Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 379

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 97 of the 97 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Phosphorus Retention in Riparian Buffers: Review of Their Efficiency

Hoffmann, Carl Christian, Kjaergaard, Charlotte, Uusi‐Kämppä, Jaana, Hansen, Hans Christian Bruun, Kronvang, Brian·2009·Journal of Environmental Quality

Abstract

Ground water and surface water interactions are of fundamental importance for the biogeochemical processes governing phosphorus (P) dynamics in riparian buffers. The four most important conceptual hydrological pathways for P losses from and P retention in riparian buffers are reviewed in this paper: (i) The diffuse flow path with ground water flow through the riparian aquifer, (ii) the overland flow path across the riparian buffer with water coming from adjacent agricultural fields, (iii) irrigation of the riparian buffer with tile drainage water from agricultural fields where disconnected tile drains irrigate the riparian buffer, and (iv) inundation of the riparian buffer (floodplain) with river water during short or longer periods. We have examined how the different flow paths in the riparian buffer influence P retention mechanisms theoretically and from empirical evidence. The different hydrological flow paths determine where and how water‐borne P compounds meet and interact with iron and aluminum oxides or other minerals in the geochemical cycling of P in the complex and dynamic environment that constitutes a riparian buffer. The main physical process in the riparian buffer—sedimentation—is active along several flow paths and may account for P retention rates of up to 128 kg P ha−1 yr−1, while plant uptake may temporarily immobilize up to 15 kg P ha−1 yr−1 Retention of dissolved P in riparian buffers is not as pronounced as retention of particulate P and is often below 0.5 kg P ha−1 yr−1 Several studies show significant release of dissolved P (i.e., up to 8 kg P ha−1 yr−1).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2134/jeq2008.0087

Cites

97 of 97 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 97 references

Cited by

See all 379

Metadata

Authors
Hoffmann, C. C., Kjaergaard, C., Uusi‐Kämppä, J., Hansen, H. C. B., & Kronvang, B.
Venue
Journal of Environmental Quality
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-09
Volume
38
Issue
5
Pages
1942-1955
ISSN
  • 0047-2425 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-2537
OpenAlex
W1973872925
Cited by
379
References
97
FWCI
11.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Phosphorus Retention in Riparian Buffers: Review of Their Efficiency. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2134/jeq2008.0087
The paper
Hoffmann, C. C., Kjaergaard, C., Uusi‐Kämppä, J., Hansen, H. C. B., & Kronvang, B. (2009). Phosphorus Retention in Riparian Buffers: Review of Their Efficiency. Journal of Environmental Quality. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2008.0087

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.