The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A Rapid and Nondestructive Method to Determine Chlorophyll in Intact Leaves
Open accessAbstract
The important role that chlorophyll (CHL) plays in plants necessitates its estimation in various types of studies. Singh and Anantrao (6) realized the need for a reasonably simple, rapid, and accurate method of CHL determination capable of accommodating small quantities of leaf tissue and a large number of quantitative estimates in a short time, and thus, in 1937, they developed a photoconductive photometer for quantifying CHL in 80% methanol. Since then, CHL determination techniques have improved considerably, but complete extraction of CHL is laborious, slow, and inconvenient in some plant species (3). Conventional methods used for isolating and measuring chlorophyll in aqueous acetone or similar organic solvents are sometimes cumbersome and slow, and always destructive to leaf tissue (1, 4, 7). Furthermore, steps involved in sample preparation, pigment extraction, and dilution result in pigment loss and contribute to variability. Moran (5) developed an efficient method for extracting small quantities of CHL from intact cotyledons with N , N -dimethyl-formamide (DMF). Inskeep and Bloom (3) further improved this technique by using extinction coefficients of chlorophyll a and b extracted in DMF. Evans (2) extracted CHL in 80% acetone and adapted Amon's modification of the method of McKinney (5), who provided equations (μmol CHL/1 = 22.22 D645 + 9.057 D663) to evaluate the molar concentrations of total chlorophyll (CHL a and b ) in the tissue extracts. Nevertheless, these procedures are still time consuming since they require tissue extraction and spectrophotometric measurement. The objective of this investigation was to determine area concentrations of total chlorophyll (CHL a + b ) using a portable chlorophyll meter (SPAD-501) and to compare and correlate these data with area concentrations of total CHL obtained by conventional methods.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Uddling, J., Gelang-Alfredsson, J., Piikki, K., & Pleijel, H. (2007) · Photosynthesis Research · doi:10.1007/s11120-006-9077-5 · Cited by 885
Babar, M. A., Reynolds, M. P., van Ginkel, M., Klatt, A. R., Raun, W. R., & Stone, M. L. (2006) · Crop Science · doi:10.2135/cropsci2005.0211 · Cited by 275
In situ measurement of leaf chlorophyll concentration: analysis of the optical/absolute relationship
PARRY, C., BLONQUIST, J. M., & BUGBEE, B. (2014) · Plant, Cell & Environment · doi:10.1111/pce.12324 · Cited by 274
Metadata
- Authors
- Yadava, U. L.
- Venue
- HortScience
- Published
- 1986-12
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1449-1450
- ISSN
- 0018-5345 (ISSN-L)
- 2327-9834
- OpenAlex
- W4296535396
- Cited by
- 323
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Rapid and Nondestructive Method to Determine Chlorophyll in Intact Leaves. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.21273/hortsci.21.6.1449
- The paper
- Yadava, U. L. (1986). A Rapid and Nondestructive Method to Determine Chlorophyll in Intact Leaves. HortScience. https://doi.org/10.21273/hortsci.21.6.1449
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.