The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Classification of Maize Environments Using Crop Simulation and Geographic Information Systems
Open accessAbstract
The effectiveness of a cultivar evaluation system largely depends on the genetic correlation between genotype performance in multienvironment trials (MET) and in the target population of environments (TPE). Previous classifications of maize (Zea mays L.) environments on the basis of climate and soil did not quantify their impact on the genetic correlations among environments. Consequently, plant breeders have favored classifications based on the similarity of cultivar discrimination in trials. However, these efforts frequently fail to provide adequate assessments of the TPE, since they require long‐term performance data, which are not normally collected due to high cost. To describe the TPE, we performed crop simulations for each U.S. Corn Belt Township for the period 1952 through 2002, using standard CERES‐Maize model inputs. To classify METs, input data were collected at or near the trial sites. Grain yield and biotic stress data for model confirmation were collected from 18 hybrids grown in replicated trials in 266 environments in 2000–2002. On the basis of prevailing conditions during key growth stages, and observed patterns of genotype × environment interactions (GEI), six major environment classes (EC) were identified. The relative frequency of each EC varied greatly from year to year and significant hybrid × EC interaction variance was observed. Our environmental classification system provided a useful description of some of the features of both the TPE and MET. Knowledge of the spatial (locations) and temporal (years) distributions of ECs that influence the incidence of GEI can be used to improve cultivar performance predictability in the U.S. Corn Belt TPE.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cooper, M., & DeLacy, I. H. (1994) · Theoretical and Applied Genetics · doi:10.1007/bf01240919 · Cited by 349
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 21
- 10.1016/0168-1923(84)90017-0 · DOI · Paper page
- Burdon R.D., 1977, Genetic correlation as a concept for studying genotype-environment interaction in forest tree breeding, Silvae Genet., 26, 168
- 10.1071/AR99021 · DOI · Paper page
- Comstock R.E., 1977, Proc. Int. Conf. on Quant. Genet., Ames, Iowa. 16–21 Aug. 1976, 705
- 10.1016/0378-4290(93)90137-C · DOI
- Cooper M., 1999, The genetics and exploitation of heterosis in crops, 81
- DeLacy I.H., 1996, Plant adaptation and crop improvement, 39
- Wit C.T., 1965, Photosynthesis of leaf canopies
- Donahue R.L., 1990, Our soils and their management, 231
- Hoblit B.C., 2000, Next generation rainfall data
- MapInfo Corporation, 2003, MapInfo professional. Comprehensive insight for location-powered decision support and data analysis
- 10.1046/j.1439-0523.1999.118001017.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2134/agronj1993.00021962008500060007x · DOI
- 10.13031/2013.33720 · DOI · Paper page
- Ritchie J.T., 1986, CERES Maize: A simulation model of maize growth and development, 1
- 10.2134/agronj1968.00021962006000050018x · DOI
- Steeves P., 1994, 1:250,000-scale Hydrologic Units of the United States. ed. 1. Issue 94:0236
- U.S. Department of Agriculture, 1994, State soil geographic (STATSGO) data base-data use information. Miscellaneous Publication 1492
- Venables W.N., 1999, Modern applied statistics with S-Plus, 123, 10.1007/978-1-4757-3121-7 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S0378-4290(02)00041-2 · DOI
- Wei J., 2002, In Annual meetings abstracts [CD-ROM]
Cited by
Shi, J., Gao, H., Wang, H., Lafitte, H. R., Archibald, R. L., Yang, M., Hakimi, S. M., Mo, H., & Habben, J. E. (2017) · Plant Biotechnology Journal · doi:10.1111/pbi.12603 · Cited by 1,029
Hammer, G. L., Dong, Z., McLean, G., Doherty, A., Messina, C., Schussler, J., Zinselmeier, C., Paszkiewicz, S., & Cooper, M. (2009) · Crop Science · doi:10.2135/cropsci2008.03.0152 · Cited by 745
Self-citationPredicting the future of plant breeding: complementing empirical evaluation with genetic prediction
Cooper, M., Messina, C. D., Podlich, D., Totir, L. R., Baumgarten, A., Hausmann, N. J., Wright, D., & Graham, G. (2014) · Crop & Pasture Science · doi:10.1071/cp14007 · Cited by 411
Self-citationAccelerating crop genetic gains with genomic selection
Voss-Fels, K. P., Cooper, M., & Hayes, B. J. (2019) · Theoretical and Applied Genetics · doi:10.1007/s00122-018-3270-8 · Cited by 381
Self-citationHeslot, N., Akdemir, D., Sorrells, M. E., & Jannink, J.-L. (2014) · Theoretical and Applied Genetics · doi:10.1007/s00122-013-2231-5 · Cited by 409
Metadata
- Authors
- Löffler, C. M., Wei, J., Fast, T., Gogerty, J., Langton, S., Bergman, M., Merrill, B., & Cooper, M.
- Venue
- Crop Science
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-09
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1708-1716
- ISSN
- 0011-183X (ISSN-L)
- 1435-0653
- OpenAlex
- W2023645530
- Cited by
- 165
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Classification of Maize Environments Using Crop Simulation and Geographic Information Systems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2135/cropsci2004.0370
- The paper
- Löffler, C. M., Wei, J., Fast, T., Gogerty, J., Langton, S., Bergman, M., Merrill, B., & Cooper, M. (2005). Classification of Maize Environments Using Crop Simulation and Geographic Information Systems. Crop Science. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2004.0370
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.