transporters, substrate specificity, inhibitor binding, multidrug resistance, drug efflux, tariquidar, imatinib, docetaxel, tezacaftor, ozanimod, pitavastatin, binding affinity, POPC bilayer, MM-GBSA binding free energy, virtual screening
MeSH terms
ATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily G, Member 2, Binding Sites, Humans, Neoplasm Proteins, Protein Binding, Molecular Dynamics Simulation, Molecular Docking Simulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review