Cited by 144Soil Carbon and Nitrogen DynamicsSoil Management and Crop YieldSoil Science and Environmental Management

Performance of soil condition indicators across taxonomic groups and land uses

Schipper, L. A., Sparling, G. P.·2000·Soil Science Society of America Journal

Abstract

Information on soil conditions in New Zealand is needed to assess soil quality at a national scale. We tested a standard set of 16 primary indicators at 29 sites (0–10 cm depth) across nine soil great groups with matched examples of indigenous forest, plantation forest, pastures, and crops. Soils under indigenous forest were acidic (pH 5.5–5.7), low in Olsen P (5–14 μg cm −3 ), with high microbial C (814–1228 μg cm −3 ), respiration (1.1–1.4 μg C cm −3 h −1 ), total C (31.8–52.9 mg cm −3 ), macroporosity (9.6–11.7% v/v), and total available water (29.2–31.5% v/v). Plantation forest soils had generally similar characteristics. Pasture soils were less acidic (pH 5.3–6.9) than forest soils, but with more available P (5.5–43.0 μg cm −3 ), higher total C (30.7–141.5 mg cm −3 ), total N (2.7–9.0 mg cm −3 ), and mineralizable N (68–175 μg cm −3 ). The physical condition was similar to forest soils. Cropped soil had low total C (20–34 mg cm −3 ), microbial C (160–956 μg cm −3 ), respiration (0.29–1.33 μg C cm −3 h −1 ), and total available water (6.7–30.1% v/v), but high pH (5.8–7.2), Olsen P (11.2–199 μg cm −3 ), and bulk density (0.96–1.3 g cm −3 ). Principal component analysis identified outlier sites and grouped land uses independently of soil great groups. Some indicators were less useful because of high variability (unsaturated hydraulic conductivity), correlation to other indicators (microbial C) or interpretation difficulties (respiration). Overall, the standardized approach provided useful information about soil conditions on a national scale.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2136/sssaj2000.641300x

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Subsequently, statistical data reduction by multivariate techniques such as principal component analysis, redundancy analysis and discriminant analysis, and multiple regression, became more common for selecting minimum datasets.

    “Subsequently, statistical data reduction by multivariate techniques such as principal component analysis (PCA), redundancy analysis (RDA) and discriminant analysis (e.g. Andrews and Carroll, 2001; Lima et al., 2013; Schipper and Sparling, 2000; Shukla et al., 2006), and multiple regression (Kosmas et al., 2014) became more common.”

    From Soil quality – A critical review (2018) · cites this paper as Schipper and Sparling, 2000

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 43 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schipper, L. A., & Sparling, G. P.
Affiliations
Landcare Research Private Bag 3127 Hamilton New Zealand
Corresponding author
Sparling, G. P.
Venue
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2000-01
Volume
64
Issue
1
Pages
300-311
ISSN
  • 0361-5995 (ISSN-L)
  • 1435-0661
OpenAlex
W2088708205
Cited by
144
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 4
FWCI
11.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Soil Science Society of America Journal (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • New Zealand Ministry for the Environment Sustainable Management Fund
  • Foundation for Research, Science, and Technology (C09629)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Management and Crop Yield
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Science and Environmental Management
Keywords
soil quality assessment, land use, pasture soils, agricultural soils, soil pH, Olsen phosphorus, microbial biomass carbon, soil respiration, soil organic carbon, soil nitrogen, macroporosity, available water capacity, unsaturated hydraulic conductivity, bulk density, New Zealand soils

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review