The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Soil Carbon Inventories under a Bioenergy Crop (Switchgrass): Measurement Limitations
Abstract
Approximately 5 yr after planting, coarse root (>2 mm) carbon (C) and soil organic C (SOC) inventories (0–40 cm deep) were compared under different types of plant cover at four switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.) production field trials in the southeastern USA. There was significantly (p ≤ 0.05) more coarse root C under switchgrass (Alamo variety) and forest cover than under tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea Schreb.), corn (Zea mays L.), or native pastures of mixed grasses. Inventories of SOC under switchgrass were not significantly greater than SOC inventories under other plant covers. At some locations the statistical power associated with ANOVA of SOC inventories was low, which raised questions about whether differences in SOC could be detected statistically. A minimum detectable difference (MDD) for SOC inventories was calculated. The MDD is the smallest detectable difference between treatment means once the variation, significance level, statistical power, and sample size are specified. The analysis indicated that a difference of ≈50 mg SOC/cm2 or 5 Mg SOC/ha, which is ≈10 to 15% of existing SOC, could be detected with reasonable sample sizes (n = 16) and good statistical power (1 − β = 0.90). The smallest difference in SOC inventories that can be detected, and only with exceedingly large sample sizes (n > 100), is ≈2 to 3% (≈10 mg SOC/cm2 or 1 Mg SOC/ha). These measurement limitations have implications for monitoring and verification of proposals to ameliorate increasing g…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“SOC is spatially variable, making it difficult to match treatments with controls (Ellert et al., 2000) and to detect change in SOC (Garten & Wullschleger, 1999) -a problem that increases the variability within our data set.”
From Changes in soil organic carbon under biofuel crops (2009) · cites this paper as Garten & Wullschleger, 1999
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
World crop residues production and implications of its use as a biofuel
Lal, R. (2005) · Environment International · doi:10.1016/j.envint.2004.09.005 · Cited by 1,004
The Biology and Agronomy of Switchgrass for Biofuels
Parrish, D. J., & Fike, J. H. (2005) · Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences · doi:10.1080/07352680500316433 · Cited by 828
Changes in soil organic carbon under biofuel crops
ANDERSON‐TEIXEIRA, K. J., DAVIS, S. C., MASTERS, M. D., & DELUCIA, E. H. (2009) · GCB Bioenergy · doi:10.1111/j.1757-1707.2008.01001.x · Cited by 391
High-Value Renewable Energy from Prairie Grasses
McLaughlin, S. B., de la Torre Ugarte, D. G., Garten, Lynd, L. R., Sanderson, M. A., Tolbert, V. R., & Wolf, D. D. (2002) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es010963d · Cited by 316
Energy crops and their implications on soil and environment
Blanco‐Canqui, H. (2010) · Agronomy Journal · doi:10.2134/agronj2009.0333 · Cited by 306
Metadata
- Authors
- Garten, C. T., & Wullschleger, S. D.
- Affiliations
- Oak Ridge National Laboratory (US)
- Corresponding author
- Garten, C. T.
- Venue
- Journal of Environmental Quality
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1999-07
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1359-1365
- ISSN
- 0047-2425 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-2537
- OpenAlex
- W2026892711
- Cited by
- 181
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 11
- FWCI
- 11.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Environmental Quality (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Oak Ridge National Laboratory
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Bioenergy crop production and management
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil erosion and sediment transport
- Keywords
- soil organic carbon, switchgrass, energy crops, minimum detectable difference, statistical power, sample size, carbon sequestration, tall fescue, maize, native grasses, forest cover
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review