The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Strategies of Qualitative Inquiry
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Thematic networks: an analytic tool for qualitative research
Attride-Stirling, J. (2001) · Qualitative Research · doi:10.1177/146879410100100307 · Cited by 5,506
Qualitative Data Analysis for Health Services Research: Developing Taxonomy, Themes, and Theory
Bradley, E. H., Curry, L. A., & Devers, K. J. (2007) · Health Services Research · doi:10.1111/j.1475-6773.2006.00684.x · Cited by 3,437
Organizational Change: A Review of Theory and Research in the 1990s
Armenakis, A. A., & Bedeian, A. G. (1999) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920639902500303 · Cited by 1,625
Horváth, D., & Szabó, R. Z. (2019) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2019.05.021 · Cited by 1,281
Conceptualization: On Theory and Theorizing Using Grounded Theory
Glaser, B. G. (2002) · International Journal of Qualitative Methods · doi:10.1177/160940690200100203 · Cited by 932
Metadata
- Authors
- Hood, A.
- Venue
- Canadian Journal of University Continuing Education
- Publisher
- University of Alberta Libraries
- Published
- 2010-01-02
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 2
- ISSN
- 0318-9090 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1538179437
- Cited by
- 3,615
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1018.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Strategies of Qualitative Inquiry. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.21225/d5001g
- The paper
- Hood, A. (2010). Strategies of Qualitative Inquiry. Canadian Journal of University Continuing Education. https://doi.org/10.21225/d5001g
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
