Cited by 31Soil and Water Nutrient DynamicsWater Quality and Pollution AssessmentSoil erosion and sediment transport

Assessing the Yield and Load of Contaminants with Stream Order: Would Policy Requiring Livestock to Be Fenced Out of High‐Order Streams Decrease Catchment Contaminant Loads?

Open access
McDowell, R. W., Cox, N., Snelder, T. H.·2017·Journal of Environmental Quality

Abstract

Catchment contaminant loads vary with stream order as catchment characteristics influence inputs and in‐stream processing. However, the relative influence and policy significance of these characteristics across a number of contaminants and at a national scale is unclear. We modeled the significance of catchment characteristics (e.g., climate, topography, geology, land cover), as captured by a national‐scale River Environment Classification (REC) system, and stream order in the estimation of contaminant yields. We used this model to test if potential regulation in New Zealand requiring livestock to be fenced off from large (high)‐order streams would substantially decrease catchment contaminant loads. Concentration and flow data for 1998 to 2009 were used to calculate catchment load and yields of nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) species, suspended sediment, and Escherichia coli at 728 water quality monitoring sites. On average, the yields of all contaminants increased with increasing stream order in catchments dominated by agriculture (generally lowland and pastoral REC land cover classes). Loads from low‐order small streams (<1 m wide, 30 cm deep, and in flat catchments dominated by pasture) exempt from potential fencing regulations accounted for an average of 77% of the national load (varying from 73% for total N to 84% for dissolved reactive P). This means that to substantially reduce contaminant losses, other mitigations should be investigated in small streams, particularly where fencing of larger streams has low efficacy. Core Ideas: Contaminant yields increased with increasing stream order in catchments dominated by agriculture. Fencing off high‐order streams from stock misses 77% of national contaminant load from small‐order streams. Hence, to reduce contaminant losses to small streams, other mitigations are needed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2134/jeq2017.05.0212

Cites

62 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In contemporary legislation, ditches may be mostly ignored, e.g., in the USA Clean Water Act, and in New Zealand regulations where livestock do not have to be fenced out of agricultural ditches and streams <1 m wide and <30 cm deep.

    “Contrastingly, in contemporary legislation, ditches may be mostly ignored, e.g., in the USA Clean Water Act 88 , and in New Zealand regulations where livestock do not have to be fenced out of agricultural ditches and streams <1 m wide and <30 cm deep 89 .”

    From Lines in the landscape (2025) · cites this paper as [89]

  • Ditches often disproportionately contribute to catchment nutrient, sediment and pathogen loads.

    “Indeed, because ditches often disproportionately contribute to catchment nutrient, sediment and pathogen loads 89 they could be prime candidates for pollutant removal and mitigation.”

    From Lines in the landscape (2025) · cites this paper as [89]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McDowell, R. W., Cox, N., & Snelder, T. H.
Affiliations
  • Lincoln University (NZ)
  • AgResearch (NZ)
  • LWP Limited P.O. Box 70 Lyttelton New Zealand
Corresponding author
McDowell, R. W.
Venue
Journal of Environmental Quality
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-09
Volume
46
Issue
5
Pages
1038-1047
ISSN
  • 0047-2425 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-2537
OpenAlex
W2759786087
Cited by
31
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1
FWCI
2.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Environmental Quality (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion)
  • Lincoln University Research Archive (Lincoln University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • AgResearch
Funders
Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment (C10X1507)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Water Quality and Pollution Assessment
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil erosion and sediment transport
Keywords
stream order, livestock fencing, nitrogen, phosphorus, suspended sediment, Escherichia coli, agricultural catchments, small streams, water quality policy, New Zealand
MeSH terms
Agriculture, Animals, Animal Husbandry, Environmental Monitoring, Nitrogen, Phosphorus, Water Pollution, Rivers, Livestock

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review