Cited by 181Bioenergy crop production and managementSoil Carbon and Nitrogen DynamicsSoil erosion and sediment transport

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Soil Carbon Inventories under a Bioenergy Crop (Switchgrass): Measurement Limitations

Garten, C. T., Wullschleger, S. D.·1999·Journal of Environmental Quality

Abstract

Approximately 5 yr after planting, coarse root (>2 mm) carbon (C) and soil organic C (SOC) inventories (0–40 cm deep) were compared under different types of plant cover at four switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.) production field trials in the southeastern USA. There was significantly (p ≤ 0.05) more coarse root C under switchgrass (Alamo variety) and forest cover than under tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea Schreb.), corn (Zea mays L.), or native pastures of mixed grasses. Inventories of SOC under switchgrass were not significantly greater than SOC inventories under other plant covers. At some locations the statistical power associated with ANOVA of SOC inventories was low, which raised questions about whether differences in SOC could be detected statistically. A minimum detectable difference (MDD) for SOC inventories was calculated. The MDD is the smallest detectable difference between treatment means once the variation, significance level, statistical power, and sample size are specified. The analysis indicated that a difference of ≈50 mg SOC/cm2 or 5 Mg SOC/ha, which is ≈10 to 15% of existing SOC, could be detected with reasonable sample sizes (n = 16) and good statistical power (1 − β = 0.90). The smallest difference in SOC inventories that can be detected, and only with exceedingly large sample sizes (n > 100), is ≈2 to 3% (≈10 mg SOC/cm2 or 1 Mg SOC/ha). These measurement limitations have implications for monitoring and verification of proposals to ameliorate increasing g…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2134/jeq1999.00472425002800040041x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Garten, C. T., & Wullschleger, S. D.
Affiliations
Oak Ridge National Laboratory (US)
Corresponding author
Garten, C. T.
Venue
Journal of Environmental Quality
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1999-07
Volume
28
Issue
4
Pages
1359-1365
ISSN
  • 0047-2425 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-2537
OpenAlex
W2026892711
Cited by
181
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 11
FWCI
11.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Environmental Quality (publishedVersion)
Funders
Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Bioenergy crop production and management
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil erosion and sediment transport
Keywords
soil organic carbon, switchgrass, energy crops, minimum detectable difference, statistical power, sample size, carbon sequestration, tall fescue, maize, native grasses, forest cover

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review