Cited by 673Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental ImpactAgricultural and Food Production StudiesLand Use and Ecosystem Services

Redefining agricultural yields: from tonnes to people nourished per hectare

Open access
Cassidy, Emily S, West, Paul C, Gerber, James S, Foley, Jonathan A·2013·Environmental Research Letters

Abstract

Worldwide demand for crops is increasing rapidly due to global population growth, increased biofuel production, and changing dietary preferences. Meeting these growing demands will be a substantial challenge that will tax the capability of our food system and prompt calls to dramatically boost global crop production. However, to increase food availability, we may also consider how the world's crops are allocated to different uses and whether it is possible to feed more people with current levels of crop production. Of particular interest are the uses of crops as animal feed and as biofuel feedstocks. Currently, 36% of the calories produced by the world's crops are being used for animal feed, and only 12% of those feed calories ultimately contribute to the human diet (as meat and other animal products). Additionally, human-edible calories used for biofuel production increased fourfold between the years 2000 and 2010, from 1% to 4%, representing a net reduction of available food globally. In this study, we re-examine agricultural productivity, going from using the standard definition of yield (in tonnes per hectare, or similar units) to using the number of people actually fed per hectare of cropland. We find that, given the current mix of crop uses, growing food exclusively for direct human consumption could, in principle, increase available food calories by as much as 70%, which could feed an additional 4 billion people (more than the projected 2–3 billion people arriving through population growth). Even small shifts in our allocation of crops to animal feed and biofuels could significantly increase global food availability, and could be an instrumental tool in meeting the challenges of ensuring global food security.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/1748-9326/8/3/034015

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Yield is not a good standalone metric of farming performance; what is produced provides a better view of a farm's sustainability in relation to the wider food system, especially for organic production.

    “yield is not a good standalone metric of farming performance -what is produced provides a better view of a farm ' s sustainability in relation to the wider food system (Cassidy et al. 2013), especially concerning organic production (Muller et al. 2018).”

    From Delivering “less but better” meat in practice—a case study of a farm in agroecological transition (2022) · cites this paper as Cassidy et al. 2013

    The Introduction compares tonnes produced per hectare with food actually delivered per hectare, supporting the point that yield alone misses how production serves the wider food system. Cassidy et al. do not assess the sustainability of individual farms; that part extends beyond their analysis. The organic-production qualification is attached to Muller et al. (2018), not Cassidy et al. (LLM, conf=0.80)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Smil V 2000 Feeding the World: A Challenge for the 21st Century (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press) pp 145-57

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cassidy, E. S., West, P. C., Gerber, J. S., & Foley, J. A.
Affiliations
University of Minnesota (US)
Venue
Environmental Research Letters
Published
2013-08-01
Volume
8
Issue
3
Pages
034015
ISSN
1748-9326 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2123649182
Cited by
673
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 31 · 2025: 46 · 2024: 56 · 2023: 63 · 2022: 56 · 2021: 88 · 2020: 67 · 2019: 51 · 2018: 53 · 2017: 43 · 2016: 38 · 2015: 54 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
34.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Environmental Research Letters (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration
  • Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation
  • PepsiCo
  • General Mills
  • University of Minnesota
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Agricultural and Food Production Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Land Use and Ecosystem Services
Keywords
agricultural yields, food availability, food security, crop allocation, animal feed, biofuel feedstock, agricultural land productivity, population growth, food demand

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review