Cited by 12Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive PhysiologyPasture and Agricultural SystemsAgricultural Productivity and Crop Improvement

Nonstructural carbohydrate concentration during field wilting of PM- and AM-cut alfalfa

Morin, Chantale, Tremblay, Gaëtan F., Bélanger, Gilles, Bertrand, Annick, Castonguay, Yves, Drapeau, Raynald, Michaud, Réal, Berthiaume, Robert +1 more·2012·Agronomy Journal

Abstract

Alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) cut in the late afternoon has a greater nonstructural carbohydrate (NSC) concentration than AM‐cut alfalfa but this difference might not be maintained during wilting. We monitored NSC concentration of PM‐ and AM‐cut alfalfa during wilting in narrow and wide swaths. Field‐grown alfalfa was cut either at 1800 h (PM) on days without rain (Day 0) or at 0800 h (AM) the following morning (Day 1) in seven growth cycles over 3 yr. Samples taken during wilting were analyzed for NSC (soluble carbohydrates + starch). At cutting, PM‐cut alfalfa had consistently greater NSC concentration [+6 to 54 g kg−1 of dry matter (DM)] than AM‐cut alfalfa. The NSC concentration decreased during wilting at rates that depended on growth cycles (0.2–3.5 g kg−1 DM h−1 on Day 1) but this decline was similar for AM‐ and PM‐cut alfalfa. When cut alfalfa reached 350 g DM kg−1 fresh matter (FM) on Day 1, NSC concentration was greater for PM‐ than for AM‐cut alfalfa (average of 15 with a range of 4–37 g kg−1 DM) and greater for the wide than narrow swaths (average of 7 with a range of 1–11 g kg−1 DM). Photosynthesis continued for 3 h on the morning of AM cutting for both PM‐ and AM‐cut alfalfa until DM concentration reached approximately 350 g DM kg−1 FM. The combination of late PM‐cutting and wilting in wide swaths can be used to increase the NSC concentration of wilted alfalfa.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2134/agronj2011.0365

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Cutting alfalfa in the afternoon increased the content of simple carbohydrates before wilting by 17, 18, and 22% in spring, summer, and fall, respectively, compared with cutting in the morning.

    “Cutting alfalfa in the afternoon increased the content of simple carbohydrates before wilting by 17, 18, and 22% in spring, summer, and fall, respectively, compared with cutting the forage in the morning (Morin et al., 2012).”

    From Silage review: Factors affecting dry matter and quality losses in silages (2018) · cites this paper as Morin et al., 2012

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Morin, C., Tremblay, G. F., Bélanger, G., Bertrand, A., Castonguay, Y., Drapeau, R., Michaud, R., Berthiaume, R., & Allard, G.
Affiliations
  • Université Laval (CA)
  • Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada (CA)
Corresponding author
Tremblay, Gaëtan F.
Venue
Agronomy Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-05
Volume
104
Issue
3
Pages
649-660
ISSN
  • 0002-1962 (ISSN-L)
  • 1435-0645
OpenAlex
W1967367959
Cited by
12
References
36
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
3.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Agronomy Journal (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Forestry › Pasture and Agricultural Systems
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Agricultural Productivity and Crop Improvement
Keywords
alfalfa, non-structural carbohydrates, wilting, cutting time, swath width, soluble sugars, starch, photosynthesis, forage quality, dry matter content

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review