The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Theoretical and Practical Advances in the Assessment of Cross-Cultural Competence
Abstract
Organizations engaged in international operations must navigate complex intercultural dynamics for successful performance, necessitating identification of individuals who are likely to succeed in these environments and training personnel in cross-cultural competence (3C). To do so, adequate competency models of 3C need to be developed and valid 3C assessment instruments must be identified or generated. The present chapter reviews issues and challenges in 3C model development and illustrates these problems in an analysis of the Defense Language Office's Framework for Cross-Cultural Competence. The comparative advantages of competency versus causal models of 3C are discussed and an integration of competency and causal models is suggested. An examination of 34 instruments that have been recommended in the 3C civilian and military literatures for assessing cross-cultural competencies and their antecedent factors showed that existing 3C measures suffer from poor construct validity and have not been empirically linked to important outcome variables. A measurement strategy that eschews self-report methods and broadly assesses KSAOs and behavioral competencies is advocated.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Results from Troy et al. (2010) suggest that it is a valid method (Gabrenya et al., 2012).”
From Assessing Intercultural Competence in Higher Education: Existing Research and Future Directions (2016) · cites this paper as Gabrenya et al., 2012
In the citing paper
“The inclusion of additional stimuli acknowledges the cognitive and emotional load present in cross-cultural interactions, which can be complex and challenging (Gabrenya et al., 2012).”
From Assessing Intercultural Competence in Higher Education: Existing Research and Future Directions (2016) · cites this paper as Gabrenya et al., 2012
Citations
Cites
Deardorff, D. K. (2006) · Journal of Studies in International Education · doi:10.1177/1028315306287002 · Cited by 3,489
Social Cognition: From Brains to Culture
Fiske, S. T., & Taylor, S. E. (2013) · SAGE Publications Ltd eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781529681451 · Cited by 1,743
Cultural intelligence: individual interactions across cultures
(2004) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.41-4760 · Cited by 1,709
The SAGE Handbook of Intercultural Competence
Deardorff, D. K. (2009) · Sage eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781071872987 · Cited by 1,266
Brackett, M. A., Rivers, S. E., Shiffman, S., Lerner, N., & Salovey, P. (2006) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.91.4.780 · Cited by 1,063
Handbook of cultural intelligence: theory, measurement, and applications
Ang, S., & Dyne, L. V. (2009) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.46-4542 · Cited by 750
The Great Eight Competencies: A Criterion-Centric Approach to Validation.
Bartram, D. (2005) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.90.6.1185 · Cited by 745
THE PRACTICE OF COMPETENCY MODELING
Schippmann, J. S., Ash, R. A., BATJTSTA, M., CARR, L., Eyde, L. D., Hesketh, B. L., KEHOE, J., Pearlman, K., Prien, E. P., & Sánchez, J. I. (2000) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2000.tb00220.x · Cited by 743
Research Methods: A Process of Inquiry
Graziano, A. M. (1989) · Cited by 721
Thomas, D. C., Elron, E., Stahl, G. K., Ekelund, B. Z., Ravlin, E. C., Cerdin, J., Poelmans, S., Brislin, R. W., Pekerti, A., Aycan, Z., et al. (2008) · International Journal of Cross Cultural Management · doi:10.1177/1470595808091787 · Cited by 567
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Assessing Intercultural Competence in Higher Education: Existing Research and Future Directions
Griffith, R. L., Wolfeld, L., Armon, B. K., Rios, J., & Liu, O. L. (2016) · ETS Research Report Series · doi:10.1002/ets2.12112 · Cited by 211
“Nontraditional behavioral skills tests (Gabrenya et al., 2012) represent another set of task types.”
BackgroundMethodBuilding social resilience in soldiers: A double dissociative randomized controlled study.
Cacioppo, J. T., Adler, A. B., Lester, P. B., McGurk, D., Thomas, J. L., Chen, H., & Cacioppo, S. (2015) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/pspi0000022 · Cited by 119
Klafehn, J. L., Li, C., & Chiu, C. (2013) · Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology · doi:10.1177/0022022113492893 · Cited by 55
Cultural intelligence of expatriate workers: a systematic review
Morin, G., & Talbot, D. (2021) · Management Review Quarterly · doi:10.1007/s11301-021-00245-6 · Cited by 31
Schnabel, D. B. L., Kelava, A., Seifert, L., & Kuhlbrodt, B. (2014) · Diagnostica · doi:10.1026/0012-1924/a000110 · Cited by 30
Metadata
- Authors
- Gabrenya, Jr., William K., G., Richard L., M., Rana G., P., Marne H., R., & Patrice
- Publisher
- Defense Technical Information Center
- Published
- 2012-01-01
- OpenAlex
- W230765913
- Cited by
- 24
- References
- 33
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2
- Type
- report
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Communication › International Student and Expatriate Challenges
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Business and International Management › Global and Cross-Cultural Management
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Competency Development and Evaluation
- Keywords
- intercultural competence, competency model, causal models, construct validity, intercultural dynamics, international operations, behavioral competencies, self-report limitations, military personnel
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
