Cited by 1,625Organizational Change and LeadershipOrganizational Management and ChangeManagement and Organizational Studies

Organizational Change: A Review of Theory and Research in the 1990s

Armenakis, Achilles A., Bedeian, Arthur G.·1999·Journal of Management

Abstract

This review selectively examines the theoretical and empirical organizational change literature over the past nine years (1990–early 1998). Four research themes or issues common to all change efforts are discussed: (a) content issues, which largely focus on the substance of contemporary organizational changes; (b) contextual issues, which principally focus on forces or conditions existing in an organization’s external and internal environments; (c) process issues, which address actions undertaken during the enactment of an intended change, and (d) criterion issues, which deal with outcomes commonly assessed in organizational change efforts. Research dealing with monitoring affective and behavioral reactions to change is also reviewed. In closing, general observations and suggestions for future research are offered and it is concluded that the organizational change literature continues to be responsive to the dynamics of contemporary workplace demands.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/014920639902500303

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Readiness, vision clarity, and participative communication are significant predictors of employee acceptance.

    “As contemporary syntheses have highlighted, readiness, vision clarity, and participative communication are significant predictors of employee acceptance (Armenakis & Bedeian, 1999).”

    From Digital transformation: a comparative analysis of SME digital maturity models (2025) · cites this paper as Armenakis & Bedeian, 1999

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Armenakis, A. A., & Bedeian, A. G.
Affiliations
  • Auburn University (US)
  • Louisiana State University (US)
Venue
Journal of Management
Published
1999-06
Volume
25
Issue
3
Pages
293-315
ISSN
  • 0149-2063 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-1211
OpenAlex
W2085827460
Cited by
1,625
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 56 · 2025: 64 · 2024: 55 · 2023: 66 · 2022: 61 · 2021: 77 · 2020: 91 · 2019: 86 · 2018: 83 · 2017: 79 · 2016: 93 · 2015: 92 · 2014: 92 · 2013: 97 · 2012: 93
FWCI
12.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Management (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Organizational Change and Leadership
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Organizational Management and Change
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Management and Organizational Studies
Keywords
organizational change, theory of change, organizational context, change processes, change outcomes, job demands

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review