The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Part-of-Speech Tagging for Twitter: Annotation, Features, and Experiments
Abstract
We address the problem of part-of-speech tagging for English data from the popular microblogging service Twitter.We develop a tagset, annotate data, develop features, and report tagging results nearing 90% accuracy.The data and tools have been made available to the research community with the goal of enabling richer text analysis of Twitter and related social media data sets.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Building a Large Annotated Corpus of English: The Penn Treebank
Marcus, M. (1993) · doi:10.21236/ada273556 · Cited by 7,405
Predicting the future with social media
Asur, S., & Huberman, B. A. (2010) · 2010 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology · doi:10.1109/wi-iat.2010.63 · Cited by 2,081
Cited by
A survey on opinion mining and sentiment analysis: Tasks, approaches and applications
Ravi, K., & Ravi, V. (2015) · Knowledge-Based Systems · doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2015.06.015 · Cited by 1,306
Learning Sentiment-Specific Word Embedding for Twitter Sentiment Classification
Tang, D., Wei, F., Yang, N., Zhou, M., Liu, T., & Qin, B. (2014) · Proceedings of the 52nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · doi:10.3115/v1/p14-1146 · Cited by 1,181
Adaptive Recursive Neural Network for Target-dependent Twitter Sentiment Classification
Dong, L., Wei, F., Tan, C., Tang, D., Zhou, M., & Xu, K. (2014) · Proceedings of the 52nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 2: Short Papers) · doi:10.3115/v1/p14-2009 · Cited by 1,074
Semantic Sentiment Analysis of Twitter
Saif, H., He, Y., & Alani, H. (2012) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-35176-1_32 · Cited by 521
Baziotis, C., Pelekis, N., & Doulkeridis, C. (2017) · Proceedings of the 11th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (SemEval-2017) · doi:10.18653/v1/s17-2126 · Cited by 485
Metadata
- Authors
- Gimpel, K., Schneider, N., O'Connor, B., Das, D., Mills, D., Eisenstein, J., Heilman, M., Yogatama, D., Flanigan, J., & Smith, N. A.
- Publisher
- Defense Technical Information Center
- Published
- 2010-01-01
- OpenAlex
- W4233787372
- Cited by
- 491
- References
- 2
- Type
- report
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Part-of-Speech Tagging for Twitter: Annotation, Features, and Experiments. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.21236/ada547371
- The paper
- Gimpel, K., Schneider, N., O'Connor, B., Das, D., Mills, D., Eisenstein, J., Heilman, M., Yogatama, D., Flanigan, J., & Smith, N. A. (2010). Part-of-Speech Tagging for Twitter: Annotation, Features, and Experiments. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada547371
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
