Cited by 24International Student and Expatriate ChallengesGlobal and Cross-Cultural ManagementCompetency Development and Evaluation

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Theoretical and Practical Advances in the Assessment of Cross-Cultural Competence

Gabrenya, Jr, William K., Griffith, Richard L., Moukarzel, Rana G., Pomerance, Marne H., Reid, Patrice·2012

Abstract

Organizations engaged in international operations must navigate complex intercultural dynamics for successful performance, necessitating identification of individuals who are likely to succeed in these environments and training personnel in cross-cultural competence (3C). To do so, adequate competency models of 3C need to be developed and valid 3C assessment instruments must be identified or generated. The present chapter reviews issues and challenges in 3C model development and illustrates these problems in an analysis of the Defense Language Office's Framework for Cross-Cultural Competence. The comparative advantages of competency versus causal models of 3C are discussed and an integration of competency and causal models is suggested. An examination of 34 instruments that have been recommended in the 3C civilian and military literatures for assessing cross-cultural competencies and their antecedent factors showed that existing 3C measures suffer from poor construct validity and have not been empirically linked to important outcome variables. A measurement strategy that eschews self-report methods and broadly assesses KSAOs and behavioral competencies is advocated.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.21236/ada564931

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 33 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Gabrenya, Jr., William K., G., Richard L., M., Rana G., P., Marne H., R., & Patrice
Published
2012-01-01
OpenAlex
W230765913
Cited by
24
References
33
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2
Type
report
Language
en
Open access
closed
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Communication › International Student and Expatriate Challenges
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Business and International Management › Global and Cross-Cultural Management
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Competency Development and Evaluation
Keywords
intercultural competence, competency model, causal models, construct validity, intercultural dynamics, international operations, behavioral competencies, self-report limitations, military personnel

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review