The DOI matches its Crossref record; 34 of the 34 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Salmonella Survival in Manure‐Treated Soils during Simulated Seasonal Temperature Exposure
Abstract
Addition of animal manure to soil can provide opportunity for Salmonella contamination of soil, water, and food. This study examined how exposure of hog manure‐treated loamy sand and clay soils to different simulated seasonal temperature sequences influenced the length of Salmonella survival. A six‐strain cocktail of Salmonella serovars (Agona, Hadar, Heidelberg, Montevideo, Oranienburg, and Typhimurium) was added to yield 5 log cfu/g directly to about 5 kg of the two soils and moisture adjusted to 60 or 80% of field capacity (FC). Similarly, the Salmonella cocktail was mixed with fresh manure slurry from a hog nursery barn and the latter added to the two soils at 25 g/kg to achieve 5 log cfu/g Salmonella Manure was mixed either throughout the soil or with the top kilogram of soil and the entire soil volume was adjusted to 60 or 80% FC. Soil treatments were stored 180 d at temperature sequences representing winter to summer (−18, 4, 10, 25°C), spring to summer (4, 10, 25, 30°C), or summer to winter (25, 10, 4, −18°C) seasonal periods with each temperature step lasting 45 d. Samples for Salmonella recovery by direct plating or enrichment were taken at 0, 7, and 15 d post‐inoculation and thereafter at 15‐d intervals to 180 d. Salmonella numbers decreased during application to soil and the largest decreases occurred within the first week. Higher soil moisture, manure addition, and storage in the clay soil increased Salmonella survival. Salmonella survived longest (≥180 d) in both soils during summer‐winter exposure but was not isolated after 160 d from loamy sand soil exposed to other seasonal treatments. For all but one treatment decimal reduction time (DRT 45d) values calculated from the first 45 d after application were ≤30 d and suggested that a 30‐d delay between field application of manure in the spring or fall and use of the land would provide reasonable assurance that crop and animal contamination by Salmonella would be minimized.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The reduction of faecal bacteria in the soil varies due to the temperature, pH, type and humidity of the soil, as well as the season and presence of an antagonistic microflora in relation to pathogens (You et al. 2006; Holley et al. 2006; Edrington et al. 2009).”
From Trends in designing microbial silage quality by biotechnological methods using lactic acid bacteria inoculants: a minireview. (2019) · cites this paper as Holley et al. 2006
In the citing paper
“The survival time of Salmonella spp. in the soil depends on the conditions and can last about 33 weeks or longer.”
From Trends in designing microbial silage quality by biotechnological methods using lactic acid bacteria inoculants: a minireview. (2019) · cites this paper as Holley et al. 2006
Citations
Cites
Soil sampling and methods of analysis
(1994) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.31-3799 · Cited by 3,629
Pathogen survival during livestock manure storage and following land application
Nicholson, F. A., Groves, S. J., & CHAMBERS, B. J. (2004) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2004.02.030 · Cited by 508
Fate of Escherichia coli O157:H7 in Manure-Amended Soil
Jiang, X., Morgan, J., & Doyle, M. P. (2002) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.68.5.2605-2609.2002 · Cited by 363
Gagliardi, J. V., & Karns, J. S. (2000) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.66.3.877-883.2000 · Cited by 325
Islam, M. U., Morgan, J., Doyle, M. P., Phatak, S. C., Millner, P. D., & Jiang, X. (2004) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.70.4.2497-2502.2004 · Cited by 302
Natvig, E. E., Ingham, S. C., Ingham, B. H., Cooperband, L. R., & Roper, T. R. (2002) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.68.6.2737-2744.2002 · Cited by 301
Pathogen Survival in Swine Manure Environments and Transmission of Human Enteric Illness—A Review
Guan, T. Y., & Holley, R. A. (2003) · Journal of Environmental Quality · doi:10.2134/jeq2003.3830 · Cited by 300
Self-citationAnalyses of Livestock Production, Waste Storage, and Pathogen Levels and Prevalences in Farm Manures
Hutchison, M. L., Walters, L. D., Avery, S. M., Munro, F., & Moore, A. (2005) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.71.3.1231-1236.2005 · Cited by 226
Survival of E. coli and Enterococcus spp. derived from pig slurry in soils of different texture
Cools, D., Merckx, R., Vlassak, K., & Verhaegen, J. (2001) · Applied Soil Ecology · doi:10.1016/s0929-1393(00)00133-5 · Cited by 193
Guo, X., Chen, J., Brackett, R. E., & Beuchat, L. R. (2002) · Journal of Food Protection · doi:10.4315/0362-028x-65.2.274 · Cited by 162
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- 10.2136/sssabookser5.1.2ed.c36 · DOI
- Jones P.W., 1986, Epidemiological studies of risks associated with the agricultural use of sewage sludge, 21
- SAS Institute, 1990, SAS user's guide: Statistics
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Factors influencing the microbial safety of fresh produce: A review
Olaimat, A. N., & Holley, R. A. (2012) · Food Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.fm.2012.04.016 · Cited by 908
Self-citationAlegbeleye, O. O., Singleton, I., & Sant’Ana, A. S. (2018) · Food Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.fm.2018.01.003 · Cited by 669
Strawn, L. K., Fortes, E. D., Bihn, E. A., Nightingale, K. K., Grohn, Y. T., Worobo, R. W., Wiedmann, M., & Bergholz, P. W. (2012) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.02491-12 · Cited by 276
Klerks, M. M., Franz, E., van Gent‐Pelzer, M. P. E., Zijlstra, C., & van Bruggen, A. H. C. (2007) · The ISME Journal · doi:10.1038/ismej.2007.82 · Cited by 240
Functional and Structural Succession of Soil Microbial Communities below Decomposing Human Cadavers
Cobaugh, K. L., Schaeffer, S. M., & DeBruyn, J. M. (2015) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0130201 · Cited by 204
Metadata
- Authors
- Holley, R. A., Arrus, K. M., Ominski, K. H., Tenuta, M., & Blank, G.
- Affiliations
- University of Manitoba (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Holley, Richard A.
- Venue
- Journal of Environmental Quality
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006-07
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1170-1180
- ISSN
- 0047-2425 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-2537
- OpenAlex
- W197662244
- Cited by
- 122
- References
- 34
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 10
- FWCI
- 4.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Environmental Quality (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Manitoba Manure Management Initiative, Inc.
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Salmonella and Campylobacter epidemiology
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Listeria monocytogenes in Food Safety
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Fecal contamination and water quality
- Keywords
- Salmonella survival, livestock manure, pig manure, soil temperature, soil moisture, loamy sand soil, clay soil, liquid manure, Salmonella serotypes, D-value, manure application timing, food safety, water pollution
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Bacteriological Techniques, Food Contamination, Food Microbiology, Manure, Salmonella, Seasons, Soil Microbiology, Temperature
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review