The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Nitrate Loss in Subsurface Drainage as Affected by Nitrogen Fertilizer Rate
Abstract
The relationships between N fertilizer rate, yield, and NO 3 leaching need to be quantified to develop soil and crop management practices that are economically and environmentally sustainable. From 1996 through 1999, we measured yield and NO 3 loss from a subsurface drained field in central Iowa at three N fertilizer rates: a low (L) rate of 67 kg ha−1 in 1996 and 57 kg ha−1 in 1998, a medium (M) rate of 135 kg ha−1 in 1996 and 114 kg ha−1 in 1998, and a high (H) rate of 202 kg ha−1 in 1996 and 172 kg ha−1 in 1998. Corn (Zea mays L.) and soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] were grown in rotation with N fertilizer applied in the spring to corn only. For the L treatment, NO 3 concentrations in the drainage water exceeded the 10 mg N L−1 maximum contaminant level (MCL) established by the USEPA for drinking water only during the years that corn was grown. For the M and H treatments, NO 3 concentrations exceeded the MCL in all years, regardless of crop grown. For all years, the NO 3 mass loss in tile drainage water from the H treatment (48 kg N ha−1) was significantly greater than the mass losses from the M (35 kg N ha−1) and L (29 kg N ha−1) treatments, which were not significantly different. The economically optimum N fertilizer rate for corn was between 67 and 135 kg ha−1 in 1996 and 114 and 172 kg ha−1 in 1998, but the net N mass balance indicated that N was being mined from the soil at these N fertilizer levels and that the system would not be sustainable.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A framework for evaluating ecosystem services provided by cover crops in agroecosystems
Schipanski, M. E., Barbercheck, M., Douglas, M. R., Finney, D. M., Haider, K., Kaye, J. P., Kemanian, A. R., Mortensen, D. A., Ryan, M. R., Tooker, J., et al. (2014) · Agricultural Systems · doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2013.11.004 · Cited by 652
Berger, K., Verrelst, J., Féret, J.-B., Wang, Z., Wocher, M., Strathmann, M., Danner, M., Mauser, W., & Hank, T. (2020) · Remote Sensing of Environment · doi:10.1016/j.rse.2020.111758 · Cited by 429
Kladivko, E. J., Frankenberger, J. R., Jaynes, D. B., Meek, D. W., Jenkinson, B. J., & Fausey, N. R. (2004) · Journal of Environmental Quality · doi:10.2134/jeq2004.1803 · Cited by 288
Self-citationAnion exchange capacity of biochar
Lawrinenko, M., & Laird, D. A. (2015) · Green Chemistry · doi:10.1039/c5gc00828j · Cited by 219
Woli, K. P., David, M. B., Cooke, R. A., McIsaac, G. F., & Mitchell, C. A. (2010) · Ecological Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.ecoleng.2010.04.024 · Cited by 198
Metadata
- Authors
- Jaynes, D. B., Colvin, T. S., Karlen, D. L., Cambardella, C. A., & Meek, D. W.
- Venue
- Journal of Environmental Quality
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2001-01
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1305-1314
- ISSN
- 0047-2425 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-2537
- OpenAlex
- W1977238148
- Cited by
- 378
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Nitrate Loss in Subsurface Drainage as Affected by Nitrogen Fertilizer Rate. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2134/jeq2001.3041305x
- The paper
- Jaynes, D. B., Colvin, T. S., Karlen, D. L., Cambardella, C. A., & Meek, D. W. (2001). Nitrate Loss in Subsurface Drainage as Affected by Nitrogen Fertilizer Rate. Journal of Environmental Quality. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2001.3041305x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.