Cited by 154Soil Carbon and Nitrogen DynamicsBioenergy crop production and managementSoil erosion and sediment transport

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Soil Carbon Dynamics beneath Switchgrass as Indicated by Stable Isotope Analysis

Garten, C. T., Wullschleger, S. D.·2000·Journal of Environmental Quality

Abstract

Surface (0–40 cm) soil organic carbon (SOC) dynamics were studied beneath four switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.) field trials in the southeastern United States. Soil organic carbon was partitioned into particulate organic matter (POM) and mineral‐associated organic matter (MOM). Most (75–90%) of the SOC at each study site was affiliated with MOM (<0.053 mm). Changes in stable carbon isotope ratios were used to derive carbon inputs to and losses from POM and MOM at each site. Inventories of existing SOC and new C 4‐derived SOC beneath switchgrass decreased with increasing soil depth. Approximately 5 yr after establishment, 19 to 31% of the existing SOC inventories beneath switchgrass had been derived from new C 4‐carbon inputs. Calculated turnover times of POM and MOM ranged from 2.4 to 4.3 yr and 26 to 40 yr, respectively. The turnover time of SOC in the POM fraction increased with decreasing mean annual temperature. A simple, two‐compartment model was parameterized to predict the potential for soil carbon sequestration under switchgrass. An example calculation with the model indicated a measurable and verifiable recovery of soil carbon (≈12% increase) on degraded lands through one decade of switchgrass production. The potential to sequester carbon through switchgrass cultivation will depend on initial soil carbon inventories, prevailing climate, soil type, and site management.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2134/jeq2000.00472425002900020036x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 154

Metadata

Authors
Garten, C. T., & Wullschleger, S. D.
Affiliations
Oak Ridge National Laboratory (US)
Corresponding author
Garten, C. T.
Venue
Journal of Environmental Quality
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2000-03
Volume
29
Issue
2
Pages
645-653
ISSN
  • 0047-2425 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-2537
OpenAlex
W2116496130
Cited by
154
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 10
FWCI
12.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Environmental Quality (publishedVersion)
Funders
McGill University
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Bioenergy crop production and management
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil erosion and sediment transport
Keywords
soil organic carbon dynamics, switchgrass, particulate organic matter, mineral-associated organic matter, stable carbon isotopes, carbon turnover time, soil carbon sequestration, two-compartment model, degraded land, mean annual temperature, soil depth

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review