The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Sulfamethazine Uptake by Plants from Manure‐Amended Soil
Abstract
Animal manure is applied to agricultural land as a means to provide crop nutrients. However, animal manure often contains antibiotics as a result of extensive therapeutic and subtherapeutic use in livestock production. The objective of this study was to evaluate plant uptake of a sulfonamide‐class antibiotic, sulfamethazine, in corn (Zea mays L.), lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.), and potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) grown in a manure‐amended soil. The treatments were 0, 50, and 100 μg sulfamethazine mL−1 manure applied at a rate of 56 000 L ha−1 Results from the 45‐d greenhouse experiment showed that sulfamethazine was taken up by all three crops, with concentrations in plant tissue ranging from 0.1 to 1.2 mg kg−1 dry weight. Sulfamethazine concentrations in plant tissue increased with corresponding increase of sulfamethazine in manure. Highest plant tissue concentrations were found in corn and lettuce, followed by potato. Total accumulation of sulfamethazine in plant tissue after 45 d of growth was less than 0.1% of the amount applied to soil in manure. These results raise potential human health concerns of consuming low levels of antibiotics from produce grown on manure‐amended soils.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Patel, M., Kumar, R., Kishor, K., Mlsna, T., Pittman, C. U., & Mohan, D. (2019) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00299 · Cited by 2,654
Food Animals and Antimicrobials: Impacts on Human Health
Marshall, B. M., & Levy, S. B. (2011) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.00002-11 · Cited by 2,241
Antibiotic resistance gene spread due to manure application on agricultural fields
Heuer, H., Schmitt, H., & Smalla, K. (2011) · Current Opinion in Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.mib.2011.04.009 · Cited by 985
Fate of antibiotics in soil and their uptake by edible crops
Pan, M., & Chu, L. M. (2017) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.04.214 · Cited by 423
Uptake of human pharmaceuticals by plants grown under hydroponic conditions
Herklotz, P. A., Gurung, P., Vanden Heuvel, B., & Kinney, C. A. (2010) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2009.12.048 · Cited by 329
Metadata
- Authors
- Dolliver, H., Kumar, K., & Gupta, S.
- Venue
- Journal of Environmental Quality
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-07
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1224-1230
- ISSN
- 0047-2425 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-2537
- OpenAlex
- W2029508621
- Cited by
- 346
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 15.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sulfamethazine Uptake by Plants from Manure‐Amended Soil. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2134/jeq2006.0266
- The paper
- Dolliver, H., Kumar, K., & Gupta, S. (2007). Sulfamethazine Uptake by Plants from Manure‐Amended Soil. Journal of Environmental Quality. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2006.0266
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.