Cited by 3Sensor Technology and Measurement SystemsAnalog and Mixed-Signal Circuit DesignAdvanced Electrical Measurement Techniques

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Dual Slope Direct Digital Converter for Bridge Connected Resistive Sensors

Open access
N, Ponnalagu R., George, Boby, V, Jagadeesh Kumar·2014·International Journal on Smart Sensing and Intelligent Systems

Abstract

A dual slope direct digital converter (DSDDC) suitable for resistive sensor elements already connected in a bridge form is presented. A conventional dual slope analog to digital converter (DS-ADC) is altered with an intentionally introduced instrumentation amplifier (INA) to realize the proposed DDC. The DSDDC accepts bridge connected resistive sensor elements as input and provides a digital output that is proportional to the quantity being sensed by the sensor elements. The results obtained from simulation of the proposed DSDDC indicate a worst case error in the output to be < ±0.03 %. Experimental results from a prototype unit, presented herein, demonstrate the practicality the scheme. Worst case error of the prototype unit was found to be < ±0.07 % with test conducted using standard decade resistance boxes emulating the sensor elements. The worst case error in the prototype was < ±0.05 % when tested with a load-cell made of four strain gauges.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.21307/ijssis-2019-070

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 10 · Cited by 3

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. E. O. Doebelin, Measurement Systems —Application and Design, 5th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2004.
  2. B. Maundy and S. J. G. Gift, “ Strain Gauge amplifier circuits,” IEEE Trans.Instrum. Meas. September 2013, vol. 62, no. 4,pp. 693-700. · DOI
  3. S. Gift and B. Maundy, “ New configurations for the measurement of small resistance chaneges,” IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. II Analog Digit.Signal Process.,vol. 53,no. 3pp. 178-82, Mar 2006. · DOI
  4. D. Stefanescu, “Strain gauges and Wheatstone bridges basic instrumentation and new applications for electrical measurement of non – electrical quatities,” in Proc. 8th Int. Multi-Conf. SSD,Mar. 2011, pp. 15. · DOI
  5. E. W. Owen, “An integrating analog – to digital converter for differential transducers,” IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas.,vol. IM-28, no. 3,pp. 216-220, Sep. 1979. · DOI
  6. Watanabe, Kenzo; Mochizuki, Kouji, “ A high resolution, linear resistance to frquency converter,” IEEE Trans.Instrum.Meas., vol. 45(3), 1996, pp. 761-764. · DOI
  7. S. Kaliyugavaradhan , “ A linear resistanc to time converter with high resolution,” IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas., vol. 49, #1, Feb. 2000, pp. 151-153. · DOI
  8. R. P. Areny and J. G. Webster, “Digital and intelligent sensors,” in Sensor and Signal Conditioning (2nd ed. ). Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Wiley, 2001, pp. 458–478.
  9. S. Yurish, “Universal smart sensor interface and signal conditioner,” in Proc. IEEE Sensors Conf., Atlanta, GA, USA, 2007, pp. 24–27. · DOI
  10. N. M. Mohan and V. J. Kumar, “Direct digital converter for a single, active element resistive sensor,” in Proc. IEEE I2MTC, Singapore, 2009, pp. 828–831. · DOI · Paper page
  11. N. M. Mohan, B. George and V. J. Kumar, “A novel dual slope resistance to digital converter,” IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas., vol. 59,no. 5,pp. 1013-1018, May 2010. · DOI · Paper page
  12. P. R. Nagarajan, B. George and V. J. Kumar, “ A direct digital converter for resistive sensor elements in bridge configuration,” in Proc. IEEE ICST, Wellington , Newzealand, 2013, pp. 516-519. · DOI

Metadata

Authors
N, P. R., George, B., & V, J. K.
Affiliations
  • Department of Electrical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Madras , Chennai 600036 , India
  • Indian Institute of Technology Madras (IN)
Venue
International Journal on Smart Sensing and Intelligent Systems
Published
2014-01-01
Volume
7
Issue
5
Pages
1-5
ISSN
1178-5608 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3005743890
Cited by
3
References
10
Citations by year
2021: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 1
FWCI
0.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal on Smart Sensing and Intelligent Systems (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Instrumentation › Sensor Technology and Measurement Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Analog and Mixed-Signal Circuit Design
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advanced Electrical Measurement Techniques
Keywords
instrumentation amplifier, analog-to-digital conversion, strain gauges, load cell, sensor signal conditioning, conversion error

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review