The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Post–Green Revolution Trends in Yield Potential of Temperate Maize in the North‐Central United States
Abstract
This paper addresses the question of whether there has been an increase in yield potential of maize (Zea mays L.) hybrids released in the north‐central United States since the advent of the “Green Revolution” that began in the late 1960s. Because there are few published data about hybrid growth rates and yield‐determining plant traits when grown at yield potential levels, we attempt to address this issue indirectly by evaluation of maize breeding efforts, changes in plant traits of commercial hybrids, and by comparison of statewide average yield trends and yield trends in sanctioned yield contests. On the basis of these sources of information and a definition of yield potential as the yield that can be achieved with an adapted hybrid when grown without obvious stress of any kind, we found that there is conflicting evidence to support the hypothesis that maize yield potential has increased. We recommend experimental approaches to quantify and investigate the determinants of maize yield potential in the north‐central United States and for use in breeding hybrids with greater yield potential.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Yield Improvement in Temperate Maize is Attributable to Greater Stress Tolerance
Tollenaar, M., & Wu, J. (1999) · Crop Science · doi:10.2135/cropsci1999.3961597x · Cited by 609
Genetic Improvement of Maize Yields
Russell, W. A. (1991) · Advances in Agronomy · doi:10.1016/s0065-2113(08)60582-9 · Cited by 276
Cited by
Agricultural sustainability and intensive production practices
Tilman, D., Cassman, K. G., Matson, P. A., Naylor, R., & Polasky, S. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature01014 · Cited by 7,957
Self-citationThe Contribution of Breeding to Yield Advances in maize (Zea mays L.)
Duvick, D. N. (2005) · Advances in Agronomy · doi:10.1016/s0065-2113(05)86002-x · Cited by 1,214
Self-citationNet energy of cellulosic ethanol from switchgrass
Schmer, M. R., Vogel, K. P., Mitchell, R. B., & Perrin, R. K. (2008) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0704767105 · Cited by 1,067
Distinguishing between yield advances and yield plateaus in historical crop production trends
Grassini, P., Eskridge, K. M., & Cassman, K. G. (2013) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms3918 · Cited by 835
Self-citationRedefining agricultural yields: from tonnes to people nourished per hectare
Cassidy, E. S., West, P. C., Gerber, J. S., & Foley, J. A. (2013) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/8/3/034015 · Cited by 673
Metadata
- Authors
- Duvick, D. N., & Cassman, K. G.
- Venue
- Crop Science
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1999-11
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1622-1630
- ISSN
- 0011-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1435-0653
- OpenAlex
- W1965713452
- Cited by
- 706
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 22.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Post–Green Revolution Trends in Yield Potential of Temperate Maize in the North‐Central United States. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2135/cropsci1999.3961622x
- The paper
- Duvick, D. N., & Cassman, K. G. (1999). Post–Green Revolution Trends in Yield Potential of Temperate Maize in the North‐Central United States. Crop Science. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1999.3961622x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.