The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Simulating Yield Response of Quinoa to Water Availability with AquaCrop
Abstract
The modeling of yield response to water is expected to play an increasingly important role in the optimization of crop water productivity (WP) in agriculture. During 3 yr (2004–2007), field experiments were conducted to assess the crop response to water stress of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) in the Bolivian Altiplano (4000 masl) under different watering conditions (from rain fed, RF, to full irrigation, FI). Crop physiological measurements and comparisons between simulated and observed soil water content (SWC), canopy cover (CC), biomass production, and final seed yield of a selected number of fields were used to calibrate the AquaCrop model. Subsequently, the model was validated for different locations and varieties using data from other experimental fields and from farmers' fields. Additionally, a sensitivity analysis was performed for key input variables of the parameterized model. AquaCrop simulated well the decrease of the harvest index (HI) of quinoa in response to drought during early grain filling as observed in the field. Further‐on, the procedure for triggering early canopy senescence was deactivated in the model as observed in the field. Biomass WP (g m−2) decreased by 9% under fully irrigated conditions compared with RF and deficit irrigation (DI) conditions, most probably due to severe nutrient depletion. Satisfactory results were obtained for the simulation of total biomass and seed yield [validation regression R2 = 0.87 and 0.83, and Nash‐Sutcliff efficiency (EF) = 0.82 and 0.79, respectively]. Sensitivity analysis demonstrated the robustness of the AquaCrop model for simulation of quinoa growth and production, although further improvements of the model for soil nutrient depletion, pests, diseases, and frost are also possible.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The DSSAT cropping system model
Jones, J. W., Hoogenboom, G., Porter, C. H., Boote, K. J., Batchelor, W. D., Hunt, L. A., Wilkens, P. W., Singh, U., Gijsman, A. J., & Ritchie, J. T. (2003) · European Journal of Agronomy · doi:10.1016/s1161-0301(02)00107-7 · Cited by 4,465
Raes, D., Steduto, P., Hsiao, T. C., & Fereres, E. (2009) · Agronomy Journal · doi:10.2134/agronj2008.0140s · Cited by 1,053
Self-citation
Cited by
Steduto, P., Hsiao, T. C., Raes, D., & Fereres, E. (2009) · Agronomy Journal · doi:10.2134/agronj2008.0139s · Cited by 1,878
Self-citationRaes, D., Steduto, P., Hsiao, T. C., & Fereres, E. (2009) · Agronomy Journal · doi:10.2134/agronj2008.0140s · Cited by 1,053
Self-citationAquaCrop: FAO's crop water productivity and yield response model
Vanuytrecht, E., Raes, D., Steduto, P., Hsiao, T. C., Fereres, E., Heng, L. K., Garcia Vila, M., & Mejias Moreno, P. (2014) · Environmental Modelling & Software · doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2014.08.005 · Cited by 403
Self-citationIntroduction: Can Water Use Efficiency Be Modeled Well Enough to Impact Crop Management?
Evett, S. R., & Tolk, J. A. (2009) · Agronomy Journal · doi:10.2134/agronj2009.0038xs · Cited by 80
Metadata
- Authors
- Geerts, S., Raes, D., Garcia, M., Miranda, R., Cusicanqui, J. A., Taboada, C., Mendoza, J., Huanca, R., Mamani, A., Condori, O., Mamani, J., Morales, B., Osco, V., & Steduto, P.
- Venue
- Agronomy Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2009-05
- Volume
- 101
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 499-508
- ISSN
- 0002-1962 (ISSN-L)
- 1435-0645
- OpenAlex
- W2038493861
- Cited by
- 200
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 13.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Simulating Yield Response of Quinoa to Water Availability with AquaCrop. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2134/agronj2008.0137s
- The paper
- Geerts, S., Raes, D., Garcia, M., Miranda, R., Cusicanqui, J. A., Taboada, C., Mendoza, J., Huanca, R., Mamani, A., Condori, O., Mamani, J., Morales, B., Osco, V., & Steduto, P. (2009). Simulating Yield Response of Quinoa to Water Availability with AquaCrop. Agronomy Journal. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2008.0137s
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.