Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 417

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Selection for Reduced Carbon Isotope Discrimination Increases Aerial Biomass and Grain Yield of Rainfed Bread Wheat

Rebetzke, G. J., Condon, A. G., Richards, R. A., Farquhar, G. D.·2002·Crop Science

Abstract

Genetic gain is characteristically slow when selecting directly for increased grain yield under water‐limited conditions. Genetic increases in grain yield may be achieved through increases in aerial biomass following selection for greater transpiration efficiency (TE as aerial biomass/water transpired). Strong negative correlations between TE and carbon isotope discrimination (Δ) in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) suggest that selection of progeny with low Δ may increase TE and aerial biomass under water‐limited conditions. This study investigated how early generation, divergent selection for Δ affected aerial biomass and grain yield among 30 low‐ and 30 high‐Δ, ‘Hartog’‐like, BC 2 F 4:6 progeny and the recurrent, high‐Δ parent Hartog. Lines were evaluated in nine environments varying for seasonal rainfall (235–437 mm) and hence grain yield (1.3–6.2 Mg/ha). Selection for low Δ in early generation progeny was associated with significantly (P < 0.01) smaller Δ, higher grain yield (+5.8%), aerial biomass (+2.7%), harvest index (+3.3%), and kernel size (+4.8%) in tested lines. Kernel number was the same for low‐ and high‐Δ selected groups. Grain yield advantage of the low Δ group increased with reductions in environment mean yield (r = −0.89, P < 0.01) and total seasonal rainfall (r = −0.85, P < 0.01) indicating the benefit of low Δ, and therefore high TE for genetic improvement of grain yield in lower rainfall environments. Narrow‐sense heritability on a single‐plot basis was much greater for Δ (h2 = 0.63 ± 0.10) than for either aerial biomass (0.06 ± 0.05) or grain yield (0.14 ± 0.04). Strong genetic correlations between Δ and both aerial biomass (r g = −0.61 ± 0.14) and grain yield (−0.58 ± 0.12) suggest Δ could be used for indirect selection of these traits in early generations. Selection of low Δ (high TE) families for the advanced stages of multiple‐environment testing should increase the probability of recovering higher‐yielding wheat families for water‐limited environments.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2135/cropsci2002.7390

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 417

Metadata

Authors
Rebetzke, G. J., Condon, A. G., Richards, R. A., & Farquhar, G. D.
Venue
Crop Science
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2002-05
Volume
42
Issue
3
Pages
739-745
ISSN
  • 0011-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1435-0653
OpenAlex
W1991589446
Cited by
417
References
4
FWCI
13.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Selection for Reduced Carbon Isotope Discrimination Increases Aerial Biomass and Grain Yield of Rainfed Bread Wheat. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2135/cropsci2002.7390
The paper
Rebetzke, G. J., Condon, A. G., Richards, R. A., & Farquhar, G. D. (2002). Selection for Reduced Carbon Isotope Discrimination Increases Aerial Biomass and Grain Yield of Rainfed Bread Wheat. Crop Science. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2002.7390

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.