The DOI matches its Crossref record; 42 of the 42 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Soil Quality at a National Scale in New Zealand
Abstract
New Zealand is a signatory to international conventions on environmental performance, and soil quality information is needed for reporting both at a national and regional level. Soil quality was measured at 222 sites in five regions of New Zealand (12 soil orders and 9 land-use categories). Topsoil (0-100 mm) properties measured were total carbon and nitrogen, potentially mineralizable N, pH, Olsen P, cation exchange capacity, bulk density, total porosity, macroporosity, and total available and readily available water. Our objectives were to gauge the representativeness of the sample, determine the contribution from land use or soil order to variability, rationalize the data set, and identify concerns for long-term sustainable land use. Soil and land use combinations were both under- or overrepresented in the data set compared with national distribution. Soil order and land-use categories explained 55 to 76% of the variance in soil properties. Total C contents of pastures were comparable with indigenous forest soils, but pastures were less acidic and with higher N and P contents. Plantation forests had characteristics similar to indigenous forests on comparable soils. Cropland soils comprised <1% of the national land cover and generally had high inorganic fertility and low organic matter, with evidence of compaction. Seven characteristics (total C, total N, mineralizable N, pH, Olsen P, bulk density, and macroporosity) explained 87% of the total variability. The findings are being used by monitoring agencies to raise awareness about soil quality in the wider community, set land management guidelines, and develop policies.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“After this initial data reduction, simple or multiple correlation analysis can further decrease the number of indicators (Andrews and Carroll, 2001; Kosmas et al., 2014), sometimes followed by the use of expert judgement for choosing only one out of two or more highly correlated soil properties (Sparling and Schipper, 2002).”
From Soil quality – A critical review (2018) · cites this paper as Sparling and Schipper, 2002
Citations
Cites
Water Retention: Laboratory Methods
Klute, A. (1986) · Soil Science Society of America book series · doi:10.2136/sssabookser5.1.2ed.c26 · Cited by 2,361
Defining and Assessing Soil Quality
Doran, J. W., & Parkin, T. B. (1994) · SSSA Special Publications · doi:10.2136/sssaspecpub35.c1 · Cited by 2,176
The role of soil organic matter in maintaining soil quality in continuous cropping systems
Reeves, D. W. (1997) · Soil and Tillage Research · doi:10.1016/s0167-1987(97)00038-x · Cited by 1,268
Methods for chemical analysis of soils
Blakemore, L. C. ;. S. (1981) · doi:10.7931/dl1-sbsr-10a · Cited by 1,248
New Zealand Soil Classification
Parfitt, R. (1994) · Geoderma · doi:10.1016/0016-7061(94)90077-9 · Cited by 544
The role of organic matter in soil compactibility: A review of some practical aspects
Soane, B. D. (1990) · Soil and Tillage Research · doi:10.1016/0167-1987(90)90029-d · Cited by 511
Identification of Regional Soil Quality Factors and Indicators I. Central and Southern High Plains
Brejda, J. J., Moorman, T. B., Karlen, D. L., & Dao, T. H. (2000) · Soil Science Society of America Journal · doi:10.2136/sssaj2000.6462115x · Cited by 494
Biological nitrogen fixation in mixed legume/grass pastures
Ledgard, S. F., & Steele, K. W. (1992) · Plant and Soil · doi:10.1007/bf00011314 · Cited by 478
Soil Quality Assessment of Tillage Impacts in Illinois
Wander, M. M., & Bollero, G. A. (1999) · Soil Science Society of America Journal · doi:10.2136/sssaj1999.634961x · Cited by 434
Soil quality: Current concepts and applications
Karlen, D. L., Andrews, S. S., & Doran, J. W. (2001) · Advances in Agronomy · doi:10.1016/s0065-2113(01)74029-1 · Cited by 430
Reservations regarding the soil quality concept
Sojka, R. E., & Upchurch, D. R. (1999) · Soil Science Society of America Journal · doi:10.2136/sssaj1999.6351039x · Cited by 259
Contribution of organic matter and clay minerals to the cation exchange capacity of soils
Parfitt, R., Giltrap, D. J., & Whitton, J. S. (1995) · Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis · doi:10.1080/00103629509369376 · Cited by 219
Brejda, J. J., Karlen, D. L., Smith, J. L., & Allan, D. L. (2000) · Soil Science Society of America Journal · doi:10.2136/sssaj2000.6462125x · Cited by 203
How farmers assess soil health and quality
Romig, D. E., Garlynd, M. J., Harris, R. F., & McSweeney, K. (1995) · Journal of Soil and Water Conservation · doi:10.1080/00224561.1995.12456955 · Cited by 195
Tillage-induced changes to soil structure and organic carbon fractions in New Zealand soils
Shepherd, T. G., Saggar, S., Newman, R. H., Ross, C. W., & Dando, J. (2001) · Soil Research · doi:10.1071/sr00018 · Cited by 192
The state of New Zealand's environment, 1997
Taylor, R. (1997) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 177
Fertilisers and soils in New Zealand farming.
During, C. (1984) · Cited by 158
Performance of soil condition indicators across taxonomic groups and land uses
Schipper, L. A., & Sparling, G. P. (2000) · Soil Science Society of America Journal · doi:10.2136/sssaj2000.641300x · Cited by 144
Self-citationConservation Reserve Program effects on soil quality indicators
Karlen, D. L., Rosek, M. J., Gardner, J. C., Allan, D. L., Alms, M. J., Bezdicek, D. F., Flock, M., Huggins, D. R., Miller, B. S., & Staben, M. L. (1999) · Journal of Soil and Water Conservation · doi:10.1080/00224561.1999.12457260 · Cited by 126
Chapter 1 Concepts of soil quality and their significance
Carter, M. R., Gregorich, E. G., Anderson, D. W., Doran, J. W., Janzen, H. H., & Pierce, F. J. (1997) · Developments in psychiatry · doi:10.1016/s0166-2481(97)80028-1 · Cited by 119
Palmer, K. A. (2011) · ResearchSpace (University of Auckland) · Cited by 119
Soil and solution chemistry under pasture and radiata pine in New Zealand
Parfitt, R., Percival, H. J., Dahlgren, R. A., & Hill, L. F. (1997) · Plant and Soil · doi:10.1023/a:1004266000509 · Cited by 116
Carter, M. R., Gregorich, E. G., Angers, D. A., Beare, M., Sparling, G. P., Wardle, D. A., & Voroney, R. P. (1999) · Canadian Journal of Soil Science · doi:10.4141/s99-012 · Cited by 107
Self-citationIsbell, R. (1994) · Geoderma · doi:10.1016/0016-7061(94)90101-5 · Cited by 106
Haynes, R. J., & Tregurtha, R. (1999) · Biology and Fertility of Soils · doi:10.1007/s003740050491 · Cited by 101
Soils in the New Zealand Landscape -the living mantle
Molloy, L. (1988) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 101
Cropping Strategies for Efficient Use of Water and Nitrogen
Hargrove, W. L., American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, & Soil Science Society of America (1988) · ASA special publication · doi:10.2134/asaspecpub51 · Cited by 101
Drewry, J. J., & Paton, R. J. (2000) · New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research · doi:10.1080/00288233.2000.9513438 · Cited by 98
Pabin, J., Lipiec, J., Włodek, S., Biskupski, A., & Kaus, A. (1998) · Soil and Tillage Research · doi:10.1016/s0167-1987(98)00098-1 · Cited by 91
A survey of soil physical properties on sheep and dairy farms in southern New Zealand
Drewry, J. J., Littlejohn, R. P., & Paton, R. J. (2000) · New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research · doi:10.1080/00288233.2000.9513425 · Cited by 87
Effect of Soil Water Content Variation on the Least Limiting Water Range
da Silva, Á. P., & Kay, B. D. (1997) · Soil Science Society of America Journal · doi:10.2136/sssaj1997.03615995006100030024x · Cited by 82
A study of the effects of soil bulk density on root and shoot growth of different ryegrass lines
Houlbrooke, D. J., Thom, E. R., Chapman, R., & McLay, C. D. A. (1997) · New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research · doi:10.1080/00288233.1997.9513265 · Cited by 79
Reganold, J. P., & Palmer, A. (1995) · Journal of Soil and Water Conservation · doi:10.1080/00224561.1995.12456965 · Cited by 65
Singleton, P. L., Boyes, M. K., & Addison, B. (2000) · New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research · doi:10.1080/00288233.2000.9513453 · Cited by 59
A Landscape‐Scale Study of Soil Quality in Three Prairie Farming Systems
Boehm, M., & Anderson, D. W. (1997) · Soil Science Society of America Journal · doi:10.2136/sssaj1997.03615995006100040022x · Cited by 58
Drewry, J. J., Lowe, J. A. H., & Paton, R. J. (1999) · New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research · doi:10.1080/00288233.1999.9513399 · Cited by 56
Topsoil characteristics of three contrasting New Zealand soils under four long‐term land uses
Sparling, G. P., Shepherd, T. G., & Schipper, L. A. (2000) · New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research · doi:10.1080/00288233.2000.9513454 · Cited by 46
Self-citationA soil depth approach to soil quality assessment
Rhoton, F. E., & Lindbo, D. L. (1997) · Journal of Soil and Water Conservation · doi:10.1080/00224561.1997.12457129 · Cited by 38
Hart, P. B. S., Sparling, G. P., & Kings, J. A. (1986) · New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research · doi:10.1080/00288233.1986.10430463 · Cited by 35
Self-citationResistance to cropping pressure of two New Zealand soils with contrasting mineralogy
Sparling, G. P., Schipper, L. A., Hewitt, A. E., & Degens, B. P. (2000) · Soil Research · doi:10.1071/sr99065 · Cited by 28
Self-citationVegetation change and soil quality in central Otago tussock grasslands, New Zealand.
Gibson, R., Hewitt, A., Sparling, G. P., & Bosch, O. J. H. (2000) · The Rangeland Journal · doi:10.1071/rj0000190 · Cited by 18
Self-citationAssessment of the Condition of Agricultural Lands in Six Mid‐Atlantic States
Hellkamp, A. S., Bay, J. M., Campbell, C. L., Easterling, K. N., Fiscus, D. A., Hess, G. R., McQuaid, B. F., Munster, M. J., Olson, G. L., Peck, S. L., et al. (2000) · Journal of Environmental Quality · doi:10.2134/jeq2000.00472425002900030015x · Cited by 9
Research works printed but not linked: 9
- Claydon J.J., 1989, Div. of Land and Soil Sci. Tech. Record LH5
- Cornforth I.S., 1984, Agric. Res. and Advisory Serv. Div.
- Gradwell M.W., 1979, New Zealand Soil Bureau Sci. Rep. 10C
- Metson A.J., 1979, Methods for the determination of soil organic carbon: A review, and application to New Zealand soils, N.Z. J. Sci., 22, 205
- New Zealand Soil Bureau, 1968, Soils of New Zealand, 50
- Organisation for Economic Co‐Operation and Development, 1996, Environmental performance reviews: New Zealand
- Roberts A.H.C., 2001, The current state of dairying soils in New Zealand
- Systat, 1992, Systat for Windows: Statistics
- Taylor N.H., 1968, Soils of New Zealand. Part 1, 7
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Soil quality – A critical review
Bünemann, E. K., Bongiorno, G., Bai, Z., Creamer, R. E., De Deyn, G., de Goede, R., Fleskens, L., Geissen, V., Kuyper, T. W., Mäder, P., et al. (2018) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2018.01.030 · Cited by 2,960
The use of microorganisms in ecological soil classification and assessment concepts
Winding, A., Hund‐Rinke, K., & Rutgers, M. (2005) · Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety · doi:10.1016/j.ecoenv.2005.03.026 · Cited by 264
Preferential flow and transport in soil: progress and prognosis
Clothier, B., Green, S., & Deurer, M. (2007) · European Journal of Soil Science · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2389.2007.00991.x · Cited by 210
Biological measurements in a nationwide soil monitoring network
Rutgers, M., Schouten, A. J., Bloem, J., Van Eekeren, N., De Goede, R. G. M., Jagersop Akkerhuis, G. A. J. M., Van der Wal, A., Mulder, C., Brussaard, L., & Breure, A. M. (2009) · European Journal of Soil Science · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2389.2009.01163.x · Cited by 168
Vogeler, I., Rogasik, J., Funder, U., Panten, K., & Schnug, E. (2008) · Soil and Tillage Research · doi:10.1016/j.still.2008.10.004 · Cited by 141
Metadata
- Authors
- Sparling, G. P., & Schipper, L. A.
- Affiliations
- Manaaki Whenua – Landcare Research (NZ)
- Landcare Research Private Bag 3127 Hamilton New Zealand
- Corresponding author
- Sparling, G. P.
- ORCID
- Schipper, L. A.
- Venue
- Journal of Environmental Quality
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002-11
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1848-1857
- ISSN
- 0047-2425 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-2537
- OpenAlex
- W1992909850
- Cited by
- 121
- References
- 42
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 11.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Environmental Quality (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- New Zealand Ministry for the Environment Sustainable Management Fund (5089)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Management and Crop Yield
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Science and Environmental Management
- Keywords
- soil quality, soil properties, soil orders, land use, soil carbon, soil nitrogen, mineralizable nitrogen, soil pH, Olsen phosphorus, cation exchange capacity, bulk density, macroporosity, soil compaction, pasture soils, agricultural soils, soil fertility, environmental disclosure, sustainable land use, New Zealand
- MeSH terms
- Agriculture, Environment, Environmental Monitoring, New Zealand, Policy Making, Quality Control, Reference Values, Soil Pollutants, Trees
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review