The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year; 25 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Visual Assessments of Biodegradable Mulch Deterioration Are Not Indicative of Changes in Mechanical Properties
Open accessAbstract
The functionality of biodegradable mulch can be evaluated in agricultural field settings by visually assessing mulch intactness over time (a measure of deterioration), but it is unclear if mulch deterioration is indicative of mulch degradation as measured by mechanical properties (like breaking force and elongation). This 3-year study (2010–12) examined mulch percent visual deterioration (PVD) during the summer growing season in open-field and high tunnel production systems, and compared these to mulch mechanical properties at mulch installation (12–30 May), midseason (22 July–9 Aug.), and season end (6–25 Oct.), to determine if the field-based measures reliably predict degradation as revealed by changes in mulch mechanical properties. Four different types of biodegradable mulches [two plastic film mulches marketed as biodegradable (BioAgri and BioTelo); one fully biodegradable paper mulch (WeedGuardPlus); and, one experimental spunbonded plastic mulch designed to biodegrade (SBPLA)] were evaluated against a standard nonbiodegradable polyethylene (PE) mulch where tomato ( Solanum lycopersicum L. cv. Celebrity) was planted as the model crop. Each year for the 3 years, PVD increased earlier for WeedGuardPlus than the other mulches in both the high tunnel and open field, and WeedGuardPlus had the greatest PVD in both high tunnels and the open field (6% and 48%, respectively). Mechanical strength of WeedGuardPlus also declined by the end of the season both in the high tunnel (up to 46% reduction) and in the open field (up to 81% reduction). PVD of BioAgri and BioTelo reached a maximum of 3% in the high tunnel and 28% in the open field by the end of the season. Mechanical strength of BioAgri and BioTelo did not change over the course of the season in either the open field or high tunnel, even though the ability of these mulches to elongate or stretch declined 89% in the open field and 82% in the high tunnel. SBPLA and PE mulches did not show a change in PVD or mechanical properties in either the high tunnel or the open field. Overall, PVD was three to six times greater by midseason in the open field than in the high tunnels. Although there were significant relationships between visual assessments and various mechanical properties for each mulch except SBPLA, the relationships differed for each mulch when evaluated separately and had coefficients of determination ( R 2 ) below 30%. Furthermore, PVD overestimated mechanical deterioration of BioAgri and BioTelo. Results of this study indicate that mulch visual assessments may reflect general trends in changes in certain mechanical properties of the mulch; however, visual assessment and mechanical properties provide different information on deterioration. Each should be used as needed, but not as a substitute for each other.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Both elongation and breaking force of biodegradable plastic mulches (BDMs) were generally lower (100% to 416% and 18% to 124%, respectively) in the current study than in Cowan et al. [18] and Zhang et al. [23].
“Although the BDMs in this study were made with the same feedstocks (PLA, PBAT, and starch) and by the same manufacturers as the BDMs used in Cowan et al. [18] and Zhang et al. [23], both the elongation and breaking force of BDMs were generally lower (100% to 416% and 18% to 124%, respectively) in the current study”
From Soil-Biodegradable Plastic Mulches Undergo Minimal in-Soil Degradation in a Perennial Raspberry System after 18 Months (2020) · cites this paper as [18]
The Materials and Methods and Table 1 (page not available in our copy) identify the mulches, manufacturers, and some feedstocks used by Cowan et al.; the Results report measurements of breaking force and elongation. The copy does not establish that the later study used the same manufacturers and all three stated feedstocks, or verify its claimed 100%–416% and 18%–124% differences. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredMechanical properties are indirect indicators of mulch degradation because the physical integrity of biodegradable plastic mulches (BDMs) will deteriorate during the biodegradation process.
“Mechanical properties are indirect indicators of mulch degradation, because the physical integrity of BDMs will deteriorate during the biodegradation process [15,18,22].”
From Soil-Biodegradable Plastic Mulches Undergo Minimal in-Soil Degradation in a Perennial Raspberry System after 18 Months (2020) · cites this paper as [18]
The Discussion treats mechanical properties as measures of mulch degradation and says they reflect the material’s inherent condition. But the paper distinguishes field disintegration from biodegradation after incorporation into soil; it does not establish that the measured loss of physical integrity occurred during biodegradation. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredPSE measurements are not a measure of degradation.
“Cowan et al. [18] demonstrated, however, that PSE measurements are not a measure of degradation.”
From Soil-Biodegradable Plastic Mulches Undergo Minimal in-Soil Degradation in a Perennial Raspberry System after 18 Months (2020) · cites this paper as [18]
Cowan et al. [18] and Zhang et al. [23] sampled mulch treatments five months after application, and mulches were in place only during the summer season.
“Cowan et al. [18] and Zhang et al. [23] sampled mulch treatments five months after application, and mulches were in place only during the summer season.”
From Soil-Biodegradable Plastic Mulches Undergo Minimal in-Soil Degradation in a Perennial Raspberry System after 18 Months (2020) · cites this paper as [18]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Small sample inference for fixed effects from restricted maximum likelihood
Kenward, M. G., & Roger, J. H. (1997) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2533558 · Cited by 4,552
Biodegradation of Agricultural Plastic Films: A Critical Review
Kyrikou, I., & Briassoulis, D. (2007) · Journal of Polymers and the Environment · doi:10.1007/s10924-007-0053-8 · Cited by 634
Moreno, M. M., & Moreno, A. (2008) · Scientia Horticulturae · doi:10.1016/j.scienta.2008.01.007 · Cited by 322
Aliphatic Polyesters: Abiotic and Biotic Degradation and Degradation Products
Hakkarainen, M. (2002) · Advances in polymer science · doi:10.1007/3-540-45734-8_4 · Cited by 309
An Overview on the Mechanical Behaviour of Biodegradable Agricultural Films
Briassoulis, D. (2003) · Journal of Polymers and the Environment · doi:10.1023/b:jooe.0000010052.86786.ef · Cited by 250
Assessment of aliphatic–aromatic copolyester biodegradable mulch films. Part I: Field study
Kijchavengkul, T., Auras, R. A., Rubino, M. I., Ngouajio, M., & Fernandez, R. T. (2008) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2007.10.074 · Cited by 217
Mechanical behaviour of biodegradable agricultural films under real field conditions
Briassoulis, D. (2006) · Polymer Degradation and Stability · doi:10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2005.09.016 · Cited by 211
Standardization and certification in the area of environmentally degradable plastics
Kržan, A., Hemjinda, S., Miertuš, S., Corti, A., & Chiellini, E. (2006) · Polymer Degradation and Stability · doi:10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2006.04.034 · Cited by 194
Biodegradable mulch films for strawberry production
Bilck, A. P., Grossmann, M. V. E., & Yamashita, F. (2010) · Polymer Testing · doi:10.1016/j.polymertesting.2010.02.007 · Cited by 163
Mugnozza, G. S., Schettini, E., Vox, G., Malinconico, M., Immirzi, B., & Pagliara, S. (2006) · Polymer Degradation and Stability · doi:10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2006.02.017 · Cited by 149
Briassoulis, D. (2007) · Polymer Degradation and Stability · doi:10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2007.01.024 · Cited by 134
Miles, C. A., Wallace, R., Wszelaki, A. L., Martin, J. T., Cowan, J. S., Walters, T., & Inglis, D. A. (2012) · HortScience · doi:10.21273/hortsci.47.9.1270 · Cited by 134
Self-citationSchonbeck, M. W., & Evanylo, G. K. (1998) · Journal of Sustainable Agriculture · doi:10.1300/j064v13n01_06 · Cited by 93
Hablot, E., Dharmalingam, S., Hayes, D. G., Wadsworth, L. C., Blazy, C., & Narayan, R. (2014) · Journal of Polymers and the Environment · doi:10.1007/s10924-014-0697-0 · Cited by 84
Ngouajio, M., Auras, R. A., Fernandez, R. T., Rubino, M. I., Counts, J. W., & Kijchavengkul, T. (2008) · HortTechnology · doi:10.21273/horttech.18.4.605 · Cited by 71
Schonbeck, M. W. (1999) · Journal of Sustainable Agriculture · doi:10.1300/j064v13n02_04 · Cited by 69
Soil Degradation of Polylactic Acid/Polyhydroxyalkanoate-Based Nonwoven Mulches
Dharmalingam, S., Hayes, D. G., Wadsworth, L. C., Dunlap, R. N., DeBruyn, J. M., Lee, J., & Wszelaki, A. L. (2015) · Journal of Polymers and the Environment · doi:10.1007/s10924-015-0716-9 · Cited by 68
Biodegradable Mulches from Renewable Resources
Shogren, R. L. (2000) · Journal of Sustainable Agriculture · doi:10.1300/j064v16n04_05 · Cited by 64
Field Evaluation of Watermelon Grown on Paper-Polymerized Vegetable Oil Mulches
Shogren, R. L., & Hochmuth, R. C. (2004) · HortScience · doi:10.21273/hortsci.39.7.1588 · Cited by 58
Olsen, J. K., & Gounder, R. K. (2001) · Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture · doi:10.1071/ea00077 · Cited by 57
Comparison of different mulch materials in a tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) crop
Moreno, M. M., Moreno, A., & Mancebo, I. (2009) · Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research · doi:10.5424/sjar/2009072-1500 · Cited by 56
BIODEGRADABLE MULCHING IN AN ORGANIC TOMATO PRODUCTION SYSTEM
Martin-Closas, L., Bach, M. A., & Pelacho, A. M. (2008) · Acta Horticulturae · doi:10.17660/actahortic.2008.767.28 · Cited by 40
Ngouajio, M., & Ernest, J. (2005) · HortScience · doi:10.21273/hortsci.40.1.94 · Cited by 32
WEED CONTROL WITH BIODEGRADABLE MULCH IN VEGETABLE CROPS
Minuto, G., Pisi, L., Tinivella, F., Bruzzone, C., Guerrini, S., Versari, M., Pini, S., & Capurro, M. (2008) · Acta Horticulturae · doi:10.17660/actahortic.2008.801.29 · Cited by 24
NEW BIODEGRADABLE MATERIALS FOR GREENHOUSE SOIL MULCHING
Cascone, G., D’Emilio, A., Buccellato, E., & Mazzarella, R. (2008) · Acta Horticulturae · doi:10.17660/actahortic.2008.801.28 · Cited by 6
Flagged first, then by citations
2 of the 27 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Agronomic Effects of Biodegradable Films on Crop and Field Environment
Martin-Closas, L., Costa, J., & Pelacho, A. M. (2017) · Green chemistry and sustainable technology · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-54130-2_4 · Cited by 85
Research progress on preparation and field application of paper mulch
Li, A., Zhang, J., Ren, S., Yong, Z., & Zhang, F. (2021) · Environmental Technology & Innovation · doi:10.1016/j.eti.2021.101949 · Cited by 30
Zhang, H., Flury, M., Miles, C., Liu, H., & DeVetter, L. (2020) · Horticulturae · doi:10.3390/horticulturae6030047 · Cited by 19
Self-citationAnunciado, M. B., Wadsworth, L. C., Ghimire, S., Miles, C. A., Moore, J. C., Wszelaki, A. L., & Hayes, D. G. (2021) · HortTechnology · doi:10.21273/horttech04922-21 · Cited by 19
Self-citationAlternative Mulches for Sustainable Greenhouse Tomato Production
Marín-Guirao, J. I., Martín-Expósito, E., García-García, M. D. C., & García, M. D. C. (2022) · Agronomy · doi:10.3390/agronomy12061333 · Cited by 17
Zhang, H., Miles, C., Ghimire, S., Benedict, C., Zasada, I., Liu, H., & DeVetter, L. (2020) · HortScience · doi:10.21273/hortsci14734-19 · Cited by 15
Self-citationWortman, S. E., Camacho, M. E., Vargas-Rojas, J. C., Kadoma, I., Wehrbein, C. D., & Proctor, C. A. (2025) · HortTechnology · doi:10.21273/horttech05569-24 · Cited by 1
Madrid, B., Zhang, H., Miles, C. A., Kraft, M. D., Griffin-LaHue, D., & DeVetter, L. W. (2022) · Agriculture · doi:10.3390/agriculture12060865
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Cowan, J. S., Saxton, A. M., Liu, H., Leonas, K. K., Inglis, D., & Miles, C. A.
- Affiliations
- North Carolina State University (US)
- Venue
- HortScience
- Published
- 2016-03
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 245-254
- ISSN
- 0018-5345 (ISSN-L)
- 2327-9834
- OpenAlex
- W2340354506
- Cited by
- 8
- References
- 27
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 0.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- HortScience (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Polymer-Based Agricultural Enhancements
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Irrigation Practices and Water Management
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Agricultural Engineering and Mechanization
- Keywords
- biodegradable mulch, mechanical properties, breaking strength, elongation, paper mulch, high tunnels, polyethylene mulch, tomato, plastic film mulching, weed control, crop yield and quality, greenhouse gas emissions, soil organic carbon
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review